{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR","short_pith_number":"pith:Z4CRCT4J","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cf05114f89fa89340ccf18dc39e2223c44fec3bab367529beaddfe11ed8b1457","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.07892","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Consistent eccentricities for gravitational wave astronomy: Resolving discrepancies between astrophysical simulations and waveform models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Aditya Vijaykumar, Alexandra G. Hanselman, Michael Zevin","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T18:55:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting imprints of orbital eccentricity in GW signals promises to shed light on the formation mechanisms of binary black holes. To constrain formation mechanisms, distributions of eccentricity derived from numerical simulations of astrophysical formation channels are compared to the estimates of eccentricity inferred from GW signals. We report that the definition of eccentricity typically used in astrophysical simulations is inconsistent with the one used while modeling GW signals, with the differences mainly arising due to the choice of reference frequency used in both cases. We also posit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.07892","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T18:55:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"ec4c8da0993c12bb6f9d0299ea6f52652957dea655a9b9ed03c5a3e76e6f7015","abstract_canon_sha256":"c4bed0e8d6c459153213983e3213249013361ee0c2344f7bcf6efac9ddc870b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195573Z","signature_b64":"Lj3raq8DXUrYKBF8/77ICHNyKHEmgyUYORHQ8QS3z8D2KmzwHlQIdrur584+Zg6bF8tfOxQkRe+nE6iaH4SSDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cf05114f89fa89340ccf18dc39e2223c44fec3bab367529beaddfe11ed8b1457","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195061Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195061Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Consistent eccentricities for gravitational wave astronomy: Resolving discrepancies between astrophysical simulations and waveform models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Aditya Vijaykumar, Alexandra G. Hanselman, Michael Zevin","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T18:55:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting imprints of orbital eccentricity in GW signals promises to shed light on the formation mechanisms of binary black holes. To constrain formation mechanisms, distributions of eccentricity derived from numerical simulations of astrophysical formation channels are compared to the estimates of eccentricity inferred from GW signals. We report that the definition of eccentricity typically used in astrophysical simulations is inconsistent with the one used while modeling GW signals, with the differences mainly arising due to the choice of reference frequency used in both cases. We also posit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.07892","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.07892/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.07892","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.07892v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.07892","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Z4CRCT4J7KET","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Z4CRCT4J","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2404.14286","citing_title":"Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00124","citing_title":"Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00124","citing_title":"Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z4CRCT4J"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z4CRCT4J","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.07892&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4CRCT4J7KETIDGPDDODTYRCHR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:02.195118+00:00"}