{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF","short_pith_number":"pith:ZECWXA6V","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c9056b83d5f0f3f017e93fea722e593143465e23a3a6ea8b5fee74c5906e0394","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2003.10551","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"G-Net: A Deep Learning Approach to G-computation for Counterfactual Outcome Prediction Under Dynamic Treatment Regimes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daby Sow, Jun Li, Li-wei H. Lehman, Mingyu Lu, Mohamed Ghalwash, Prithwish Chakraborty, Rui Li, Zach Shahn","submitted_at":"2020-03-23T21:08:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterfactual prediction is a fundamental task in decision-making. G-computation is a method for estimating expected counterfactual outcomes under dynamic time-varying treatment strategies. Existing G-computation implementations have mostly employed classical regression models with limited capacity to capture complex temporal and nonlinear dependence structures. This paper introduces G-Net, a novel sequential deep learning framework for G-computation that can handle complex time series data while imposing minimal modeling assumptions and provide estimates of individual or population-level tim"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2003.10551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-03-23T21:08:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"c5ee843bfdcb317d5a3e37708e46fbb97e426eaf2ced7496d3504f5902bc47d7","abstract_canon_sha256":"d503ccd13fd4260811357db54b549983486bfebe5aaf0d5e746132d089d5f419"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392666Z","signature_b64":"a6HF7PrAMeVZwq6B6ChzUvTPhk5vxCfBbfUzdA4kMbkEjOLFtooSga0HOhk5uZInN7/JRObKrbNNXOu3O0cwAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c9056b83d5f0f3f017e93fea722e593143465e23a3a6ea8b5fee74c5906e0394","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392272Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392272Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"G-Net: A Deep Learning Approach to G-computation for Counterfactual Outcome Prediction Under Dynamic Treatment Regimes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daby Sow, Jun Li, Li-wei H. Lehman, Mingyu Lu, Mohamed Ghalwash, Prithwish Chakraborty, Rui Li, Zach Shahn","submitted_at":"2020-03-23T21:08:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterfactual prediction is a fundamental task in decision-making. G-computation is a method for estimating expected counterfactual outcomes under dynamic time-varying treatment strategies. Existing G-computation implementations have mostly employed classical regression models with limited capacity to capture complex temporal and nonlinear dependence structures. This paper introduces G-Net, a novel sequential deep learning framework for G-computation that can handle complex time series data while imposing minimal modeling assumptions and provide estimates of individual or population-level tim"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2003.10551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2003.10551/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2003.10551","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2003.10551v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2003.10551","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZECWXA6V6DZ7","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7J","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZECWXA6V","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.21722","citing_title":"Inferring Effects of Major Events through Discontinuity Forecasting of Population Anxiety","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZECWXA6V"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZECWXA6V","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2003.10551&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZECWXA6V6DZ7AF7JH7VHELSZGF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:50:18.392336+00:00"}