{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764","short_pith_number":"pith:ZCTFF5IN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c8a652f50dfb7e7a18d1d0d26f0e7ff703eadcd6ff701e2335accad96c48dcce","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2208.06046","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automated Market Making and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.OC","q-fin.PM","q-fin.PR","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.MF","authors_text":"Anthony Lee Zhang, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Jason Milionis, Tim Roughgarden","submitted_at":"2022-08-11T21:33:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the market microstructure of automated market makers (AMMs) from the perspective of liquidity providers (LPs). Our central contribution is a ``Black-Scholes formula for AMMs''. We identify the main adverse selection cost incurred by LPs, which we call ``loss-versus-rebalancing'' (LVR, pronounced ``lever''). LVR captures costs incurred by AMM LPs due to stale prices that are picked off by better informed arbitrageurs. We derive closed-form expressions for LVR applicable to all automated market makers. Our model is quantitatively realistic, matching actual LP returns empirically, and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2208.06046","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.MF","submitted_at":"2022-08-11T21:33:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.OC","q-fin.PM","q-fin.PR","q-fin.TR"],"title_canon_sha256":"8e83f250b8929ceab3f92f4bfe4969571025ce585ff4fe727cdd601104c4279f","abstract_canon_sha256":"1424ad3e4d6bddcfc3700b195af770dbd9444856528ae15f770d4ce3b18a32c3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.569029Z","signature_b64":"WzX8E9/Uma4dJs6J64dI/Cj/8uRuUsSle/TeXrAKL9ELXx1H5x802DiQujRaHW3UlG3sFE8jrVDBPJizqblSDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c8a652f50dfb7e7a18d1d0d26f0e7ff703eadcd6ff701e2335accad96c48dcce","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568600Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568600Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automated Market Making and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.OC","q-fin.PM","q-fin.PR","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.MF","authors_text":"Anthony Lee Zhang, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Jason Milionis, Tim Roughgarden","submitted_at":"2022-08-11T21:33:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the market microstructure of automated market makers (AMMs) from the perspective of liquidity providers (LPs). Our central contribution is a ``Black-Scholes formula for AMMs''. We identify the main adverse selection cost incurred by LPs, which we call ``loss-versus-rebalancing'' (LVR, pronounced ``lever''). LVR captures costs incurred by AMM LPs due to stale prices that are picked off by better informed arbitrageurs. We derive closed-form expressions for LVR applicable to all automated market makers. Our model is quantitatively realistic, matching actual LP returns empirically, and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2208.06046","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2208.06046/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2208.06046","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2208.06046v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2208.06046","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZCTFF5IN7N7H","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZCTFF5IN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":23,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08525","citing_title":"Causal Effects of Protocol-Fee Changes on Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23070","citing_title":"Mitigating Adverse Selection in Concentrated Liquidity AMMs with Dynamic Fees: An Agent-Based Model Approach","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21769","citing_title":"Optimal Dynamic Fees for Automated Market Makers: A Stochastic Control Approach to Loss-Versus-Rebalancing","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09003","citing_title":"Proof of Stake economy under centralized exchanges--a mean field model","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04959","citing_title":"Fairness and Strategy-Proofness in Automated Market Makers","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19742","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy in Glosten-Milgrom: Bid-Ask Spread and Welfare under Flip-Noise Direction Observation","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15746","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19267","citing_title":"Bounding LVR in AMMs via Secant-Tangent Divergence and Collateralized Liquidity Scaling","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25631","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy in Continuous-Time Kyle: Cumulative Welfare under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.06505","citing_title":"Amortizing Perpetual Options","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.22596","citing_title":"ParlayMarket: Automated Market Making for Parlay-style Joint Contracts","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15746","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19146","citing_title":"Designing On-Chain Options: Amortizing Perpetual Options","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19742","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy in Glosten-Milgrom: Bid-Ask Spread and Welfare under Flip-Noise Direction Observation","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17425","citing_title":"The Viability of Blockchain Markets under Discrete Clearing and Paid Priority","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15746","citing_title":"The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.04940","citing_title":"Becoming Immutable: How Ethereum is Made","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.06505","citing_title":"Amortizing Perpetual Options","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06405","citing_title":"Funding-Aware Optimal Market Making for Perpetual DEXs","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06060","citing_title":"Arbitrage and the Stability of AMM Price Tracking","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22069","citing_title":"Liquidity provision in CLMMs: evidence from transactions data","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16898","citing_title":"From Swap Axioms to Weighted Geometric Means: A Characterization of AMMs","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17579","citing_title":"Vault as a credit instrument","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZCTFF5IN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZCTFF5IN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2208.06046&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZCTFF5IN7N7HUGGR2DJG6DT764/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:51.568658+00:00"}