{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF","short_pith_number":"pith:ZBZO3GVX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c872ed9ab7220a5bb5c3e8116aff7561680903872d68e2006763a7dbd031807d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.02092","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Human and Machine: How Software Engineers Perceive and Engage with AI-Assisted Code Reviews Compared to Their Peers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Adam Alami, Neil A. Ernst","submitted_at":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to increase and evolve, including in software engineering (SE). This integration involves processes traditionally entrusted to humans, such as coding. However, the impact on socio-technical processes like code review remains underexplored. In this interview-based study (20 interviewees), we investigate how software engineers perceive and engage with Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted code reviews compared to human peer-led reviews. In this inherently human-centric process, we aim to understand how software engineers navigate the introd"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.02092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2a6e466abaee510d7becf7d199fde95af165a901236c2ba2f78c78d56fc4a58a","abstract_canon_sha256":"0d2c374aa9ca9d03010564f5e76f934e54e5afd91e41ffe90166eb2134d8ad79"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003721Z","signature_b64":"9KIgofRhO15oUsiOJZfeXo/KUrXX4bK2E6+MLqpkP5QYGmpqhr2Y1lYNRsLou0RmbIKhB7m2/K55jCmIZ6aKAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c872ed9ab7220a5bb5c3e8116aff7561680903872d68e2006763a7dbd031807d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003243Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003243Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Human and Machine: How Software Engineers Perceive and Engage with AI-Assisted Code Reviews Compared to Their Peers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Adam Alami, Neil A. Ernst","submitted_at":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to increase and evolve, including in software engineering (SE). This integration involves processes traditionally entrusted to humans, such as coding. However, the impact on socio-technical processes like code review remains underexplored. In this interview-based study (20 interviewees), we investigate how software engineers perceive and engage with Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted code reviews compared to human peer-led reviews. In this inherently human-centric process, we aim to understand how software engineers navigate the introd"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.02092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.02092/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.02092","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.02092v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.02092","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZBZO3GVXEIFF","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZBZO3GVX","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22534","citing_title":"Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZBZO3GVX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZBZO3GVX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.02092&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZBZO3GVXEIFFXNOD5AIWV73VMF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:02.003299+00:00"}