{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1995:ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD","short_pith_number":"pith:ZYVM67LY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ce2acf7d7872d8541a16bc6767f974c0e53dadb129b1d393dfc85bb2b1389d54","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-ph/9512328","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Three-jet cross sections to next-to-leading order","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Signer, S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt","submitted_at":"1995-12-16T13:40:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"One- and two-jet inclusive quantities in hadron collisions have already been calculated to next-to-leading order accuracy, using both the subtraction and the cone method. Since the one-loop corrections have recently been obtained for all five-parton amplitudes, three-jet inclusive quantities can also be predicted to next-to-leading order. The subtraction method presented in the literature is based on a systematic use of boost-invariant kinematical variables, and therefore its application to three-jet production is quite cumbersome. In this paper we re-analyze the subtraction method and point o"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9512328","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"1995-12-16T13:40:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ff5be166df1d2d14fb90e51924dd88157127abea1aeb2be4b9fc7a0000cb8d7c","abstract_canon_sha256":"02c14053d5c75905616dbf84d5b725549ebe1a2ae8bb3e9c6e5f5eb697927b4d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366759Z","signature_b64":"bNFPzH7ROIqepwV1VOiMp4dlFHqy08ru3KO8Q0Re+Ver8KYUF4fzoXdCidVZU3y7yAl9N0vUR4xJ/Rf3tR+2AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ce2acf7d7872d8541a16bc6767f974c0e53dadb129b1d393dfc85bb2b1389d54","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366331Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366331Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Three-jet cross sections to next-to-leading order","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Signer, S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt","submitted_at":"1995-12-16T13:40:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"One- and two-jet inclusive quantities in hadron collisions have already been calculated to next-to-leading order accuracy, using both the subtraction and the cone method. Since the one-loop corrections have recently been obtained for all five-parton amplitudes, three-jet inclusive quantities can also be predicted to next-to-leading order. The subtraction method presented in the literature is based on a systematic use of boost-invariant kinematical variables, and therefore its application to three-jet production is quite cumbersome. In this paper we re-analyze the subtraction method and point o"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9512328","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-ph/9512328/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-ph/9512328","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-ph/9512328v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9512328","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZYVM67LYOLMF","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQW","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZYVM67LY","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":14,"internal_anchor_count":11,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08723","citing_title":"Optimal-Transport-Based Cell Resampling for Negative and Pathological Event Weights","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06059","citing_title":"A resonance-aware MC@NLO QCD+EW-matched calculation of lepton-pair production","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22007","citing_title":"Monte Carlo Event Generators for Future Lepton Colliders","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21510","citing_title":"Heavy-quark pair-production in DIS at NLO QCD matched to a parton shower","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18176","citing_title":"Perturbative QCD as a quantitative tool in the years 1976-2000","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11083","citing_title":"Matrix element method at NLO: A fine proof of concept in POWHEG","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.31221","citing_title":"CoLoRFulNNLO for color-singlet processes: An update on NNLOCAL","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.06689","citing_title":"Les Houches 2023 -- Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist","ref_index":170,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.03724","citing_title":"Stay Positive: Neural Refinement of Sample Weights","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.10420","citing_title":"On the reconstruction of kinematic distributions computed with Monte Carlo methods using orthogonal basis functions","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.04959","citing_title":"Towards a Fully Automated Differential $\\text{NNLO}_\\text{EW}$ Generator for Lepton Colliders","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1002.2581","citing_title":"A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1405.0301","citing_title":"The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"0709.2092","citing_title":"Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZYVM67LY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZYVM67LY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-ph/9512328&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZYVM67LYOLMFIGQWXRTWP6LUYD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:59:18.366399+00:00"}