{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU","short_pith_number":"pith:ZKNZURFJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ca9b9a44a9062c522b5973436e2d8035338c3b172154088d43c15138bcf8a969","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.07548","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"DeVAIC: A Tool for Security Assessment of AI-generated Code","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Domenico Cotroneo, Pietro Liguori, Roberta De Luca","submitted_at":"2024-04-11T08:27:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: AI code generators are revolutionizing code writing and software development, but their training on large datasets, including potentially untrusted source code, raises security concerns. Furthermore, these generators can produce incomplete code snippets that are challenging to evaluate using current solutions.\n  Objective: This research work introduces DeVAIC (Detection of Vulnerabilities in AI-generated Code), a tool to evaluate the security of AI-generated Python code, which overcomes the challenge of examining incomplete code.\n  Method: We followed a methodological approach that in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.07548","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-04-11T08:27:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ea76da8ee97426e973bc561669096158a42a3c7cf0683a9f53fa43162f0545f1","abstract_canon_sha256":"d432351865b2c11319c752f0ab446689e1964fdf65cb9bec35ac72949c49d3d4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387487Z","signature_b64":"1hyMLQWjg8KVxZa8vv/8wQaFLgWC8FqZ5/9iGb0f25fN/9ymjuLreAZ1oTqtMgDZBqT5y6dNHGWE6Mv5GfLEDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ca9b9a44a9062c522b5973436e2d8035338c3b172154088d43c15138bcf8a969","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387049Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387049Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"DeVAIC: A Tool for Security Assessment of AI-generated Code","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Domenico Cotroneo, Pietro Liguori, Roberta De Luca","submitted_at":"2024-04-11T08:27:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: AI code generators are revolutionizing code writing and software development, but their training on large datasets, including potentially untrusted source code, raises security concerns. Furthermore, these generators can produce incomplete code snippets that are challenging to evaluate using current solutions.\n  Objective: This research work introduces DeVAIC (Detection of Vulnerabilities in AI-generated Code), a tool to evaluate the security of AI-generated Python code, which overcomes the challenge of examining incomplete code.\n  Method: We followed a methodological approach that in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.07548","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.07548/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.07548","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.07548v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.07548","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZKNZURFJAYWF","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZKNZURFJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05267","citing_title":"Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKNZURFJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZKNZURFJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.07548&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZKNZURFJAYWFEK2ZONBW4LMAGU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:32.387104+00:00"}