{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S","short_pith_number":"pith:YUBCUJJ2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c5022a253a186bfe93f00abe1af32bfc8224ffba1e09bfefb200ca040d849a8c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.11429","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Explanation Game -- Rekindled (Extended Version)","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Joao Marques-Silva, Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang","submitted_at":"2025-01-20T12:00:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent work demonstrated the existence of critical flaws in the current use of Shapley values in explainable AI (XAI), i.e. the so-called SHAP scores. These flaws are significant in that the scores provided to a human decision-maker can be misleading. Although these negative results might appear to indicate that Shapley values ought not be used in XAI, this paper argues otherwise. Concretely, this paper proposes a novel definition of SHAP scores that overcomes existing flaws. Furthermore, the paper outlines a practically efficient solution for the rigorous estimation of the novel SHAP scores. "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.11429","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-01-20T12:00:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"69ab1ad95006051196a47f9498fa4c79df94f8764851ab9b0a76621868ce021b","abstract_canon_sha256":"0f0d583742c8b725bedb45184d1ea4655fa8a3545e01f7ee4985f16465ef096d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.950278Z","signature_b64":"RGY9B0orOm85fIQQ+dE1EdNnV5L4oYC4a1v1jZZBg248fWIY0MRGi+rgidSXMNW6b44HYH55dE62SnQXuytiAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c5022a253a186bfe93f00abe1af32bfc8224ffba1e09bfefb200ca040d849a8c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949722Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949722Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Explanation Game -- Rekindled (Extended Version)","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Joao Marques-Silva, Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang","submitted_at":"2025-01-20T12:00:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent work demonstrated the existence of critical flaws in the current use of Shapley values in explainable AI (XAI), i.e. the so-called SHAP scores. These flaws are significant in that the scores provided to a human decision-maker can be misleading. Although these negative results might appear to indicate that Shapley values ought not be used in XAI, this paper argues otherwise. Concretely, this paper proposes a novel definition of SHAP scores that overcomes existing flaws. Furthermore, the paper outlines a practically efficient solution for the rigorous estimation of the novel SHAP scores. "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.11429","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.11429/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.11429","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.11429v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.11429","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YUBCUJJ2DBV7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YUBCUJJ2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15898","citing_title":"Towards Rigorous Explainability by Feature Attribution","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YUBCUJJ2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YUBCUJJ2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.11429&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YUBCUJJ2DBV75E7QBK7BV4ZL7S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:49.949793+00:00"}