{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY","short_pith_number":"pith:ZK4J22C5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cab89d685d74f92941685dc19a0ec69e0580b42ebf68ae65cb43aade4b6ef106","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.15963","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evaluating Data Influence in Meta Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chenyang Ren, Di Wang, Huanyi Xie, Lijie Hu, Meng Ding, Shu Yang","submitted_at":"2025-01-27T11:14:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"As one of the most fundamental models, meta learning aims to effectively address few-shot learning challenges. However, it still faces significant issues related to the training data, such as training inefficiencies due to numerous low-contribution tasks in large datasets and substantial noise from incorrect labels. Thus, training data attribution methods are needed for meta learning. However, the dual-layer structure of mata learning complicates the modeling of training data contributions because of the interdependent influence between meta-parameters and task-specific parameters, making exis"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.15963","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-01-27T11:14:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"title_canon_sha256":"5883d71b3c5dcc2c079348243231cc09fd407cd652a0cc913690db64ca88affe","abstract_canon_sha256":"a18c5bcf8b0973f6d15fe7e00525339a1b8328ee9c93911fcc54cea95c988416"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842874Z","signature_b64":"yMhvoXjCdCWavxDVZXMeLFZLSCZGQkrPxLxAml3P/RKW2XZpNy3E9XL29z3aCOreBU5iH0QsVZthd8uTKOUNCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cab89d685d74f92941685dc19a0ec69e0580b42ebf68ae65cb43aade4b6ef106","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842359Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842359Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evaluating Data Influence in Meta Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chenyang Ren, Di Wang, Huanyi Xie, Lijie Hu, Meng Ding, Shu Yang","submitted_at":"2025-01-27T11:14:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"As one of the most fundamental models, meta learning aims to effectively address few-shot learning challenges. However, it still faces significant issues related to the training data, such as training inefficiencies due to numerous low-contribution tasks in large datasets and substantial noise from incorrect labels. Thus, training data attribution methods are needed for meta learning. However, the dual-layer structure of mata learning complicates the modeling of training data contributions because of the interdependent influence between meta-parameters and task-specific parameters, making exis"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.15963","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.15963/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.15963","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.15963v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.15963","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZK4J22C5OT4S","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZK4J22C5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12944","citing_title":"From Instance Selection to Fixed-Pool Data Recipe Search for Supervised Fine-Tuning","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZK4J22C5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZK4J22C5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.15963&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZK4J22C5OT4SSQLILXAZUDWGTY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:52.842417+00:00"}