{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ","short_pith_number":"pith:YYYSENF7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c6312234bf02b89409c7113c835958640ea841a95ee319ffef00659bb5e19927","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15810","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Axiomatizing logics of finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"Natural axiomatic extensions fail to restore completeness for modal Gödel logics over finite Gödel-Kripke models.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Amanda Vidal, Ricardo O. Rodriguez","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T10:04:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"We investigate completeness for modal G\\\"odel logics with respect to finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models, along with related aspects. It is well known that the logics studied in [4, 11] fail to be complete with respect to finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models. We show that the natural candidate axiomatic extensions do not restore completeness, thereby resolving a 15 year open problem posed in the aforementioned works. We then provide new axiomatizations that are complete for finite models and characterize intermediate witnessing conditions that hold for the basic logics."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15810","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T10:04:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"73472ff1dc87319afd5e32be95d36c61b170d25a04aa40c2b61d173857f4335f","abstract_canon_sha256":"42e37bce10d8d6dd5a8795cfb57fa98c67013494b2fded1b9ddd2a5e641a18b0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.703051Z","signature_b64":"EvjZE4AU8b+8nM7XHU4GaLXYp+L65vGeNXYioUU4aOXoqNat5RCuGjgGybR8G/bIg0r594KoMgWURofgp4gPAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c6312234bf02b89409c7113c835958640ea841a95ee319ffef00659bb5e19927","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702337Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702337Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Axiomatizing logics of finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"Natural axiomatic extensions fail to restore completeness for modal Gödel logics over finite Gödel-Kripke models.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Amanda Vidal, Ricardo O. Rodriguez","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T10:04:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"We investigate completeness for modal G\\\"odel logics with respect to finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models, along with related aspects. It is well known that the logics studied in [4, 11] fail to be complete with respect to finite G\\\"odel-Kripke models. We show that the natural candidate axiomatic extensions do not restore completeness, thereby resolving a 15 year open problem posed in the aforementioned works. We then provide new axiomatizations that are complete for finite models and characterize intermediate witnessing conditions that hold for the basic logics."},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The natural candidate axiomatic extensions do not restore completeness with respect to finite Gödel-Kripke models, thereby resolving a 15 year open problem. New axiomatizations are provided that are complete for finite models and characterize intermediate witnessing conditions that hold for the basic logics.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that the specific modal Gödel logics studied in references [4,11] are the right starting point and that finite Gödel-Kripke models form the intended class of structures for which completeness is sought.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Resolves open problem by proving natural extensions of modal Gödel logics are incomplete for finite models and supplies new complete axiomatizations.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Natural axiomatic extensions fail to restore completeness for modal Gödel logics over finite Gödel-Kripke models.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"fe2e9f8981dbf7bba4151557a061f244ff7604094c555d3f83f6a56883abb716"},"source":{"id":"2605.15810","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"7f50c853-b48a-4d32-9382-34284b7f6e19","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T19:46:42.267359Z","strongest_claim":"The natural candidate axiomatic extensions do not restore completeness with respect to finite Gödel-Kripke models, thereby resolving a 15 year open problem. New axiomatizations are provided that are complete for finite models and characterize intermediate witnessing conditions that hold for the basic logics.","one_line_summary":"Resolves open problem by proving natural extensions of modal Gödel logics are incomplete for finite models and supplies new complete axiomatizations.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that the specific modal Gödel logics studied in references [4,11] are the right starting point and that finite Gödel-Kripke models form the intended class of structures for which completeness is sought.","pith_extraction_headline":"Natural axiomatic extensions fail to restore completeness for modal Gödel logics over finite Gödel-Kripke models."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.15810/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:01:19.140612Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:01:13.801490Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T17:33:48.732665Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T17:21:55.888928Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"c42c49d64f9027157f7d730b41b12ca3db307273f39558b6816982a6cb958e77"},"references":{"count":15,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"M. Baaz and R. Iemhoff. Skolemization in intermediate logics with the finite model property.Logic Journal of the IGPL, 24(3):224–237, 2016","work_id":"3619f300-5fed-47e2-9e51-c3000c467c91","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"F. Bou, F. Esteva, L. Godo, and R.O. Rodriguez. Possibilistic semantics for a modal KD45 extension of G¨ odel fuzzy logic. In J. P. et. at. Carvalho, editor,IPMU, pages 123–135, Cham, 2016. Springer I","work_id":"c608fa3b-9348-4959-bb40-fccb2b4528f5","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"X. Caicedo, G. Metcalfe, R.O. Rodriguez, and J. Rogger. Decidability of order-based modal logics. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 88:53 – 74, 2017","work_id":"3765efa3-4cbf-4b0d-9f31-7b6342a60a67","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"X. Caicedo and R.O. Rodriguez. Standard G¨ odel modal logics.Studia Logica, 94(2):189–214, 2010","work_id":"1b1f4f1c-cac3-4482-bea5-089ae3a49814","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2015,"title":"X. Caicedo and R.O. Rodriguez. Bi-modal G¨ odel logic over [0, 1]-valued Kripke frames.Journal of Logic and Computation, 25(1):37–55, 2015","work_id":"01b7c30a-141a-4feb-8bef-e3d97e2f0be0","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":15,"snapshot_sha256":"e6b5e1b7254f45fc5e27a503982e353000373764ef475d74124425772ec8a6e5","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"fad8c5e44ec3144449e04fb830025598e333fcc801ef38513bc9bb4214ad7616"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15810","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15810v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15810","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YYYSENF7AK4J","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YYYSENF7AK4JICOH","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YYYSENF7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YYYSENF7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YYYSENF7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.15810&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YYYSENF7AK4JICOHCE6IGWKYMQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:19.702450+00:00"}