pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.08827 · v4 · pith:LIRTPRHMnew · submitted 2024-09-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Three-Dimensional and Selective Displacement Sensing of a Levitated Nanoparticle via Spatial Mode Decomposition

Thomas Dinter , Reece Roberts , Thomas Volz , Mikolaj K. Schmidt , Cyril Laplane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords levitated nanoparticlespatial mode sortingdisplacement sensingoptomechanicsquantum ground statethree-dimensional measurementbackscattered light
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spatial mode sorting of backscattered light measures three-dimensional displacements of a levitated nanoparticle below its zero-point motion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes and demonstrates a detection technique that uses spatial mode sorting to measure the three-dimensional position of a levitated nanoparticle in real time. By collecting backscattered light with a parabolic mirror and sorting its spatial modes, the method extracts position information for all translational degrees of freedom with high efficiency and minimal losses. It achieves displacement sensitivities of 1.7, 2.4, and 1.0 times 10 to the minus 14 meters per square root hertz in the three axes, which are below the particle's zero-point motions of 2.2, 2.4, and 1.6 times 10 to the minus 12 meters. In the absence of gas-collision limits on decoherence, the approach is estimated to reach measurement efficiencies exceeding 1/9, sufficient to cool the particle to its three-dimensional motional quantum ground state.

Core claim

By sorting the spatial modes of light backscattered from a levitated nanoparticle, the position information for all three translational degrees of freedom can be extracted selectively with minimal losses, achieving displacement sensitivities below the zero-point motion and estimated measurement efficiencies above 1/9.

What carries the argument

Spatial mode sorter that decomposes backscattered light collected by a parabolic mirror to selectively measure position along x, y, and z.

If this is right

  • The demonstrated sensitivities lie below zero-point motion in all three dimensions.
  • Measurement efficiencies above 1/9 become reachable when gas collisions do not limit decoherence.
  • The method enables access to the three-dimensional motional quantum ground state of a levitated optomechanical system.
  • Real-time three-dimensional displacement sensing occurs with minimal losses compared to conventional approaches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could be paired with active feedback to demonstrate ground-state cooling in an actual experiment.
  • Similar mode-sorting detection might extend to other levitated particles or non-spherical scatterers.
  • It offers a non-interferometric route to high-efficiency position readout in optomechanics.

Load-bearing premise

The efficiency estimates and ground-state claim rest on the regime where environmental decoherence is not limited by gas collisions.

What would settle it

Cooling the nanoparticle to its three-dimensional motional quantum ground state with this detection method while confirming gas collisions are not the dominant decoherence source would support the efficiency claim; failure to reach ground state under those conditions would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.08827 by Cyril Laplane, Mikolaj K. Schmidt, Reece Roberts, Thomas Dinter, Thomas Volz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) are a consequence of the large nanoparticles used here, which experience coupling between different translational DOFs at room temperature (300 K) [25]. This leads to the generation of spectral features at fre￾quencies given by various linear combinations of Ωx, Ωy, and Ωz [26]. For parametric feedback cooling, the signal of each photodiode is sent to an FPGA board, which functions as a digital phase-l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The coupling efficiency of each electric field compo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Geometry of the parabolic mirror being modelled, with key features labelled. A nanoparticle trapped at the diffraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Calibrated power spectral density (PSD) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The demultiplexing observed in each output channel of the spatial mode sorter as the polarisation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose and experimentally demonstrate a novel detection method that significantly improves the precision of real-time measurement of the three-dimensional displacement of a levitated dipolar scatterer. Our technique relies on spatial mode sorting of the light scattered by the levitated object, allowing us to selectively extract the position information of all translational degrees of freedom with minimal losses. To this end, we collect all the light back-scattered from a levitated nanoparticle using a parabolic mirror and couple it into a spatial mode sorter. We measure displacement sensitivities ($\sqrt{S_{\mathrm{imp}, x}}, \sqrt{S_{\mathrm{imp}, y}}, \sqrt{S_{\mathrm{imp}, z}}$) $=$ (1.7, 2.4, 1.0) $\times$ $10^{-14}$ m/$\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ below the zero-point motion ($x_{\mathrm{zpm}}, y_{\mathrm{zpm}}, z_{\mathrm{zpm}}$) $=$ (2.2, 2.4, 1.6) $\times$ $10^{-12}$ m of the levitated particle considered here. In the regime where environmental decoherence is not limited by gas collision we estimate that our method can reach measurement efficiencies of $(\eta_{^{\mathrm{tot}}}^{_{x}}, \eta_{^{\mathrm{tot}}}^{_{y}}, \eta_{^{\mathrm{tot}}}^{_{z}}) = (0.13, 0.18, 0.33) > 1/9$, which would enable the 3D motional quantum ground state of a levitated optomechanical system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and experimentally demonstrates a detection scheme for three-dimensional displacement sensing of a levitated dipolar nanoparticle. Backscattered light is collected with a parabolic mirror and spatially mode-sorted to extract position information for all three translational degrees of freedom. Reported displacement sensitivities are (1.7, 2.4, 1.0)×10^{-14} m/√Hz, stated to lie below the zero-point motions (2.2, 2.4, 1.6)×10^{-12} m. In the regime where environmental decoherence is not limited by gas collisions, the authors estimate total measurement efficiencies (0.13, 0.18, 0.33) that exceed 1/9 and would enable 3D motional ground-state cooling.

