Using Argument-based Features to Predict and Analyse Review Helpfulness
read the original abstract
We study the helpful product reviews identification problem in this paper. We observe that the evidence-conclusion discourse relations, also known as arguments, often appear in product reviews, and we hypothesise that some argument-based features, e.g. the percentage of argumentative sentences, the evidences-conclusions ratios, are good indicators of helpful reviews. To validate this hypothesis, we manually annotate arguments in 110 hotel reviews, and investigate the effectiveness of several combinations of argument-based features. Experiments suggest that, when being used together with the argument-based features, the state-of-the-art baseline features can enjoy a performance boost (in terms of F1) of 11.01\% in average.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Gradient-Boosted Decision Tree for Listwise Context Model in Multimodal Review Helpfulness Prediction
Introduces listwise attention, listwise loss, and GBDT predictor to improve multimodal review helpfulness ranking over prior FCNN and pairwise approaches.
-
Adaptive Contrastive Learning on Multimodal Transformer for Review Helpfulness Predictions
Multimodal contrastive learning with adaptive weighting and interaction module achieves state-of-the-art results on two MRHP benchmark datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.