{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y","short_pith_number":"pith:ZW7THPZD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cdbf33bf23b1b3136967611ba9e64bfe1094058574dc5e6e55b8812d009e65c4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.12644","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hierarchical Prompting Taxonomy: A Universal Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models Aligned with Human Cognitive Principles","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aman Chadha, Ashutosh Kumar, Devichand Budagam, Mahsa Khoshnoodi, Sankalp KJ, Vinija Jain","submitted_at":"2024-06-18T14:12:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Assessing the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in performing different tasks is crucial for understanding their strengths and weaknesses. This paper presents Hierarchical Prompting Taxonomy (HPT), grounded on human cognitive principles and designed to assess LLMs by examining the cognitive demands of various tasks. The HPT utilizes the Hierarchical Prompting Framework (HPF), which structures five unique prompting strategies in a hierarchical order based on their cognitive requirement on LLMs when compared to human mental capabilities. It assesses the complexity of tasks with the H"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.12644","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-18T14:12:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"bc4999cc3ccfdffbb7ca2baec27c76600da0d50ee6e2d4e8eecaaceab524236e","abstract_canon_sha256":"02558c538c4dd13aa3071865ab6615de19a78c7404c8a2cad05158ab354b4dfd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237792Z","signature_b64":"6HKasFKV3Bgxsn7EleS2PZ4AVe1C75eQSA8f5A2Ku/Qex21Q2Y/PvGubBRxG8Sqmmg/nQv68K6E2XoACr6MzAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cdbf33bf23b1b3136967611ba9e64bfe1094058574dc5e6e55b8812d009e65c4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237242Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237242Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hierarchical Prompting Taxonomy: A Universal Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models Aligned with Human Cognitive Principles","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aman Chadha, Ashutosh Kumar, Devichand Budagam, Mahsa Khoshnoodi, Sankalp KJ, Vinija Jain","submitted_at":"2024-06-18T14:12:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Assessing the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in performing different tasks is crucial for understanding their strengths and weaknesses. This paper presents Hierarchical Prompting Taxonomy (HPT), grounded on human cognitive principles and designed to assess LLMs by examining the cognitive demands of various tasks. The HPT utilizes the Hierarchical Prompting Framework (HPF), which structures five unique prompting strategies in a hierarchical order based on their cognitive requirement on LLMs when compared to human mental capabilities. It assesses the complexity of tasks with the H"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.12644","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.12644/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.12644","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.12644v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.12644","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZW7THPZDWGZR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZW7THPZD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11470","citing_title":"The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZW7THPZD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZW7THPZD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.12644&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZW7THPZDWGZRG2LHMEN2TZSL7Y/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:39:41.237306+00:00"}