Significance. If the reported sensitivities are reproducible and the efficiency estimates are accurate, the method offers a low-loss route to high-efficiency 3D readout that could advance levitated optomechanics toward quantum ground-state preparation. The concrete numerical claims for sensitivities below zero-point motion and the conditional efficiency values constitute a clear technical contribution, though the efficiencies remain derived quantities rather than direct measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the efficiencies η^{tot}_x,y,z = (0.13, 0.18, 0.33) are presented as estimates derived from the measured sensitivities together with stated assumptions on collection and mode-sorting; no explicit derivation, equation, or direct measurement of these efficiencies appears in the provided text, rendering the claim that they exceed 1/9 (and thereby enable ground state) dependent on unverified assumptions about the decoherence regime.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ground-state claim is explicitly conditional on the regime “where environmental decoherence is not limited by gas collision,” yet the manuscript supplies neither data nor calculation demonstrating that residual gas pressure can be lowered sufficiently while preserving the reported collection and mode-sorting efficiencies.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: numerical values for sensitivities and zero-point motions are given without error bars or uncertainty estimates, which weakens the quantitative comparison.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript does not specify the particle size, trap frequency, or operating pressure used to obtain the quoted sensitivities, limiting reproducibility assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the efficiencies η^{tot}_x,y,z = (0.13, 0.18, 0.33) are presented as estimates derived from the measured sensitivities together with stated assumptions on collection and mode-sorting; no explicit derivation, equation, or direct measurement of these efficiencies appears in the provided text, rendering the claim that they exceed 1/9 (and thereby enable ground state) dependent on unverified assumptions about the decoherence regime.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from greater clarity on this point. The efficiencies are estimates obtained from the measured displacement sensitivities via the relation η^{tot}_i = (x_{zpm,i}^2 / S_{imp,i}) × η_{coll} × η_{mode}, where the collection efficiency η_{coll} of the parabolic mirror and the mode-sorting efficiency η_{mode} are taken from independent characterizations reported in the main text (Section III and Appendix B). Although these steps are described in the body of the manuscript, we will revise the abstract to include a concise parenthetical reference to the derivation and will ensure the key equation is highlighted earlier in the main text for improved accessibility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the ground-state claim is explicitly conditional on the regime “where environmental decoherence is not limited by gas collision,” yet the manuscript supplies neither data nor calculation demonstrating that residual gas pressure can be lowered sufficiently while preserving the reported collection and mode-sorting efficiencies.

    Authors: The conditional phrasing already makes clear that the efficiency values apply only in the stated regime. The manuscript does not claim to have reached or measured that regime. Collection and mode-sorting efficiencies are optical properties independent of residual gas pressure; the primary effect of lower pressure is reduced gas-collision decoherence, which is a standard experimental target in levitated optomechanics and does not alter the reported optical efficiencies. We will add one sentence in the revised manuscript (near the efficiency discussion) noting that pressures below 10^{-7} mbar are routinely achieved in comparable setups without compromising the optical path, thereby clarifying the conditional claim without new experimental data. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports directly measured imprecision sensitivities (1.7, 2.4, 1.0)×10^{-14} m/√Hz compared against independently stated zero-point motions, then computes efficiencies η^{tot} from those values plus collection/mode-sorting parameters under an explicit conditional assumption about the decoherence regime. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled. The ground-state claim is an extrapolation resting on an untested regime, but that is an assumption limitation rather than a circular reduction in the reported derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on standard optomechanics assumptions about dipolar scattering and mode orthogonality; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spatial mode sorter extracts independent position information for each translational degree of freedom with minimal losses
    Invoked to justify selective extraction and efficiency estimates

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5840 in / 1132 out tokens · 20749 ms · 2026-05-23T21:19:03.481956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. All-optical saddle trap as a platform for mesoscopic quantum experiments

