{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ","short_pith_number":"pith:YVDWE34U","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5972e8ac4d3b93e44b9bc4601eb12cf99e15b6ab773f51968a6f1c48f491a9c4","abstract_canon_sha256":"8934a7c69321f3ed3b134abcfd6e7f53f1156f1e13dde036cf45b534af80efb4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"c547626f943191b3f7e1dfa2d600719a611ffcc0f587672b07830f8dd3dfc064","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.13053","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13053","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13053v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13053","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YVDWE34UGGI3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YVDWE34UGGI3H57B","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YVDWE34U","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5972e8ac4d3b93e44b9bc4601eb12cf99e15b6ab773f51968a6f1c48f491a9c4","abstract_canon_sha256":"8934a7c69321f3ed3b134abcfd6e7f53f1156f1e13dde036cf45b534af80efb4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"c547626f943191b3f7e1dfa2d600719a611ffcc0f587672b07830f8dd3dfc064","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.257524Z","signature_b64":"+GqKKga6oWVAD19H81dOoEl6zJza8yXyXW0ae4YKGg87z44szknwiSCkWw7ZBH8U+HtRit4sG6ws3ytp0v/tDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c547626f943191b3f7e1dfa2d600719a611ffcc0f587672b07830f8dd3dfc064","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.256717Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.256717Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.13053","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"0pxobty+Ggc1Mzx+hTXxNcqMktXaOgdxvV+XzBlTSX0xE9AfVkYtc4oMQGzvFT6wTJ1VmcwKjuF1xnGx+lbnDg==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-25T20:26:13.000366Z"},"content_sha256":"a2e17d560065fb1a3a799a39c46379325692d136e47598f9cffed407b8693389","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:a2e17d560065fb1a3a799a39c46379325692d136e47598f9cffed407b8693389"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Standardized Re-evaluation of Conversational Recommender Systems on the ReDial Dataset","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Ivica Kostric, Krisztian Balog","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent years have seen a surge of research into conversational recommender systems (CRS). Among existing datasets, ReDial is the most widely used benchmark, cited in hundreds of studies. However, variations in how the dataset is preprocessed and used in experiments, particularly in the definition of ground-truth items, make it difficult to compare results across studies. These comparisons are further complicated by confounding factors such as the choice of the underlying large language model (LLM) and the use of external data sources. In this work, we revisit seven prominent CRS methods across"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Our reproducibility study reveals a granularity gap, where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details, while our replicability analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation. Furthermore, we find that performance gains are often driven more by the capacity of the LLM backbone than by specific architectural innovations.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The chosen seven methods and three architectural families are representative of the broader CRS literature, and the single standardized preprocessing pipeline adopted here is the correct reference point against which all prior results should be judged.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Standardized re-evaluation of CRS methods on ReDial finds that nearly half of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts absent in novelty-focused tests, performance tracks LLM capacity more than architecture, and traditional recall overstates conversational utility.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"28ac9178718383bcad7e776140dc1b9de283399a7bb04e0f8cd14fce6ed89f8d"},"source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"941323af-af85-4720-bff5-9559a55d5512","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:33:10.205502Z","strongest_claim":"Our reproducibility study reveals a granularity gap, where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details, while our replicability analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation. Furthermore, we find that performance gains are often driven more by the capacity of the LLM backbone than by specific architectural innovations.","one_line_summary":"Standardized re-evaluation of CRS methods on ReDial finds that nearly half of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts absent in novelty-focused tests, performance tracks LLM capacity more than architecture, and traditional recall overstates conversational utility.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The chosen seven methods and three architectural families are representative of the broader CRS literature, and the single standardized preprocessing pipeline adopted here is the correct reference point against which all prior results should be judged.","pith_extraction_headline":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty."},"references":{"count":22,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Nolwenn Bernard and Krisztian Balog. 2025. Limitations of Current Evaluation Practices for Conversational Recommender Systems and the Potential of User Simulation. InProceedings of the 2025 Annual Int","work_id":"ddeb2d4c-9294-487c-883e-182ff42a2669","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2019,"title":"Qibin Chen, Junyang Lin, Yichang Zhang, Ming Ding, Yukuo Cen, Hongxia Yang, and Jie Tang. 2019. Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog System. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Me","work_id":"a86eb56f-b267-4ad8-be88-7bb28041229f","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs","work_id":"d3fdf68e-3a5e-48b5-8a18-7a9137479c55","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"2305.14314","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Simone Boglio, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach","work_id":"3ac291bb-48db-4fcd-905b-31730fa5b967","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2021,"title":"A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Research.ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.39, 2 (2021), 20:1–20:49","work_id":"721c4ad5-1fa1-4ee9-ac9e-04b0d033447c","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":22,"snapshot_sha256":"29fccc88b8bfe1383ee65c29a4acff395a05059c86d16822cc7e8d90554d8a46","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"941323af-af85-4720-bff5-9559a55d5512"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"sfI7TJ4s0zsaxjLS+dWmwCqnX0h3GQG2sANtROG8hZgcAd4Avf0PFPbPdSZgiwdA5xyMFdFBT2aPHa/ycj+rBQ==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-25T20:26:13.001308Z"},"content_sha256":"10a5bae26d3c8da664af3ea1a10fa8b8da3cf6988f0442ebb57cb5011c7de06f","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:10a5bae26d3c8da664af3ea1a10fa8b8da3cf6988f0442ebb57cb5011c7de06f"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-25T20:26:13Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:YVDWE34UGGI3H57B36RNMADRTJ","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"8934a7c69321f3ed3b134abcfd6e7f53f1156f1e13dde036cf45b534af80efb4","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","title_canon_sha256":"5972e8ac4d3b93e44b9bc4601eb12cf99e15b6ab773f51968a6f1c48f491a9c4"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13053","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13053v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13053","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YVDWE34UGGI3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YVDWE34UGGI3H57B","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YVDWE34U","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:10a5bae26d3c8da664af3ea1a10fa8b8da3cf6988f0442ebb57cb5011c7de06f","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Our reproducibility study reveals a granularity gap, where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details, while our replicability analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation. Furthermore, we find that performance gains are often driven more by the capacity of the LLM backbone than by specific architectural innovations."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The chosen seven methods and three architectural families are representative of the broader CRS literature, and the single standardized preprocessing pipeline adopted here is the correct reference point against which all prior results should be judged."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Standardized re-evaluation of CRS methods on ReDial finds that nearly half of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts absent in novelty-focused tests, performance tracks LLM capacity more than architecture, and traditional recall overstates conversational utility."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty."}],"snapshot_sha256":"28ac9178718383bcad7e776140dc1b9de283399a7bb04e0f8cd14fce6ed89f8d"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Recent years have seen a surge of research into conversational recommender systems (CRS). Among existing datasets, ReDial is the most widely used benchmark, cited in hundreds of studies. However, variations in how the dataset is preprocessed and used in experiments, particularly in the definition of ground-truth items, make it difficult to compare results across studies. These comparisons are further complicated by confounding factors such as the choice of the underlying large language model (LLM) and the use of external data sources. In this work, we revisit seven prominent CRS methods across","authors_text":"Ivica Kostric, Krisztian Balog","cross_cats":[],"headline":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","title":"A Standardized Re-evaluation of Conversational Recommender Systems on the ReDial Dataset"},"references":{"count":22,"internal_anchors":1,"resolved_work":22,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Nolwenn Bernard and Krisztian Balog. 2025. Limitations of Current Evaluation Practices for Conversational Recommender Systems and the Potential of User Simulation. InProceedings of the 2025 Annual Int","work_id":"ddeb2d4c-9294-487c-883e-182ff42a2669","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Qibin Chen, Junyang Lin, Yichang Zhang, Ming Ding, Yukuo Cen, Hongxia Yang, and Jie Tang. 2019. Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog System. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Me","work_id":"a86eb56f-b267-4ad8-be88-7bb28041229f","year":2019},{"cited_arxiv_id":"2305.14314","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":3,"title":"QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs","work_id":"d3fdf68e-3a5e-48b5-8a18-7a9137479c55","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Simone Boglio, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach","work_id":"3ac291bb-48db-4fcd-905b-31730fa5b967","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Research.ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.39, 2 (2021), 20:1–20:49","work_id":"721c4ad5-1fa1-4ee9-ac9e-04b0d033447c","year":2021}],"snapshot_sha256":"29fccc88b8bfe1383ee65c29a4acff395a05059c86d16822cc7e8d90554d8a46"},"source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:33:10.205502Z","id":"941323af-af85-4720-bff5-9559a55d5512","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Standardized re-evaluation of CRS methods on ReDial finds that nearly half of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts absent in novelty-focused tests, performance tracks LLM capacity more than architecture, and traditional recall overstates conversational utility.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Standardized tests on ReDial show that nearly half of reported CRS accuracy comes from repetition shortcuts rather than architectural advances or novelty.","strongest_claim":"Our reproducibility study reveals a granularity gap, where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details, while our replicability analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation. Furthermore, we find that performance gains are often driven more by the capacity of the LLM backbone than by specific architectural innovations.","weakest_assumption":"The chosen seven methods and three architectural families are representative of the broader CRS literature, and the single standardized preprocessing pipeline adopted here is the correct reference point against which all prior results should be judged."}},"verdict_id":"941323af-af85-4720-bff5-9559a55d5512"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:a2e17d560065fb1a3a799a39c46379325692d136e47598f9cffed407b8693389","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"8934a7c69321f3ed3b134abcfd6e7f53f1156f1e13dde036cf45b534af80efb4","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:20:43Z","title_canon_sha256":"5972e8ac4d3b93e44b9bc4601eb12cf99e15b6ab773f51968a6f1c48f491a9c4"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13053","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"c547626f943191b3f7e1dfa2d600719a611ffcc0f587672b07830f8dd3dfc064","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"c547626f943191b3f7e1dfa2d600719a611ffcc0f587672b07830f8dd3dfc064","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.256717Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.256717Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"+GqKKga6oWVAD19H81dOoEl6zJza8yXyXW0ae4YKGg87z44szknwiSCkWw7ZBH8U+HtRit4sG6ws3ytp0v/tDw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:08:59.257524Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.13053","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:a2e17d560065fb1a3a799a39c46379325692d136e47598f9cffed407b8693389","sha256:10a5bae26d3c8da664af3ea1a10fa8b8da3cf6988f0442ebb57cb5011c7de06f"],"state_sha256":"56f28b1511190169b23e2c89a3a7efcd6d3bca3a4a14d77cbd2d1e651ea953b8"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"gdGi2gFjwqxASodS0Gi6/Id9Dwomppli3OZ+vbm5xQWeMYG2jFjt0IF/L54TzMdVe0O9zTLHzx5ldJ9w6tQtCQ==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-25T20:26:13.006046Z","bundle_sha256":"21333c027afbb59e516e1763935e1d5fcf238cf53d72a4fe8694169e556d0662"}}