{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2000:YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7","short_pith_number":"pith:YQYI27H5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c4308d7cfd11af6f750f996650322e8fe1bc34f5398f27f615257b8e2609839a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-ph/0009204","version":7},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th","physics.soc-ph","quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Adrian Kent (DAMTP, University of Cambridge)","submitted_at":"2000-09-18T16:07:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent papers by Busza et al. (BJSW) and Dar et al. (DDH) argue that astrophysical data can be used to establish small bounds on the risk of a \"killer strangelet\" catastrophe scenario in the RHIC and ALICE collider experiments. DDH and other commentators (initially including BJSW) suggested that these empirical bounds alone do give sufficient reassurance. This seems unsupportable when the bounds are expressed in terms of expected cost -- a good measure, according to standard risk analysis arguments. For example, DDH's main bound, $p_{\\rm catastrophe} < 2 \\times 10^{-8}$, implies only that the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-ph/0009204","kind":"arxiv","version":7},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2000-09-18T16:07:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th","physics.soc-ph","quant-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"05ef946fc6fb6fc456f9bef396d4bad882c9bf03a89bb0cc50f4f29e4de54622","abstract_canon_sha256":"a39f4fe764b9780ff0c845cce1f5e35e605dfaeab81c39afd5283ac4a63c4269"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490761Z","signature_b64":"KEtjiYR3T2DH3Z9NU9UMsoFCa1RK9Tc7S79ipMzALBmgSlqbBvzRGPThJ/J7HiOXbhc9PXXag/7Wy8cNgswADg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c4308d7cfd11af6f750f996650322e8fe1bc34f5398f27f615257b8e2609839a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490245Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490245Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th","physics.soc-ph","quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Adrian Kent (DAMTP, University of Cambridge)","submitted_at":"2000-09-18T16:07:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent papers by Busza et al. (BJSW) and Dar et al. (DDH) argue that astrophysical data can be used to establish small bounds on the risk of a \"killer strangelet\" catastrophe scenario in the RHIC and ALICE collider experiments. DDH and other commentators (initially including BJSW) suggested that these empirical bounds alone do give sufficient reassurance. This seems unsupportable when the bounds are expressed in terms of expected cost -- a good measure, according to standard risk analysis arguments. For example, DDH's main bound, $p_{\\rm catastrophe} < 2 \\times 10^{-8}$, implies only that the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-ph/0009204","kind":"arxiv","version":7},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-ph/0009204","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-ph/0009204v7","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/0009204","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YQYI27H5CGXW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:50.254431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YQYI27H5CGXW65IP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:50.254431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YQYI27H5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:50.254431+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YQYI27H5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YQYI27H5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-ph/0009204&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YQYI27H5CGXW65IPTFTFAMROR7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490328+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:36:21.490328+00:00"}