{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX","short_pith_number":"pith:ZKHQAJNS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ca8f0025b2023671449936635ce02d25df34d39c69f2ed0fa91bf3a9aaef2e25","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2109.01962","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Counterfactual Evaluation for Explainable AI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fei Sun, Juntao Tan, Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Shuyuan Xu, Yingqiang Ge, Yongfeng Zhang, Yunqi Li, Zelong Li","submitted_at":"2021-09-05T01:38:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"While recent years have witnessed the emergence of various explainable methods in machine learning, to what degree the explanations really represent the reasoning process behind the model prediction -- namely, the faithfulness of explanation -- is still an open problem. One commonly used way to measure faithfulness is \\textit{erasure-based} criteria. Though conceptually simple, erasure-based criterion could inevitably introduce biases and artifacts. We propose a new methodology to evaluate the faithfulness of explanations from the \\textit{counterfactual reasoning} perspective: the model should"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2109.01962","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-09-05T01:38:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"be1fd6fca24063273cfa69ef8370bf2806b1668221e65c095582f0b9e92f15cd","abstract_canon_sha256":"5a3d8345791c5d4c06a933a2b8df01a5b987354d238fa14441740689d6a9913d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867579Z","signature_b64":"+/Vj7om2Wu51gazAGOlCeLGiI7v4w7ArRwND0tTaAr9fnAolLzy6YCWefzv/nepqVxv9uwkiRleZ7TR+WIHUCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ca8f0025b2023671449936635ce02d25df34d39c69f2ed0fa91bf3a9aaef2e25","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867217Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867217Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Counterfactual Evaluation for Explainable AI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fei Sun, Juntao Tan, Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Shuyuan Xu, Yingqiang Ge, Yongfeng Zhang, Yunqi Li, Zelong Li","submitted_at":"2021-09-05T01:38:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"While recent years have witnessed the emergence of various explainable methods in machine learning, to what degree the explanations really represent the reasoning process behind the model prediction -- namely, the faithfulness of explanation -- is still an open problem. One commonly used way to measure faithfulness is \\textit{erasure-based} criteria. Though conceptually simple, erasure-based criterion could inevitably introduce biases and artifacts. We propose a new methodology to evaluate the faithfulness of explanations from the \\textit{counterfactual reasoning} perspective: the model should"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2109.01962","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2109.01962/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2109.01962","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2109.01962v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2109.01962","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZKHQAJNSAI3H","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZKHQAJNS","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2407.11089","citing_title":"Explainable bank failure prediction models: Counterfactual explanations to reduce the failure risk","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKHQAJNS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKHQAJNS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2109.01962&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKHQAJNSAI3HCREZGZRVZYBNEX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:36.867273+00:00"}