{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE","short_pith_number":"pith:ZKI47I5C","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ca91cfa3a2994677f662f08da7c65e0930f8e959af425c374d26c03853ad7932","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2303.14226","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","econ.EM","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Abhineet Agarwal, Anish Agarwal, Suhas Vijaykumar","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T18:45:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consider a setting where there are $N$ heterogeneous units and $p$ interventions. Our goal is to learn unit-specific potential outcomes for any combination of these $p$ interventions, i.e., $N \\times 2^p$ causal parameters. Choosing a combination of interventions is a problem that naturally arises in a variety of applications such as factorial design experiments, recommendation engines, combination therapies in medicine, conjoint analysis, etc. Running $N \\times 2^p$ experiments to estimate the various parameters is likely expensive and/or infeasible as $N$ and $p$ grow. Further, with observat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2303.14226","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T18:45:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","econ.EM","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"fb1c7dd682d1a9087c723fc65a069cea1d0dddcf7ad86b4fd744780462dd789b","abstract_canon_sha256":"6ac03895650c2b4ac042f38254e43c11c87a4e397d5623afa7b6567d8b3b42e7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.010116Z","signature_b64":"7rKHXUF9PMZPtizJEGvfNoE5DcAkmAd/9LMZYAiV10uQiPk+bbNUiJYli+jVZxzswqN6IMPa6RFiLhnNm46kDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ca91cfa3a2994677f662f08da7c65e0930f8e959af425c374d26c03853ad7932","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009593Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009593Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","econ.EM","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Abhineet Agarwal, Anish Agarwal, Suhas Vijaykumar","submitted_at":"2023-03-24T18:45:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consider a setting where there are $N$ heterogeneous units and $p$ interventions. Our goal is to learn unit-specific potential outcomes for any combination of these $p$ interventions, i.e., $N \\times 2^p$ causal parameters. Choosing a combination of interventions is a problem that naturally arises in a variety of applications such as factorial design experiments, recommendation engines, combination therapies in medicine, conjoint analysis, etc. Running $N \\times 2^p$ experiments to estimate the various parameters is likely expensive and/or infeasible as $N$ and $p$ grow. Further, with observat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2303.14226","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2303.14226/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2303.14226","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2303.14226v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.14226","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZKI47I5CTFDH","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZKI47I5C","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07399","citing_title":"Automatic, Debiased, and Invariant Counterfactual Generation under General Interventions","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKI47I5C"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKI47I5C","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2303.14226&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKI47I5CTFDHP5TC6CG2PRS6BE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:33:12.009652+00:00"}