{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF","short_pith_number":"pith:YVBFNHUH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c542569e876153416a71556f08e0d50970c66e79933712d2c286178094a0f3c8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.03383","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"From Bjorken Scaling to Scaling Violations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Giorgio Parisi","submitted_at":"2025-06-03T20:42:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper traces the historical and conceptual journey from Bjorken scaling to the discovery of scaling violations in deep inelastic scattering, culminating in the development of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Beginning with the challenges faced by early strong interaction theories in the 1950s, we explore the emergence of agnostic approaches such as the bootstrap philosophy and current algebra, which sought to describe hadronic phenomena without relying on specific field theories. The pivotal role of experimental results from SLAC in the late 1960s is highlighted, leading to Bjorken's proposa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.03383","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2025-06-03T20:42:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"d046ece71a002a764d3b902e7e4d163bf2f32eafdbb81923360a8805005be3d1","abstract_canon_sha256":"651c700fad5b488dd82cfd025b36830308b23e3dd8a01f9b2f4e4952b1c97346"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611745Z","signature_b64":"6kSNHGTMIR7fxOHNAUr9kRdbM+O7uwbpcZ4rRKaKZK54YNCe18uhu1p8CnaZPe3FfQ0DuT+WeOid2V6dncpYDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c542569e876153416a71556f08e0d50970c66e79933712d2c286178094a0f3c8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611288Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611288Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"From Bjorken Scaling to Scaling Violations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Giorgio Parisi","submitted_at":"2025-06-03T20:42:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper traces the historical and conceptual journey from Bjorken scaling to the discovery of scaling violations in deep inelastic scattering, culminating in the development of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Beginning with the challenges faced by early strong interaction theories in the 1950s, we explore the emergence of agnostic approaches such as the bootstrap philosophy and current algebra, which sought to describe hadronic phenomena without relying on specific field theories. The pivotal role of experimental results from SLAC in the late 1960s is highlighted, leading to Bjorken's proposa"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.03383","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.03383/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.03383","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.03383v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.03383","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YVBFNHUHMFJU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YVBFNHUH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18176","citing_title":"Perturbative QCD as a quantitative tool in the years 1976-2000","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YVBFNHUH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YVBFNHUH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.03383&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YVBFNHUHMFJUC2TRKVXQRYGVBF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:26.611353+00:00"}