{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72","short_pith_number":"pith:YQQA2XE6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c4200d5c9ef0894bc6312dccde0764fe850e58a07d4cd69dcfe073ed43e61f77","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1810.12844","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics, 97(3), 555-570","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Fulvio Viel, Giovanni Abramo","submitted_at":"2018-10-30T16:38:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is becoming ever more common to use bibliometric indicators to evaluate the performance of research institutions, however there is often a failure to recognize the limits and drawbacks of such indicators. Since performance measurement is aimed at supporting critical decisions by research administrators and policy makers, it is essential to carry out empirical testing of the robustness of the indicators used. In this work we examine the accuracy of the popular \"h\" and \"g\" indexes for measuring university research performance by comparing the ranking lists derived from their application to th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1810.12844","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2018-10-30T16:38:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"15130fe693f054b26bc083f278c908f44f1906a3041d5e34e93bad24c381e07c","abstract_canon_sha256":"527cbb1900d7ca88fb757e8292823fca052425f0b6f74eae0f75da862d8e784e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995914Z","signature_b64":"mwj/MGJZKNjDn1pmS9JFrzt45l+mb4pvDFoqiOVZrbPEGBAqxoGGPsNvgAcvYjlPCbX0CGPMZvU1nb24Ang+Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c4200d5c9ef0894bc6312dccde0764fe850e58a07d4cd69dcfe073ed43e61f77","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995514Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995514Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics, 97(3), 555-570","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Fulvio Viel, Giovanni Abramo","submitted_at":"2018-10-30T16:38:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is becoming ever more common to use bibliometric indicators to evaluate the performance of research institutions, however there is often a failure to recognize the limits and drawbacks of such indicators. Since performance measurement is aimed at supporting critical decisions by research administrators and policy makers, it is essential to carry out empirical testing of the robustness of the indicators used. In this work we examine the accuracy of the popular \"h\" and \"g\" indexes for measuring university research performance by comparing the ranking lists derived from their application to th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1810.12844","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1810.12844","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1810.12844v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1810.12844","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YQQA2XE66CEU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:04.347982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YQQA2XE66CEUXRRR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:04.347982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YQQA2XE6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:04.347982+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YQQA2XE6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YQQA2XE6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1810.12844&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YQQA2XE66CEUXRRRFXGN4B3E72/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995573+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:53.995573+00:00"}