{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO","short_pith_number":"pith:ZNQWSQ5M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cb616943ac41a0a886bdabca6b7741b38f45dc6247962c6483530c7bc8380741","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2207.07051","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning tasks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew K. Lampinen, Antonia Creswell, Dharshan Kumaran, Felix Hill, Hannah R. Sheahan, Ishita Dasgupta, James L. McClelland, Stephanie C. Y. Chan","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T16:51:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning is a key ability for an intelligent system. Large language models (LMs) achieve above-chance performance on abstract reasoning tasks, but exhibit many imperfections. However, human abstract reasoning is also imperfect. For example, human reasoning is affected by our real-world knowledge and beliefs, and shows notable \"content effects\"; humans reason more reliably when the semantic content of a problem supports the correct logical inferences. These content-entangled reasoning patterns play a central role in debates about the fundamental nature of human intelligence. Here, we investiga"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2207.07051","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T16:51:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"e342189e2912bf9f606c2c46e7d8183078e6130aa7954133e2575fe837857762","abstract_canon_sha256":"840091ada27f66483f0f9a5b9559ce35ad47f6b35bee2f0f7f19a11208bb1752"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.875128Z","signature_b64":"a2ObRC0B0L52oUqTpqm/yYYJ0ZOoxK5hufwFAUt4AxWILwbHj+qkfCxweNcbEHhjdbx1gNEbVVpblCc6rni+Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cb616943ac41a0a886bdabca6b7741b38f45dc6247962c6483530c7bc8380741","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874700Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874700Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning tasks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew K. Lampinen, Antonia Creswell, Dharshan Kumaran, Felix Hill, Hannah R. Sheahan, Ishita Dasgupta, James L. McClelland, Stephanie C. Y. Chan","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T16:51:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning is a key ability for an intelligent system. Large language models (LMs) achieve above-chance performance on abstract reasoning tasks, but exhibit many imperfections. However, human abstract reasoning is also imperfect. For example, human reasoning is affected by our real-world knowledge and beliefs, and shows notable \"content effects\"; humans reason more reliably when the semantic content of a problem supports the correct logical inferences. These content-entangled reasoning patterns play a central role in debates about the fundamental nature of human intelligence. Here, we investiga"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2207.07051","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2207.07051/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2207.07051","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2207.07051v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2207.07051","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZNQWSQ5MIGQK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZNQWSQ5M","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":9,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09157","citing_title":"SEF-CLGC at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Logical Notation Impact on Language Model Performance","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.28405","citing_title":"Measuring Progress Toward AGI: A Cognitive Framework","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30323","citing_title":"In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.20761","citing_title":"Integrating Large Language Model Agents with Digital Twins for Industrial Autonomous Systems","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22972","citing_title":"A mathematical theory of balancing relational generalization and memorization","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.03295","citing_title":"Language Model Goal Selection Differs from Humans' in a Self-Directed Learning Task","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.02676","citing_title":"ITLC at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Normalization and Deterministic Parsing for Formal Reasoning in LLMs","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22038","citing_title":"Source-Modality Monitoring in Vision-Language Models","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18328","citing_title":"FregeLogic at SemEval 2026 Task 11: A Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Content-Robust Syllogistic Validity Prediction","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZNQWSQ5M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZNQWSQ5M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2207.07051&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZNQWSQ5MIGQKRBV5VPFGW52BWO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:45:19.874746+00:00"}