pith. sign in

arxiv: 1507.05950 · v1 · pith:QFXHUMZJnew · submitted 2015-07-21 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.CC· cs.DS· cs.LG

On the Worst-Case Approximability of Sparse PCA

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.CCcs.DScs.LG
keywords sparseapproximationconstantleftrightvarepsilonworst-caseachieves
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It is well known that Sparse PCA (Sparse Principal Component Analysis) is NP-hard to solve exactly on worst-case instances. What is the complexity of solving Sparse PCA approximately? Our contributions include: 1) a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves an $n^{-1/3}$-approximation; 2) NP-hardness of approximation to within $(1-\varepsilon)$, for some small constant $\varepsilon > 0$; 3) SSE-hardness of approximation to within any constant factor; and 4) an $\exp\exp\left(\Omega\left(\sqrt{\log \log n}\right)\right)$ ("quasi-quasi-polynomial") gap for the standard semidefinite program.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Randomized Algorithm for Sparse PCA based on the Basic SDP Relaxation

    stat.ML 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A randomized algorithm based on the basic SDP relaxation for sparse PCA achieves an approximation ratio bounded by the sparsity constant with high probability and O(log d) on average under a technical assumption satis...