{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L","short_pith_number":"pith:YR5YLPBU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c47b85bc34f83bf58a229d1f7074cde2fe04db63617e3dd87b444020d76ff89b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.03220","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory -- Exploring Strategic Decision-Making with AI Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengyi Wang, Furu Wei, Shaoguang Mao, Tao Ge, Wenshan Wu, Xun Wang, Yan Xia, Yuzhe Cai","submitted_at":"2023-11-06T16:03:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces Alympics (Olympics for Agents), a systematic simulation framework utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents for game theory research. Alympics creates a versatile platform for studying complex game theory problems, bridging the gap between theoretical game theory and empirical investigations by providing a controlled environment for simulating human-like strategic interactions with LLM agents. In our pilot case study, the \"Water Allocation Challenge,\" we explore Alympics through a challenging strategic game focused on the multi-round auction on scarce survival resources"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.03220","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-06T16:03:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"686724950482047ad540fdc4b8d9cd1565cfa24b009a9092b3d83feaf79ca052","abstract_canon_sha256":"8c4198152411508449fb83829987504575b6f1444c9baf8f452ab3910d0d6942"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861856Z","signature_b64":"FcJg8KPqEQCa/RrQ66ZeDpfsv/hMETDny3G8GwMDE1iAkWpwTZHFtgDQF/5jBuz+5ObEppN5K3HS48Kha9UuCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c47b85bc34f83bf58a229d1f7074cde2fe04db63617e3dd87b444020d76ff89b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861387Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861387Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory -- Exploring Strategic Decision-Making with AI Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengyi Wang, Furu Wei, Shaoguang Mao, Tao Ge, Wenshan Wu, Xun Wang, Yan Xia, Yuzhe Cai","submitted_at":"2023-11-06T16:03:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces Alympics (Olympics for Agents), a systematic simulation framework utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents for game theory research. Alympics creates a versatile platform for studying complex game theory problems, bridging the gap between theoretical game theory and empirical investigations by providing a controlled environment for simulating human-like strategic interactions with LLM agents. In our pilot case study, the \"Water Allocation Challenge,\" we explore Alympics through a challenging strategic game focused on the multi-round auction on scarce survival resources"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.03220","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.03220/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.03220","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.03220v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.03220","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YR5YLPBU7A57","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YR5YLPBU7A57LCRC","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YR5YLPBU","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09682","citing_title":"Decision-Theoretic Safety Assessment of Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Systems in O-RAN","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.01680","citing_title":"Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07301","citing_title":"SOM: Structured Opponent Modeling for LLM-based Agents via Structural Causal Model","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05523","citing_title":"Market-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Economic and Trade Competition","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YR5YLPBU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YR5YLPBU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.03220&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YR5YLPBU7A57LCRCTUPXA5GN4L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:57.861447+00:00"}