{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC","short_pith_number":"pith:Z6LIDQE2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cf9681c09a481cf831b75e758871c2b89536be16c943aeb545a2a2198ffc32f9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.00516","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is the information loss problem a paradox?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Francesco Di Filippo, Luca Buoninfante","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T08:07:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"The aim of this chapter is twofold. First, we introduce the information loss problem; second, we provide a critical assessment by thoroughly inspecting the assumptions underlying its formulations. In particular, we argue that if we work in the regime of validity of semiclassical gravity and do not add additional assumptions that are not necessary for the Hawking calculation, the answer to the question in the title is NO. In other words, the black hole evaporation is certainly unitary as predicted by quantum field theory in curved spacetime. However, if additional assumptions are added, such as"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.00516","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T08:07:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"a6dc9ea2e138461003284e17ea6aefd4bec247d65fd5337ae045f7e134573696","abstract_canon_sha256":"215e06b17c7721d497b5862e9203f88120f704302087eb7db3503e45daa6b931"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367524Z","signature_b64":"2Lhx4ET6KYG/rLkfZ1uIG7HnLPxMlIVBdHAIai3/+38y6TRWVnqx4fWPNKA1LNSUxQJp6cbedRagl6xrRIoOAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cf9681c09a481cf831b75e758871c2b89536be16c943aeb545a2a2198ffc32f9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367048Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367048Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is the information loss problem a paradox?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Francesco Di Filippo, Luca Buoninfante","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T08:07:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"The aim of this chapter is twofold. First, we introduce the information loss problem; second, we provide a critical assessment by thoroughly inspecting the assumptions underlying its formulations. In particular, we argue that if we work in the regime of validity of semiclassical gravity and do not add additional assumptions that are not necessary for the Hawking calculation, the answer to the question in the title is NO. In other words, the black hole evaporation is certainly unitary as predicted by quantum field theory in curved spacetime. However, if additional assumptions are added, such as"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.00516","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.00516/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.00516","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.00516v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.00516","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Z6LIDQE2JAOP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Z6LIDQE2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08661","citing_title":"The Remnant of an Evaporating Rotating Regular Black Hole from the Generalized Entropy in the Final Stage of Evaporation","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z6LIDQE2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Z6LIDQE2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.00516&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Z6LIDQE2JAOPQMNXLZ2YQ4OCXC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:46.367113+00:00"}