{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM","short_pith_number":"pith:ZRWTAWXD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cc6d305ae3aec231ef8b9ae64c69e61b21e5d8d63d41c3e12fed113f163639d9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2010.05465","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Najoung Kim, Tal Linzen","submitted_at":"2020-10-12T05:45:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Natural language is characterized by compositionality: the meaning of a complex expression is constructed from the meanings of its constituent parts. To facilitate the evaluation of the compositional abilities of language processing architectures, we introduce COGS, a semantic parsing dataset based on a fragment of English. The evaluation portion of COGS contains multiple systematic gaps that can only be addressed by compositional generalization; these include new combinations of familiar syntactic structures, or new combinations of familiar words and familiar structures. In experiments with T"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2010.05465","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-10-12T05:45:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6be68b710b021659271da168082a02947582c2486db3b478e0c7ffd9b5754a83","abstract_canon_sha256":"b1c9ba542b0c25ed111b2863e95c09ba61ac892e0744526f653595316b545f1c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823977Z","signature_b64":"9Kkmegd0MOExI6cwh0yDW1MU/KPG1nzPynvPqZAKONVtKvuiRwcteQCo4dtICq8ciBdw8Pt4yMFk9T9LP5NOAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cc6d305ae3aec231ef8b9ae64c69e61b21e5d8d63d41c3e12fed113f163639d9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823567Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823567Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Najoung Kim, Tal Linzen","submitted_at":"2020-10-12T05:45:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Natural language is characterized by compositionality: the meaning of a complex expression is constructed from the meanings of its constituent parts. To facilitate the evaluation of the compositional abilities of language processing architectures, we introduce COGS, a semantic parsing dataset based on a fragment of English. The evaluation portion of COGS contains multiple systematic gaps that can only be addressed by compositional generalization; these include new combinations of familiar syntactic structures, or new combinations of familiar words and familiar structures. In experiments with T"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2010.05465","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2010.05465/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2010.05465","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2010.05465v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2010.05465","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZRWTAWXDV3BD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34L","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZRWTAWXD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.01685","citing_title":"How Do Language Models Compose Functions?","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25166","citing_title":"Training Transformers as a Universal Computer","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03413","citing_title":"Learning to Theorize the World from Observation","ref_index":295,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15306","citing_title":"Generalization in LLM Problem Solving: The Case of the Shortest Path","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZRWTAWXD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZRWTAWXD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2010.05465&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZRWTAWXDV3BDD34LTLTEY2PGDM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:42:06.823629+00:00"}