{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW","short_pith_number":"pith:YX2S2WLH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c5f52d5967495e1eba5a67f3360cbc859b8d5b0638367825ef91c099f5717124","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.18129","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Apratim Mishra, Haejin Lee, Jana Diesner, Jinseok Kim, Shubhanshu Mishra, Zhiwen You","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gender biases in scholarly metrics remain a persistent concern, despite numerous bibliometric studies exploring their presence and absence across productivity, impact, acknowledgment, and self-citations. However, methodological inconsistencies, particularly in author name disambiguation and gender identification, limit the reliability and comparability of these studies, potentially perpetuating misperceptions and hindering effective interventions. A review of 70 relevant publications over the past 12 years reveals a wide range of approaches, from name-based and manual searches to more algorith"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.18129","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"9bafa2cf88a9700a6abf78f85d5bfe7abec9eb1d3879a17f335dddf9f06525fa","abstract_canon_sha256":"dc1561b69ef279a68f6531c8ecd2343898cbb95c9b8f8d8d5fa32987c0fd690e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.620243Z","signature_b64":"1B+7OYHo4RXUnMdt0CLgutDobn1y+KGCcwiZfZPZ6+f8TQwMFB1sZqnaeQHvSBpUCrXdCG3uryjiG6cwaaASAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c5f52d5967495e1eba5a67f3360cbc859b8d5b0638367825ef91c099f5717124","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619814Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619814Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Apratim Mishra, Haejin Lee, Jana Diesner, Jinseok Kim, Shubhanshu Mishra, Zhiwen You","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gender biases in scholarly metrics remain a persistent concern, despite numerous bibliometric studies exploring their presence and absence across productivity, impact, acknowledgment, and self-citations. However, methodological inconsistencies, particularly in author name disambiguation and gender identification, limit the reliability and comparability of these studies, potentially perpetuating misperceptions and hindering effective interventions. A review of 70 relevant publications over the past 12 years reveals a wide range of approaches, from name-based and manual searches to more algorith"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.18129","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.18129/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.18129","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.18129v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.18129","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YX2S2WLHJFPB","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YX2S2WLH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YX2S2WLH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YX2S2WLH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.18129&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YX2S2WLHJFPB5OS2M7ZTMDF4QW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:07:07.619875+00:00"}