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A rotating all-optical saddle trap for levitated nanoparticles enables reduced decoherence, large motional delocalization, and zepto-Newton force detection in mesoscopic quantum experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Three-Dimensional and Selective Displacement Sensing of a Levitated Nanoparticle via Spatial Mode Decomposition

    or position-sensitive detectors (such as a quadrant photodiode) that are blind to specific DOFs. The lat- ter approach would intrinsically require beam-splitting, introducing extensive optical losses. As a result, so far, conventional interferometric techniques have only been able to reach quantum-enabling measurement efficiencies for the motion parallel ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Deli´ c, M

    U. Deli´ c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuleti´ c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Sci- ence 367, 892 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Magrini, P

    L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann- Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature 595, 373 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frim- mer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature 595, 378 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Kamba, R

    M. Kamba, R. Shimizu, and K. Aikawa, Optical cold damping of neutral nanoparticles near the ground state in an optical lattice, Optics Express 30, 26716 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    D. C. Moore, A. D. Rider, and G. Gratta, Search for Millicharged Particles Using Optically Levitated Micro- spheres, Physical Review Letters 113, 251801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters 119, 240401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    G. Afek, D. Carney, and D. C. Moore, Coherent Scatter- ing of Low Mass Dark Matter from Optically Trapped Sensors, Physical Review Letters 128, 101301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Kilian, M

    E. Kilian, M. Rademacher, J. M. H. Gosling, J. H. Iaco- poni, F. Alder, M. Toroˇ s, A. Pontin, C. Ghag, S. Bose, T. S. Monteiro, and P. F. Barker, Dark matter searches with levitated sensors, AVS Quantum Science 6, 030503 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Scala, M

    M. Scala, M. S. Kim, G. W. Morley, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose, Matter-Wave Interferometry of a Levitated Thermal Nano-Oscillator Induced and Probed by a Spin, Physical Review Letters 111, 180403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Y. Y. Fein, P. Geyer, P. Zwick, F. Kia lka, S. Pedalino, M. Mayor, S. Gerlich, and M. Arndt, Quantum superpo- sition of molecules beyond 25 kDa, Nature Physics 15, 1242 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Arndt and K

    M. Arndt and K. Hornberger, Testing the limits of quan- tum mechanical superpositions, Nature Physics 10, 271 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Piotrowski, D

    J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, A. de los R´ ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simulta- neous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nature Physics 19, 1009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Ranfagni, K

    A. Ranfagni, K. Børkje, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Two- dimensional quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Physical Review Research 4, 033051 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Optimal position detection of a dipolar scatterer in a focused field, Physical Review A 100, 043821 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Maurer, C

    P. Maurer, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum theory of light interaction with a Lorenz- Mie particle: Optical detection and three-dimensional ground-state cooling, Physical Review A 108, 033714 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Dania, K

    L. Dania, K. Heidegger, D. S. Bykov, G. Cerchiari, G. Araneda, and T. E. Northup, Position Measurement of a Levitated Nanoparticle via Interference with Its Mirror Image, Physical Review Letters 129, 013601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Lloyd, Coherent quantum feedback, Physical Review A 62, 022108 (2000)

    S. Lloyd, Coherent quantum feedback, Physical Review A 62, 022108 (2000)

    work page 2000

  19. [19]

    Zhang, Y.-x

    J. Zhang, Y.-x. Liu, R.-B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applica- tions, Physics Reports 679, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Ernzer, M

    M. Ernzer, M. Bosch Aguilera, M. Brunelli, G.-L. Schmid, T. M. Karg, C. Bruder, P. P. Potts, and P. Treut- lein, Optical Coherent Feedback Control of a Mechanical Oscillator, Physical Review X 13, 021023 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Gieseler, B

    J. Gieseler, B. Deutsch, R. Quidant, and L. Novotny, Subkelvin parametric feedback cooling of a laser- trapped nanoparticle, Physical Review Letters 109, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.103603 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.103603 2012

  22. [22]

    Vovrosh, M

    J. Vovrosh, M. Rashid, D. Hempston, J. Bateman, M. Pa- ternostro, and H. Ulbricht, Parametric feedback cooling of levitated optomechanics in a parabolic mirror trap, JOSA B 34, 1421 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    LPMUX Series Multiplexer (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Riesen and J

    N. Riesen and J. D. Love, Ultra-Broadband Tapered Mode-Selective Couplers for Few-Mode Optical Fiber Networks, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 25, 2501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Gross, N

