{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I","short_pith_number":"pith:YSD7NU7I","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c487f6d3e8966df660ff62d2220435fa25135b9871a8b6babacada5bcacd02fe","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.13459","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Six Million (Suspected) Fake Stars in GitHub: A Growing Spiral of Popularity Contests, Spams, and Malware","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Alexandros Kapravelos, Bogdan Vasilescu, Christian K\\\"astner, Hao He, Haoqin Yang, Philipp Burckhardt","submitted_at":"2024-12-18T03:03:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"GitHub, the de facto platform for open-source software development, provides a set of social-media-like features to signal high-quality repositories. Among them, the star count is the most widely used popularity signal, but it is also at risk of being artificially inflated (i.e., faked), decreasing its value as a decision-making signal and posing a security risk to all GitHub users. In this paper, we present a systematic, global, and longitudinal measurement study of fake stars in GitHub. To this end, we build StarScout, a scalable tool able to detect anomalous starring behaviors across all Gi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.13459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-12-18T03:03:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SE"],"title_canon_sha256":"10c44136fc190878e3aafc104996b57abc24c54c6c55c4f8a9b9c4556b3aae49","abstract_canon_sha256":"5f0790238b5726b2b271f8cf9393740852b5ad46f8d47d167d1dae23fbabca92"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.122250Z","signature_b64":"rz3gjAyCCtPLW4mDAq/NUj8yZqFcpoy3aqcTYb8YQgfJz+T/shwRVxO4LuGCPLqnOTSRJcWnkFe3AIjQs8BuDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c487f6d3e8966df660ff62d2220435fa25135b9871a8b6babacada5bcacd02fe","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121755Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121755Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Six Million (Suspected) Fake Stars in GitHub: A Growing Spiral of Popularity Contests, Spams, and Malware","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Alexandros Kapravelos, Bogdan Vasilescu, Christian K\\\"astner, Hao He, Haoqin Yang, Philipp Burckhardt","submitted_at":"2024-12-18T03:03:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"GitHub, the de facto platform for open-source software development, provides a set of social-media-like features to signal high-quality repositories. Among them, the star count is the most widely used popularity signal, but it is also at risk of being artificially inflated (i.e., faked), decreasing its value as a decision-making signal and posing a security risk to all GitHub users. In this paper, we present a systematic, global, and longitudinal measurement study of fake stars in GitHub. To this end, we build StarScout, a scalable tool able to detect anomalous starring behaviors across all Gi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.13459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.13459/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.13459","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.13459v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.13459","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YSD7NU7ISZW7","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YSD7NU7I","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26291","citing_title":"Beyond Takedown: Measuring Malicious Go Module Persistence in the Wild","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.02453","citing_title":"Adoption and Ecosystem Health: A Longitudinal Analysis of Open-Source Multi-Agent Frameworks","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.17510","citing_title":"Psychological Safety Framework in Pull-based Open Source Projects","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.02372","citing_title":"Scam2Prompt: A Scalable Framework for Auditing Malicious Scam Endpoints in Production LLMs","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YSD7NU7I"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YSD7NU7I","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.13459&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YSD7NU7ISZW7MYH7MLJCEBBV7I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:04.121813+00:00"}