{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB","short_pith_number":"pith:ZVNQWX3R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cd5b0b5f71fb1919e5e57994912e4c584ea6e9985ef981cc2997b68f446240fa","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2212.01326","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fangyi Yu, Frank Schilder, Lee Quartey","submitted_at":"2022-12-02T17:41:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models that are capable of zero or few-shot prompting approaches have given rise to the new research area of prompt engineering. Recent advances showed that for example Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts can improve arithmetic or common sense tasks significantly. We explore how such approaches fare with legal reasoning tasks and take the COLIEE entailment task based on the Japanese Bar exam for testing zero-shot/few-shot and fine-tuning approaches. Our findings show that while CoT prompting and fine-tuning with explanations approaches show improvements, the best results are produced"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2212.01326","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-12-02T17:41:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"5b0d660903c6d4aea615ceca3fbd12ee73a2850d8a80393ea0de463e95be3e44","abstract_canon_sha256":"1eb97c7175035afea63703ed6c36eac49389fc1464bf74554bc179b2cf9c45df"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.958155Z","signature_b64":"JhL8Tpz4rrZamqgG6/gy4Cnd2PqtWV1pxHUTpOw2ggnRkWRBykYVAaB+1jVeLWww8oy0rC2UlOa/kSQl4+0kBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cd5b0b5f71fb1919e5e57994912e4c584ea6e9985ef981cc2997b68f446240fa","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957711Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957711Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fangyi Yu, Frank Schilder, Lee Quartey","submitted_at":"2022-12-02T17:41:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models that are capable of zero or few-shot prompting approaches have given rise to the new research area of prompt engineering. Recent advances showed that for example Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts can improve arithmetic or common sense tasks significantly. We explore how such approaches fare with legal reasoning tasks and take the COLIEE entailment task based on the Japanese Bar exam for testing zero-shot/few-shot and fine-tuning approaches. Our findings show that while CoT prompting and fine-tuning with explanations approaches show improvements, the best results are produced"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2212.01326","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2212.01326/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2212.01326","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2212.01326v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2212.01326","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZVNQWX3R7MMR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPF","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZVNQWX3R","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30205","citing_title":"LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2401.03568","citing_title":"Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interaction","ref_index":235,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZVNQWX3R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZVNQWX3R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2212.01326&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVNQWX3R7MMRTZPFPGKJCLSMLB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:23:47.957772+00:00"}