{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2","short_pith_number":"pith:ZFH5C5XN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c94fd176edcba3e374dd39b6be3912869116995d18678dfadcda42f5aaaf6011","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.16872","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"AI agents cause harm but lack any persistent body to receive consequences and change behavior, so high-stakes use must stay tethered to human principals.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Botao Amber Hu, Helena Rong","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T08:24:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI agents increasingly act consequentially in the real world. This creates a problem we call \\emph{consequence reception}: harm occurs, the producing system is identified, yet no continuing agent receives consequences in a way that changes future behavior. Pain, understood mechanistically as a corrective feedback signal, is foundational to canonical theories of punishment -- deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, and incapacitation all assume a continuing locus that registers the signal and updates behavior. That, in turn, requires a body for the signal to land on: a boundary whose integrity"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.16872","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T08:24:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"69dc3e7b713be614f523949b3f67252bcce59d2167039100088a9ee4f91f1ffb","abstract_canon_sha256":"e3413f87b5f98e768b9479ffe9e61bde4ffe220833528c4c547001a84442c182"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.497337Z","signature_b64":"Fbij5QxPhC8BD8Gn3qcICO8TvcboA0XJ8I7b2SPFgFJh//cIwnyWHO6kmbWQ3Qn6Iw9moDeHfG7jjUroJNwBCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c94fd176edcba3e374dd39b6be3912869116995d18678dfadcda42f5aaaf6011","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496479Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496479Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"AI agents cause harm but lack any persistent body to receive consequences and change behavior, so high-stakes use must stay tethered to human principals.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Botao Amber Hu, Helena Rong","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T08:24:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI agents increasingly act consequentially in the real world. This creates a problem we call \\emph{consequence reception}: harm occurs, the producing system is identified, yet no continuing agent receives consequences in a way that changes future behavior. Pain, understood mechanistically as a corrective feedback signal, is foundational to canonical theories of punishment -- deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, and incapacitation all assume a continuing locus that registers the signal and updates behavior. That, in turn, requires a body for the signal to land on: a boundary whose integrity"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Achieving consequence-agency coupling is therefore a sociotechnical infrastructural problem, not only a legal one. Until such architectures exist, high-stakes AI deployment should remain tethered to accountable human principals with meaningful control, proportional liability, and authority to constrain or terminate the agent.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that pain, understood mechanistically as a corrective feedback signal, is foundational to canonical theories of punishment and requires a continuing locus (body) for effective consequence reception in AI agents.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"AI agents lack the persistent identity and feedback mechanisms needed for consequence reception, requiring new architectures or continued human accountability.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"AI agents cause harm but lack any persistent body to receive consequences and change behavior, so high-stakes use must stay tethered to human principals.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"e98f1bd31d9b6029b9eef972541bd33f684f3b6449559df7f68b3f1695e3b97d"},"source":{"id":"2605.16872","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"a17cc122-2c87-462c-8f02-d9da143a20fe","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T19:42:06.127127Z","strongest_claim":"Achieving consequence-agency coupling is therefore a sociotechnical infrastructural problem, not only a legal one. Until such architectures exist, high-stakes AI deployment should remain tethered to accountable human principals with meaningful control, proportional liability, and authority to constrain or terminate the agent.","one_line_summary":"AI agents lack the persistent identity and feedback mechanisms needed for consequence reception, requiring new architectures or continued human accountability.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that pain, understood mechanistically as a corrective feedback signal, is foundational to canonical theories of punishment and requires a continuing locus (body) for effective consequence reception in AI agents.","pith_extraction_headline":"AI agents cause harm but lack any persistent body to receive consequences and change behavior, so high-stakes use must stay tethered to human principals."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16872/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:01:18.974980Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:50:42.528341Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:41:56.297228Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.373747Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"e9e5c7b0f6dd2a74d68a45948898841338791b72e1dcc7195a2f54db0eabe642"},"references":{"count":107,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law , volume=","work_id":"f9bc21a9-de72-48b4-a10e-e8ad422f36df","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2018,"title":"2019 , month = nov, url =","work_id":"131e7f3e-a352-40e2-aba6-ade66ea0987e","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2019,"title":"UC Davis Law Review , volume=","work_id":"7978f856-4403-419f-a782-6aabc049e31b","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2018,"title":"Nature Human Behaviour , volume=","work_id":"34bce5e3-019d-43b4-85b8-e83915ebcc6f","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2004,"title":"Psychological Science , volume=","work_id":"5d4fb7ad-ff2a-49cf-b637-540b40ff2318","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":107,"snapshot_sha256":"9f795d902000014497131741fe485bfb56926dcf03ca148aee8acceb9d8809d2","internal_anchors":8},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"8a18972975fa2d80a2dd786558f349108bea0d23ced92d7515e9e5ea7a8a4580"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16872","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16872v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16872","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZFH5C5XNZOR6","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZFH5C5XN","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZFH5C5XN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZFH5C5XN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.16872&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZFH5C5XNZOR6G5G5HG3L4OISQ2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:27.496624+00:00"}