{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW","short_pith_number":"pith:ZVYK76QB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cd70affa018418d6a893ba2cc8239c3dbefe97c419dc59853396369d8b5e2ca7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.02205","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Dehai Zhao, Liming Zhu, Md Shamsujjoha, Qinghua Lu","submitted_at":"2024-08-05T03:08:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Foundation Model (FM)-based agents are revolutionizing application development across various domains. However, their rapidly growing capabilities and autonomy have raised significant concerns about AI safety. Researchers are exploring better ways to design guardrails to ensure that the runtime behavior of FM-based agents remains within specific boundaries. Nevertheless, designing effective runtime guardrails is challenging due to the agents' autonomous and non-deterministic behavior. The involvement of multiple pipeline stages and agent artifacts, such as goals, plans, tools, at runtime furth"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.02205","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-08-05T03:08:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d562f79ffc6ed9b58ad61fda60e95266af0b14353e17feae252f29cf3e4b14f1","abstract_canon_sha256":"75ed47eac44c64552032f0499b05bf0366210236acf1469ff9a5fec67ea453d6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216525Z","signature_b64":"n32DnaKJCbHYopkVHRy1L1Dw7q2ptH0SHCF+2ZmAv6umHkwaWSk/bpk3mdnYH/0WcvwhGoMaasKK6Pf5eG0FCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cd70affa018418d6a893ba2cc8239c3dbefe97c419dc59853396369d8b5e2ca7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216095Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216095Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Dehai Zhao, Liming Zhu, Md Shamsujjoha, Qinghua Lu","submitted_at":"2024-08-05T03:08:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Foundation Model (FM)-based agents are revolutionizing application development across various domains. However, their rapidly growing capabilities and autonomy have raised significant concerns about AI safety. Researchers are exploring better ways to design guardrails to ensure that the runtime behavior of FM-based agents remains within specific boundaries. Nevertheless, designing effective runtime guardrails is challenging due to the agents' autonomous and non-deterministic behavior. The involvement of multiple pipeline stages and agent artifacts, such as goals, plans, tools, at runtime furth"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.02205","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.02205/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.02205","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.02205v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.02205","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZVYK76QBQQMN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZVYK76QBQQMNNKET","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZVYK76QB","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24245","citing_title":"AutoSpec: Safety Rule Evolution for LLM Agents via Inductive Logic Programming","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08059","citing_title":"Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08059","citing_title":"Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZVYK76QB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZVYK76QB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.02205&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZVYK76QBQQMNNKETXIWMQI44HW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:12.216155+00:00"}