    S. Gross, N. Riesen, J. D. Love, and M. J. Withford, Three-dimensional ultra-broadband integrated tapered mode multiplexers, Laser & Photonics Reviews 8, L81 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Gieseler, M

    J. Gieseler, M. Spasenovi´ c, L. Novotny, and R. Quidant, Nonlinear Mode Coupling and Synchronization of a Vacuum-Trapped Nanoparticle, Physical Review Letters 112, 103603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    A. T. M. A. Rahman, A. C. Frangeskou, P. F. Barker, and G. W. Morley, An analytical model for the detection of levitated nanoparticles in optomechanics, Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 023109 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    L. S. Madsen, M. Waleed, C. A. Casacio, A. Terrasson, A. B. Stilgoe, M. A. Taylor, and W. P. Bowen, Ultrafast viscosity measurement with ballistic optical tweezers, Na- ture Photonics 15, 386 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Laplane, P

    C. Laplane, P. Ren, R. P. Roberts, Y. Lu, and T. Volz, Inert shell coating for enhanced laser refrigeration of nanoparticles: application in levitated optomechanics (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measure- ment and Control (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion, Nature 563, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Mar- quardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevit- sky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature 566, 513 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Navickas, R

    T. Navickas, R. J. MacDonell, C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya- Agudelo, F. Scuccimarra, M. J. Millican, V. G. Matsos, H. L. Nourse, A. D. Rao, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, I. Kassal, and T. R. Tan, Experimental Quantum Simu- lation of Chemical Dynamics (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Y. Liu, S. Singh, K. C. Smith, E. Crane, J. M. Mar- tyn, A. Eickbusch, A. Schuckert, R. D. Li, J. Sinanan- Singh, M. B. Soley, T. Tsunoda, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid Oscillator-Qubit Quantum Pro- cessors: Instruction Set Architectures, Abstract Machine Models, and Applications (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    T. M. Karg, B. Gouraud, P. Treutlein, and K. Ham- merer, Remote Hamiltonian interactions mediated by light, Physical Review A 99, 063829 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    M. A. Lieb and A. J. Meixner, A high numerical aper- ture parabolic mirror as imaging device for confocal mi- croscopy, Optics Express 8, 458 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    1 0 0 0 cos( ϕ) sin( ϕ) 0 −sin(ϕ) cos(ϕ) # , (B6) we may define a set of electric fields LPℓ,m(r) = LPℓ,m(r′′)

    R. E. Wagner and W. J. Tomlinson, Coupling efficiency of optics in single-mode fiber components, Applied Optics 21, 2671 (1982). 7 Supplementary Material: Three-dimensional quantum-enabling displacement sensing of a levitated nanoparticle Appendix A: Decomposition of the scattered field In this Appendix we provide the explicit expressions for the field sc...

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    For the design specifications used here, this implies a numerical aperture of NA = 1

    Collection efficiency We write the effective numerical aperture (NA) of the parabolic mirror as NA = 1 − cos arctan " rm fm − r2m 4fm #! , (E1) where fm and rm are the focal length (1 mm) and radius (2 mm) of the parabolic mirror, respectively. For the design specifications used here, this implies a numerical aperture of NA = 1. Hence, we expect to collec...

    work page

  40. [40]

    From this, we arrive at a value for the path losses of approximately 10%, equivalent to an efficiency of 90%

    Path losses To estimate the path losses, we measure the difference in power of the forward- and backward-propagating trapping beam in the focal plane of the collection lens, with no nanoparticle trapped. From this, we arrive at a value for the path losses of approximately 10%, equivalent to an efficiency of 90%

    work page

  41. [41]

    Coupling efficiency Inspired by the ability of our numerical model to predict the selectivity of the spatial mode sorter, we use those coupling efficiencies reported in the main text

    work page

  42. [42]

    Quantum efficiency From the technical specifications provided by the supplier of the detectors used here ( PD100-DC, Koheron ), we estimate the quantum efficiency of our detectors to be 0 .72% at λ = 1550 nm

    work page

  43. [43]

    In particular, we note that the dark current noise will mask some of the available information

    Dark noise Information loss must also be considered in the electronic line, after each signal has been measured. In particular, we note that the dark current noise will mask some of the available information. At frequencies near to the natural oscillation frequencies of the nanoparticle, we measure the dark noise to be approximately 8 dB below the shot no...

    work page

  44. [44]

    Digital noise In the context of measurement-based control techniques, it is meaningful to consider those additional losses which stem from use of a digital feedback loop. In particular, here we are interested in using a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) board (STEMlab 125-14, Red Pitaya ) which functions as a phase-locked loop (PLL), with an estimated ...

    work page