{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL","short_pith_number":"pith:YXRUPWHI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c5e347d8e8f8f4258b34d9be108f7902c3754fa0392a20e7f11152d771719371","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.04118","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ProtDBench: A Unified Benchmark of Protein Binder Design and Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"A new benchmark for protein binder design shows that common structure prediction models disagree substantially on which designs succeed under identical rules.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.QM","authors_text":"Chengyue Gong, Cong Liu, Jiaqi Guan, Jinyuan Sun, Milong Ren, Wenzhi Xiao, Xinshi Chen","submitted_at":"2026-05-05T11:48:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in de novo protein binder design have enabled increasing experimental validation, yet reported in silico metrics remain difficult to interpret or compare across studies due to non-standardized evaluation protocols. We introduce ProtDBench, a standardized and throughput-aware evaluation framework for protein binder design. ProtDBench defines unified benchmark tasks, evaluation protocols, and success criteria, enabling systematic analysis of how evaluation design influences observed performance. Using a large wet-lab annotated dataset, we analyze commonly used structure predictio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.04118","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-bio.QM","submitted_at":"2026-05-05T11:48:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"29ff778fc392f8d1cc0d4cccd4cc6a6ff4f34f38282127e94d7386357ab61d32","abstract_canon_sha256":"9bc5302669094ee96b4db6b9698023741e2216b324eb8f9eafe8add32dfaabc2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241791Z","signature_b64":"U3FC9CenPMFp3dO9hwwoCHwLXGdTsg3PnBxye+dxF6Ks0GQtFPp0CbetlL+LhbrCU37ALdYZtka4dBo89eKDDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c5e347d8e8f8f4258b34d9be108f7902c3754fa0392a20e7f11152d771719371","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241048Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241048Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ProtDBench: A Unified Benchmark of Protein Binder Design and Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"A new benchmark for protein binder design shows that common structure prediction models disagree substantially on which designs succeed under identical rules.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.QM","authors_text":"Chengyue Gong, Cong Liu, Jiaqi Guan, Jinyuan Sun, Milong Ren, Wenzhi Xiao, Xinshi Chen","submitted_at":"2026-05-05T11:48:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in de novo protein binder design have enabled increasing experimental validation, yet reported in silico metrics remain difficult to interpret or compare across studies due to non-standardized evaluation protocols. We introduce ProtDBench, a standardized and throughput-aware evaluation framework for protein binder design. ProtDBench defines unified benchmark tasks, evaluation protocols, and success criteria, enabling systematic analysis of how evaluation design influences observed performance. Using a large wet-lab annotated dataset, we analyze commonly used structure predictio"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Using a large wet-lab annotated dataset, we analyze commonly used structure prediction models as evaluation verifiers, revealing substantial verifier-dependent bias and limited agreement under identical filtering protocols. ... Overall, ProtDBench provides a fair and reproducible evaluation pipeline that supports systematic and controlled comparison of protein binder design methods under realistic evaluation settings.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the defined success criteria, filtering protocols, and wet-lab annotated dataset accurately reflect real experimental binder performance and provide a representative basis for benchmarking.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"ProtDBench standardizes protein binder design evaluation using wet-lab data, exposing verifier biases, metric dependencies, and trade-offs between success rate, speed, and structural diversity.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A new benchmark for protein binder design shows that common structure prediction models disagree substantially on which designs succeed under identical rules.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"75e6ef31d6837543ba092d650fe111d71d724b28c36cea7f8a9cd14f537e5132"},"source":{"id":"2605.04118","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"f144bf74-40b8-4ca1-88b0-b1ae56f84e27","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-08T18:09:03.659188Z","strongest_claim":"Using a large wet-lab annotated dataset, we analyze commonly used structure prediction models as evaluation verifiers, revealing substantial verifier-dependent bias and limited agreement under identical filtering protocols. ... Overall, ProtDBench provides a fair and reproducible evaluation pipeline that supports systematic and controlled comparison of protein binder design methods under realistic evaluation settings.","one_line_summary":"ProtDBench standardizes protein binder design evaluation using wet-lab data, exposing verifier biases, metric dependencies, and trade-offs between success rate, speed, and structural diversity.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the defined success criteria, filtering protocols, and wet-lab annotated dataset accurately reflect real experimental binder performance and provide a representative basis for benchmarking.","pith_extraction_headline":"A new benchmark for protein binder design shows that common structure prediction models disagree substantially on which designs succeed under identical rules."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.04118/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-20T13:36:39.248387Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T00:31:21.665980Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T15:07:27.199343Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"9522f94c1f930f5201dea4bd8886f4758b5b7e2598cc6a2a986b8e861c421d81"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":3,"snapshot_sha256":"ff35b7430ce1419199860890142a12cc8dd08fe311b31a58b6e9832801aa4498"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.04118","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.04118v2","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.04118","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YXRUPWHI7D2C","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YXRUPWHI","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":3,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YXRUPWHI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YXRUPWHI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.04118&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YXRUPWHI7D2CLCZU3G7BBD3ZAL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:16.241148+00:00"}