{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I","short_pith_number":"pith:ZJI4SAUU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ca51c902946f8c863c471ebc062f1dda21804bdf3dd431703f189463c1ffe88f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.06379","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Axioms for physical reasoning: codifying the Seiberg--Witten solution in Lean","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Michael R. Douglas","submitted_at":"2026-07-07T15:18:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mathematicians have embraced interactive theorem provers with growing enthusiasm -- building large shared libraries and machine-checking a string of landmark results. Theoretical physics is different: most of its results are not theorems but justified by arguments the community trusts without a rigorous proof. For many -- the one we treat here among them -- no rigorous proof is within reach. For 4d Yang--Mills theory, deriving exact rigorous results from first principles would first require constructing the interacting theory nonperturbatively, which is a sizable piece of one of the Clay Mille"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.06379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2026-07-07T15:18:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"bfe48b3fc1bd27b79857dc62cccbc497ac05917be2e734f2475d2f7c0ec22019","abstract_canon_sha256":"16f86433bb5a5e1b6d726d6a81b92ed0006645d67c7b3d12a0f20f709fcc8c1e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.745230Z","signature_b64":"O5WpyLw+nSb10csj/tQCMSER9Gq9E8QRlpBG98L9IUAPLhH+3ipT99yhzNl7lWsXTmqBMNbn3f9EJE3zioGKCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ca51c902946f8c863c471ebc062f1dda21804bdf3dd431703f189463c1ffe88f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744801Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744801Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Axioms for physical reasoning: codifying the Seiberg--Witten solution in Lean","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Michael R. Douglas","submitted_at":"2026-07-07T15:18:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mathematicians have embraced interactive theorem provers with growing enthusiasm -- building large shared libraries and machine-checking a string of landmark results. Theoretical physics is different: most of its results are not theorems but justified by arguments the community trusts without a rigorous proof. For many -- the one we treat here among them -- no rigorous proof is within reach. For 4d Yang--Mills theory, deriving exact rigorous results from first principles would first require constructing the interacting theory nonperturbatively, which is a sizable piece of one of the Clay Mille"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.06379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.06379/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.06379","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.06379v1","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.06379","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZJI4SAUUN6GI","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCH","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZJI4SAUU","created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.11792","citing_title":"Algebraic versus physical uniqueness of MHV gravity numerators","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZJI4SAUU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZJI4SAUU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.06379&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZJI4SAUUN6GIMPCHD26AMLY53I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-08T01:19:23.744868+00:00"}