{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT","short_pith_number":"pith:ZXPVG6P4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"cddf5379fcb4ccb0516e42ece9fad46cd67e07d32727a1860a1ccc8c8439573b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.14825","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fanxu Meng, Jiaqi Li, Muhan Zhang, Song-Chun Zhu, Xiaojuan Tang, Yitao Liang, Zilong Zheng","submitted_at":"2023-05-24T07:33:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergent few-shot reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have excited the natural language and machine learning community over recent years. Despite of numerous successful applications, the underlying mechanism of such in-context capabilities still remains unclear. In this work, we hypothesize that the learned \\textit{semantics} of language tokens do the most heavy lifting during the reasoning process. Different from human's symbolic reasoning process, the semantic representations of LLMs could create strong connections among tokens, thus composing a superficial logical cha"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.14825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-05-24T07:33:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"49c208daa84a5a6512422efa84a480445ded2a0ef700114925ffdaa7c2b29315","abstract_canon_sha256":"6dc1430d6058306c6acbae7588ef1d4dabd8ef950df0e9c1c69802b986808d72"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769709Z","signature_b64":"UDD+bfH1KKwEm2ZIOWbOjBHlnr7HKaMJufJ+fDAc7LVinBwS290V+HF+UAiwL5lYMzgQX7+zWgIzaM6+DclMAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"cddf5379fcb4ccb0516e42ece9fad46cd67e07d32727a1860a1ccc8c8439573b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769295Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769295Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fanxu Meng, Jiaqi Li, Muhan Zhang, Song-Chun Zhu, Xiaojuan Tang, Yitao Liang, Zilong Zheng","submitted_at":"2023-05-24T07:33:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergent few-shot reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have excited the natural language and machine learning community over recent years. Despite of numerous successful applications, the underlying mechanism of such in-context capabilities still remains unclear. In this work, we hypothesize that the learned \\textit{semantics} of language tokens do the most heavy lifting during the reasoning process. Different from human's symbolic reasoning process, the semantic representations of LLMs could create strong connections among tokens, thus composing a superficial logical cha"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.14825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.14825/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.14825","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.14825v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.14825","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZXPVG6P4WTGL","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZXPVG6P4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26795","citing_title":"What Does Chain-of-Thought Contribute at Probe Time? Evidence for Local Co-Occurrence Activation","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21260","citing_title":"On the Cost and Benefit of Chain of Thought: A Learning-Theoretic Perspective","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.01191","citing_title":"Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08621","citing_title":"EvidenT: An Evidence-Preserving Framework for Iterative System-Level Package Repair","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19016","citing_title":"AlignCultura: Towards Culturally Aligned Large Language Models?","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZXPVG6P4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZXPVG6P4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.14825&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZXPVG6P4WTGLAULOILWOT6WUNT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:52.769362+00:00"}