{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ","short_pith_number":"pith:Z6GXAA5G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cf8d7003a6f2592bba34883a9992c04e787e2e4dfa1d27fad7c43b2175caa9ae","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2303.13988","version":6},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Machine Psychology","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew Lampinen, Eric Schulz, Ishita Dasgupta, Jane X. Wang, Marcel Binz, Stephanie C.Y. Chan, Thilo Hagendorff, Zeynep Akata","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T13:24:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) show increasingly advanced emergent capabilities and are being incorporated across various societal domains. Understanding their behavior and reasoning abilities therefore holds significant importance. We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging LLMs in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology that have traditionally been aimed at understanding human cognition and behavior. In this article, we highlight and summarize theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. I"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2303.13988","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T13:24:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"2e342d64c87ede88b03f6100a97ff12e438f3eea3a9a3197b44bd266b5b922c9","abstract_canon_sha256":"6a6df2a138868ba228987a3760b9958470dea887950b2cc55ac5c67f8a89ccf5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529722Z","signature_b64":"2BUQEnHXyfZxFmt9EczxWnD3p9uPtqP+SQ9NMcyfelrQkwLoyt4vbElp+fNOWvw5TmNUDx20T2c9jy8686oWCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cf8d7003a6f2592bba34883a9992c04e787e2e4dfa1d27fad7c43b2175caa9ae","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529228Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529228Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Machine Psychology","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew Lampinen, Eric Schulz, Ishita Dasgupta, Jane X. Wang, Marcel Binz, Stephanie C.Y. Chan, Thilo Hagendorff, Zeynep Akata","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T13:24:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) show increasingly advanced emergent capabilities and are being incorporated across various societal domains. Understanding their behavior and reasoning abilities therefore holds significant importance. We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging LLMs in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology that have traditionally been aimed at understanding human cognition and behavior. In this article, we highlight and summarize theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. I"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2303.13988","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2303.13988/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2303.13988","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2303.13988v6","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.13988","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Z6GXAA5G6JMS","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Z6GXAA5G","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":16,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26529","citing_title":"The inattentional gap in task conditioned AI models that omit otherwise reportable safety critical signals","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21037","citing_title":"Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01637","citing_title":"Easier to Mislead Than to Correct: Harmful and Beneficial Revision in LLM Conformity","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28770","citing_title":"Mechanistic Personality Analysis of LLMs Steering Personality via Latent Feature Interventions","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06506","citing_title":"The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.11567","citing_title":"Consumer Law for AI Agents","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.13324","citing_title":"Designing Psychometric Bias Measures for ChatBots: An Application to Racial Bias Measurement","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.03295","citing_title":"Language Model Goal Selection Differs from Humans' in a Self-Directed Learning Task","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.11974","citing_title":"Normative Common Ground Replication (NormCoRe): Replication-by-Translation for Studying Norms in Multi-Agent AI","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16343","citing_title":"Elder-Sim: A Psychometrically Validated Platform for Personality-Stable Elderly Digital Twins","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12412","citing_title":"Stories in Space: In-Context Learning Trajectories in Conceptual Belief Space","ref_index":198,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27673","citing_title":"The TEA Nets framework combines AI and cognitive network science to model targets, events and actors in text","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09773","citing_title":"Exploitation Without Deception: Dark Triad Feature Steering Reveals Separable Antisocial Circuits in Language Models","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06506","citing_title":"The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08060","citing_title":"The Memory Curse: How Expanded Recall Erodes Cooperative Intent in LLM Agents","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16755","citing_title":"Machine individuality: Separating genuine idiosyncrasy from response bias in large language models","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z6GXAA5G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z6GXAA5G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2303.13988&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6GXAA5G6JMSXORURA5JTEWAJZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:15.529291+00:00"}