{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM","short_pith_number":"pith:ZSWJIDSB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ccac940e417d73b50240ba0e9281edbb0e77bd0df55b61e521f3c0adf914730c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1910.00972","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Chris Akers, Daniel Harlow, Netta Engelhardt","submitted_at":"2019-10-02T14:20:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Several recent papers have shown a close relationship between entanglement wedge reconstruction and the unitarity of black hole evaporation in AdS/CFT. The analysis of these papers however has a rather puzzling feature: all calculations are done using bulk dynamics which are essentially those Hawking used to predict information loss, but applying ideas from entanglement wedge reconstruction seems to suggest a Page curve which is consistent with information conservation. Why should two different calculations in the same model give different answers for the Page curve?\n  In this note we present "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1910.00972","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2019-10-02T14:20:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"4725107d827299274e2030f63b00bad93755ecfbf2b42efa54cb9ea75fe23771","abstract_canon_sha256":"0d1df07ce6c6adaee47e63203d118debb9d35f97c94cdb71e080c94c6c48aa59"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725921Z","signature_b64":"wA6VyxhqC6LFan6UTUikQzDf49ScXiuDE/5Nyouz1doI2NDAKkfWwPiKS1qbPYIRkKlCGmXj5VG4XClniHWvBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ccac940e417d73b50240ba0e9281edbb0e77bd0df55b61e521f3c0adf914730c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725338Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725338Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Chris Akers, Daniel Harlow, Netta Engelhardt","submitted_at":"2019-10-02T14:20:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Several recent papers have shown a close relationship between entanglement wedge reconstruction and the unitarity of black hole evaporation in AdS/CFT. The analysis of these papers however has a rather puzzling feature: all calculations are done using bulk dynamics which are essentially those Hawking used to predict information loss, but applying ideas from entanglement wedge reconstruction seems to suggest a Page curve which is consistent with information conservation. Why should two different calculations in the same model give different answers for the Page curve?\n  In this note we present "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1910.00972","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1910.00972/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1910.00972","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1910.00972v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1910.00972","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZSWJIDSBPVZ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASA","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZSWJIDSB","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1911.12333","citing_title":"Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1911.11977","citing_title":"Replica wormholes and the black hole interior","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZSWJIDSB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZSWJIDSB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1910.00972&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZSWJIDSBPVZ3KASAXIHJFAPNXM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:29:41.725401+00:00"}