{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y","short_pith_number":"pith:ZIW4V3WL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ca2dcaeecba3b50d66989016298054ee0ab4117fd1772e549c60155752609f57","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2106.01208","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Rafael C. Nunes, Sunny Vagnozzi","submitted_at":"2021-06-02T14:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Within the $\\Lambda$CDM model, measurements from recent Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and weak lensing (WL) surveys have uncovered a $\\sim 3\\sigma$ disagreement in the inferred value of the parameter $S_8 \\equiv \\sigma_8\\sqrt{\\Omega_m/0.3}$, quantifying the amplitude of late-time matter fluctuations. Before questioning whether the $S_8$ discrepancy calls for new physics, it is important to assess the view of measurements other than CMB and WL ones on the discrepancy. Here, we examine the role of measurements of the growth rate $f(z)$ in arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy, considering measur"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2106.01208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2021-06-02T14:52:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"415dba37c4bd2ac8f7e09d60e24f9be45937b1cd0794da2236be6f088f888dcb","abstract_canon_sha256":"7a772dd8fdee0436134148da2698499a840b31532e0f27927e70a6eaebacd7e1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386807Z","signature_b64":"F4UD3+2taFbpZ49qbf96q/gke+lYVFtnCdVgLfyPVbF17yd2Cx6+dGjIEqThjohOL73JYe1QHIr9vnh5RVNEDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ca2dcaeecba3b50d66989016298054ee0ab4117fd1772e549c60155752609f57","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386364Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386364Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Rafael C. Nunes, Sunny Vagnozzi","submitted_at":"2021-06-02T14:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Within the $\\Lambda$CDM model, measurements from recent Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and weak lensing (WL) surveys have uncovered a $\\sim 3\\sigma$ disagreement in the inferred value of the parameter $S_8 \\equiv \\sigma_8\\sqrt{\\Omega_m/0.3}$, quantifying the amplitude of late-time matter fluctuations. Before questioning whether the $S_8$ discrepancy calls for new physics, it is important to assess the view of measurements other than CMB and WL ones on the discrepancy. Here, we examine the role of measurements of the growth rate $f(z)$ in arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy, considering measur"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2106.01208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2106.01208/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2106.01208","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2106.01208v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2106.01208","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZIW4V3WLUO2Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUY","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZIW4V3WL","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12822","citing_title":"Geometric obstruction to resolving the Hubble tension: orthogonality of scale and shape in distance measurements","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22309","citing_title":"Signatures of Modified Gravity on Linear Scales in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background","ref_index":89,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18741","citing_title":"Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum from relativistic $N$-body Simulations: $\\Lambda_{\\rm s}$CDM versus $\\Lambda$CDM","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.02077","citing_title":"Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity","ref_index":117,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11093","citing_title":"New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZIW4V3WL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZIW4V3WL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2106.01208&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZIW4V3WLUO2Q2ZUYSALCTACU5Y/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:54:31.386420+00:00"}