{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52","short_pith_number":"pith:YV4LGZIC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c578b36502f06bec4006102b7063b9ee98c6fe33fceec6b19c512ca685010f27","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2004.14497","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Edward H. Kennedy","submitted_at":"2020-04-29T22:02:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Heterogeneous effect estimation plays a crucial role in causal inference, with applications across medicine and social science. Many methods for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) have been proposed in recent years, but there are important theoretical gaps in understanding if and when such methods are optimal. This is especially true when the CATE has nontrivial structure (e.g., smoothness or sparsity). Our work contributes in several main ways. First, we study a two-stage doubly robust CATE estimator and give a generic model-free error bound, which, despite its generalit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2004.14497","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2020-04-29T22:02:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"91708efb200e8387afffb0f5dd589b51036ce753b89b3fc8a422dd2620005b4e","abstract_canon_sha256":"c7e7e14d78e0ab52206a44c678987824754469c9918b2636d0b8a994b5b0a1af"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.131206Z","signature_b64":"9uMb/1V6prf/0NNZtz2sChHL27BuOzaGeIHBVIRIeJjtuEDZNgBLF4eOhRg+yW9BrgVV1txyUGbxW9qUcPmnAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c578b36502f06bec4006102b7063b9ee98c6fe33fceec6b19c512ca685010f27","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130822Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130822Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Edward H. Kennedy","submitted_at":"2020-04-29T22:02:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Heterogeneous effect estimation plays a crucial role in causal inference, with applications across medicine and social science. Many methods for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) have been proposed in recent years, but there are important theoretical gaps in understanding if and when such methods are optimal. This is especially true when the CATE has nontrivial structure (e.g., smoothness or sparsity). Our work contributes in several main ways. First, we study a two-stage doubly robust CATE estimator and give a generic model-free error bound, which, despite its generalit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2004.14497","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2004.14497/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2004.14497","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2004.14497v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2004.14497","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YV4LGZIC6BV6","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAG","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YV4LGZIC","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":10,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23656","citing_title":"Causal Inference with Multiple Misclassified Exposures: A Control Variate-Adjusted Calibration Weighting Approach","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14952","citing_title":"Generalizing conditional average treatment effects from nested randomized trials to all trial-eligible individuals","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26288","citing_title":"Beyond Differences: Doubly Robust Meta-Learners for Ratio-Based Treatment Effects","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2207.11825","citing_title":"Fast convergence rates for dose-response estimation","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21928","citing_title":"CausalGuard: Conformal Inference under Graph Uncertainty","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17126","citing_title":"Multi-task Linear Regression without Eigenvalue Lower Bounds: Adaptivity, Robustness, and Safety","ref_index":125,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.13397","citing_title":"Assessing the robustness of heterogeneous treatment effects in survival analysis under informative censoring","ref_index":56,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.04611","citing_title":"Targeted Synthetic Control Method","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27394","citing_title":"Bayesian X-Learner: Calibrated Posterior Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Heavy-Tailed Outcomes","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10398","citing_title":"Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with survival outcomes via a deep survival learner","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YV4LGZIC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YV4LGZIC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2004.14497&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YV4LGZIC6BV6YQAGCAVXAY5Z52/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:42:54.130889+00:00"}