{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK","short_pith_number":"pith:Z4KHN35P","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cf1476efafa9a701da4d2d7b58df0faa8c42784ed482a548909e3ff67b4eef1c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.11712","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Modelling Political Coalition Negotiations Using LLM-based Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Farhad Moghimifar, Gholamreza Haffari, Robert Thomson, Yuan-Fang Li","submitted_at":"2024-02-18T21:28:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Coalition negotiations are a cornerstone of parliamentary democracies, characterised by complex interactions and strategic communications among political parties. Despite its significance, the modelling of these negotiations has remained unexplored with the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP), mostly due to lack of proper data. In this paper, we introduce coalition negotiations as a novel NLP task, and model it as a negotiation between large language model-based agents. We introduce a multilingual dataset, POLCA, comprising manifestos of European political parties and coalition agreeme"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.11712","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-18T21:28:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ff8640ca606c03e7fa8675611f0bb4b47c2e546f11716f6aac4b82b5ffa8240d","abstract_canon_sha256":"b2356149bf38c3226fa39ec82ffaf56f50833cd774342e1f11e0405d3a5251c0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467515Z","signature_b64":"5tETpe607J0dQDBaX0GcDCRl4+r+tOne6L+SX47WtXIqzbcviVHPP9yu9TU+PchxhqLMJcMkCey2mbxHOYEMCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cf1476efafa9a701da4d2d7b58df0faa8c42784ed482a548909e3ff67b4eef1c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467021Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467021Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Modelling Political Coalition Negotiations Using LLM-based Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Farhad Moghimifar, Gholamreza Haffari, Robert Thomson, Yuan-Fang Li","submitted_at":"2024-02-18T21:28:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Coalition negotiations are a cornerstone of parliamentary democracies, characterised by complex interactions and strategic communications among political parties. Despite its significance, the modelling of these negotiations has remained unexplored with the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP), mostly due to lack of proper data. In this paper, we introduce coalition negotiations as a novel NLP task, and model it as a negotiation between large language model-based agents. We introduce a multilingual dataset, POLCA, comprising manifestos of European political parties and coalition agreeme"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.11712","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.11712/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.11712","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.11712v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.11712","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Z4KHN35PVGTQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Z4KHN35P","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.05876","citing_title":"Information Bargaining: Bilateral Commitment in Bayesian Persuasion","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z4KHN35P"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z4KHN35P","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.11712&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Z4KHN35PVGTQDWSNFV5VRXYPVK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:43.467079+00:00"}