{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG","short_pith_number":"pith:YWL5L3BM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c597d5ec2c8d95f2126a053bdb83f281ab06f4ba52ee9c216bdeec9c98193bd1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.16824","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Confidence Geometry Reveals Trace-Level Correctness in Large Language Model Reasoning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs form low-dimensional geometries that separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces without using question or text content.","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ding Liu, Shi-Ju Ran, Shuo Liu","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T05:57:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) generate not only reasoning text, but also token-level confidence trajectories that record how uncertainty evolves during inference. Whether these trajectories are relevant to reasoning correctness remains unclear. Here we show that confidence trajectories encode a content-agnostic confidence geometry associated with trace-level final-answer correctness. Using only token-level confidence values, without access to the input question, reasoning text, hidden states, or external verifiers, we find that low-dimensional representations of confidence trajectories separate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.16824","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T05:57:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"2f60d239e717102168fbc9d854150d6736dca42974dc85134ff1492f763d4d03","abstract_canon_sha256":"076a6624ab838da8b08dc2461a7151832c8763030ca32bb3b8b238ddc853a2cc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.519356Z","signature_b64":"MYnf6TXLMMn5GbELkUs+pEBrlL6eHGs+iiV8QrvWWQWL0BNDWJKzZpD1MzKfOPhkf+e3W5Af10GuIcXgvFRtAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c597d5ec2c8d95f2126a053bdb83f281ab06f4ba52ee9c216bdeec9c98193bd1","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518186Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518186Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Confidence Geometry Reveals Trace-Level Correctness in Large Language Model Reasoning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs form low-dimensional geometries that separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces without using question or text content.","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ding Liu, Shi-Ju Ran, Shuo Liu","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T05:57:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) generate not only reasoning text, but also token-level confidence trajectories that record how uncertainty evolves during inference. Whether these trajectories are relevant to reasoning correctness remains unclear. Here we show that confidence trajectories encode a content-agnostic confidence geometry associated with trace-level final-answer correctness. Using only token-level confidence values, without access to the input question, reasoning text, hidden states, or external verifiers, we find that low-dimensional representations of confidence trajectories separate"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Using only token-level confidence values, without access to the input question, reasoning text, hidden states, or external verifiers, low-dimensional representations of confidence trajectories separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the observed low-dimensional separation arises specifically from trace-level correctness rather than from other correlated properties of the generation process such as length, token distribution, or model-specific artifacts, and that this separation generalizes beyond the three evaluated benchmarks without content information.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs encode a content-agnostic geometry that separates correct and incorrect reasoning traces and supports a lightweight correctness estimator called NeuralConf.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs form low-dimensional geometries that separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces without using question or text content.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"6f8d105ae6415ed8f6673440e7d7bd04a4cf4028724b3ef01bf8f72402750ce3"},"source":{"id":"2605.16824","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"8aed55bb-914b-4a39-acab-eaa6d0d3ffdc","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T20:50:25.533304Z","strongest_claim":"Using only token-level confidence values, without access to the input question, reasoning text, hidden states, or external verifiers, low-dimensional representations of confidence trajectories separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces.","one_line_summary":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs encode a content-agnostic geometry that separates correct and incorrect reasoning traces and supports a lightweight correctness estimator called NeuralConf.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the observed low-dimensional separation arises specifically from trace-level correctness rather than from other correlated properties of the generation process such as length, token distribution, or model-specific artifacts, and that this separation generalizes beyond the three evaluated benchmarks without content information.","pith_extraction_headline":"Token-level confidence trajectories in LLMs form low-dimensional geometries that separate correct from incorrect reasoning traces without using question or text content."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16824/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:01:26.409011Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:01:19.265439Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:01:56.265002Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.407531Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"655da22412969dd94f9148298f2ca415cf61f0164ae069d3574bf243a6a18302"},"references":{"count":32,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Chain-of- thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,","work_id":"a072c1ae-ca12-411a-8ff7-c501d9d89c6a","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Large language models are zero-shot reasoners,","work_id":"3117d03a-1cd7-4a6d-b581-fc15bce9a095","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models,","work_id":"b11eff8b-8a5f-4338-ba00-0eb3459b4f6d","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models,","work_id":"d3947bab-e558-4cac-90db-f5bfb5eb3e31","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,","work_id":"c4646d28-69bb-440a-9038-a4bed3a63804","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":32,"snapshot_sha256":"c1a6d303708631bc547fbd0cea936b53908e1ca4246bf729e7525f2aa4e9ead4","internal_anchors":7},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16824","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16824v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16824","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YWL5L3BMRWK7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YWL5L3BMRWK7EETK","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YWL5L3BM","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YWL5L3BM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YWL5L3BM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.16824&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YWL5L3BMRWK7EETKAU55XA7SQG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:24.518574+00:00"}