{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3","short_pith_number":"pith:ZCLD7VEG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c8963fd486c7a9d9fddc7aff39171e66f4ae4f686e70eb7004b427572c8f5354","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.04920","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DB"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Yujia Hu","submitted_at":"2024-11-07T17:57:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have majorly advanced NLP and AI, and next to their ability to perform a wide range of procedural tasks, a major success factor is their internalized factual knowledge. Since Petroni et al. (2019), analyzing this knowledge has gained attention. However, most approaches investigate one question at a time via modest-sized pre-defined samples, introducing an ``availability bias'' (Tversky&Kahnemann, 1973) that prevents the analysis of knowledge (or beliefs) of LLMs beyond the experimenter's predisposition.\n  To address this challenge, we propose a novel methodology to"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.04920","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-11-07T17:57:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.DB"],"title_canon_sha256":"980b7a0dd9606e170b8e3940d7d6d7ba8c7680e9d4593c79ab48237580b59932","abstract_canon_sha256":"c6dad0e316ea334b706d32d598fb7027b20a35d7d752f8225ee07e242c19ea0b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239917Z","signature_b64":"uc0Ih2QJdJvxvzPme7ysxitivFjxmG9sCpeNLgFfKijKBvlPVEpcSzErb2BhbrJPfaLVasebOnwsW40m6H1wAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c8963fd486c7a9d9fddc7aff39171e66f4ae4f686e70eb7004b427572c8f5354","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239452Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239452Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DB"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Yujia Hu","submitted_at":"2024-11-07T17:57:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have majorly advanced NLP and AI, and next to their ability to perform a wide range of procedural tasks, a major success factor is their internalized factual knowledge. Since Petroni et al. (2019), analyzing this knowledge has gained attention. However, most approaches investigate one question at a time via modest-sized pre-defined samples, introducing an ``availability bias'' (Tversky&Kahnemann, 1973) that prevents the analysis of knowledge (or beliefs) of LLMs beyond the experimenter's predisposition.\n  To address this challenge, we propose a novel methodology to"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.04920","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.04920/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.04920","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.04920v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.04920","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZCLD7VEGY6U5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZCLD7VEG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.10156","citing_title":"Introducing the Swiss Food Knowledge Graph: AI for Context-Aware Nutrition Recommendation","ref_index":2025,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZCLD7VEG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZCLD7VEG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.04920&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCLD7VEGY6U5T7O4PL7TSFY6M3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:40.239513+00:00"}