{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU","short_pith_number":"pith:Z44XBXNZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cf3970ddb9b73c81d7c8dd3acd9650853c79972606b043ef3ab31d42cb4ae2a9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1206.2350","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hydrodynamical Simulations to Determine the Feeding Rate of Black Holes by the Tidal Disruption of Stars: The Importance of the Impact Parameter and Stellar Structure","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz (1) ((1) UC Santa Cruz), James Guillochon (1)","submitted_at":"2012-06-11T20:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The disruption of stars by supermassive black holes has been linked to more than a dozen flares in the cores of galaxies out to redshift $z \\sim 0.4$. Modeling these flares properly requires a prediction of the rate of mass return to the black hole after a disruption. Through hydrodynamical simulation, we show that aside from the full disruption of a solar mass star at the exact limit where the star is destroyed, the common assumptions used to estimate $\\dot{M}(t)$, the rate of mass return to the black hole, are largely invalid. While the analytical approximation to tidal disruption predicts t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1206.2350","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2012-06-11T20:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4580d95f397fd91dfe5f48e179820b837041c2a1178703246be9514aac10be01","abstract_canon_sha256":"3538063d99e4216273c4ed30157c6b0048928b4d779d6ae09ae038bcb50e08f1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.729093Z","signature_b64":"9IKDwSWP7eOfD1CaCxBvjJdPbWeX33+mbOy4lkYPT9znTX7QHowFbYmZrOiH6r765vmmdFCSQXaZiLChjKR3DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cf3970ddb9b73c81d7c8dd3acd9650853c79972606b043ef3ab31d42cb4ae2a9","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728706Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728706Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hydrodynamical Simulations to Determine the Feeding Rate of Black Holes by the Tidal Disruption of Stars: The Importance of the Impact Parameter and Stellar Structure","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz (1) ((1) UC Santa Cruz), James Guillochon (1)","submitted_at":"2012-06-11T20:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The disruption of stars by supermassive black holes has been linked to more than a dozen flares in the cores of galaxies out to redshift $z \\sim 0.4$. Modeling these flares properly requires a prediction of the rate of mass return to the black hole after a disruption. Through hydrodynamical simulation, we show that aside from the full disruption of a solar mass star at the exact limit where the star is destroyed, the common assumptions used to estimate $\\dot{M}(t)$, the rate of mass return to the black hole, are largely invalid. While the analytical approximation to tidal disruption predicts t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1206.2350","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1206.2350","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1206.2350v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1206.2350","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Z44XBXNZW46I","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:30.460161+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:30.460161+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Z44XBXNZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:30.460161+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20327","citing_title":"On the origin of anomalous dissipation in simulations of tidal disruption events","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14433","citing_title":"Where Do Hot Jupiters Come From? Revisiting Tidal Disruption and Ejection in High-Eccentricity Migration","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z44XBXNZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z44XBXNZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1206.2350&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Z44XBXNZW46IDV6I3U5M3FSQQU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728769+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:56:59.728769+00:00"}