{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3","short_pith_number":"pith:ZDH7OWRU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c8cff75a347325174603bf4d18cb314ec11fa68cbac0df204e2fcb41600dbcf5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1911.07821","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Emilie Passemar, Stefan Schacht, Yuval Grossman","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T18:36:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We point out that testing the equality of the Cabibbo angle as extracted from $\\Gamma(K\\rightarrow \\pi l\\nu)$, the ratio $\\Gamma(K\\rightarrow l\\nu)/\\Gamma(\\pi\\rightarrow l\\nu)$ and nuclear $\\beta$ decays is not identical to a test of first row unitarity of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. The reason is that a CKM unitarity test involves only two parameters, while the degrees of freedom for the assessment of the goodness-of-fit of the universality of the Cabibbo angle entailed by the Standard Model (SM) is equal to the number of measurements minus one. Beyond the SM all different pro"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1911.07821","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T18:36:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"aa0deab032ecf6ca7aaabb0ae5b02b7a4886d215df4bd7306bd0c43865b1833f","abstract_canon_sha256":"228fcce5552bab9397fb24c705dbd9a5b86b2ca19b2aa9728d9f271690737d6a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274526Z","signature_b64":"CfgDSnPNxuk52Et/6Qflii7C8V+2IpQigKbX+Yu06vXrbvQ5VEJWWhUlZ46hgkZvhoBtfDOvoOWPHS9Q3X7tBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c8cff75a347325174603bf4d18cb314ec11fa68cbac0df204e2fcb41600dbcf5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274114Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274114Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Emilie Passemar, Stefan Schacht, Yuval Grossman","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T18:36:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We point out that testing the equality of the Cabibbo angle as extracted from $\\Gamma(K\\rightarrow \\pi l\\nu)$, the ratio $\\Gamma(K\\rightarrow l\\nu)/\\Gamma(\\pi\\rightarrow l\\nu)$ and nuclear $\\beta$ decays is not identical to a test of first row unitarity of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. The reason is that a CKM unitarity test involves only two parameters, while the degrees of freedom for the assessment of the goodness-of-fit of the universality of the Cabibbo angle entailed by the Standard Model (SM) is equal to the number of measurements minus one. Beyond the SM all different pro"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1911.07821","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1911.07821/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1911.07821","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1911.07821v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1911.07821","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZDH7OWRUOMSR","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZDH7OWRU","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27878","citing_title":"Prospects for probing neutral vector-like leptons via pair production at muon collider","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.22383","citing_title":"Complete one-loop QED corrections to $D_s^+$ leptonic decays and impact on the CKM unitarity test","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDH7OWRU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDH7OWRU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1911.07821&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDH7OWRUOMSRORQDX5GRRSZRJ3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:44.274172+00:00"}