pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.19754 · v4 · pith:HQJ6MOV3new · submitted 2024-12-27 · 💰 econ.GN · cs.AI· q-fin.EC

Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills

classification 💰 econ.GN cs.AIq-fin.EC
keywords skillsrolesdemandhumancomplementaryeffectsfindingsincreases
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the nature of work, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how it affects demand for human skills. This paper examines whether AI adoption increases the prevalence and value of human capabilities that complement technical AI skills, such as analytical thinking, resilience, or ethical judgment, within and beyond AI-intensive job roles. Using a dataset of nearly 30 million job postings from the US, the UK and Australia, between 2018 and 2024, we distinguish between internal effects (within AI roles) and external effects (in non-AI roles) across companies, industries, and regions. This paper has three main findings. First, we find that AI-intensive roles are significantly more likely to require complementary non-technical capabilities, such as analytical thinking, resilience, and digital literacy. Second, these complementary skills are associated with meaningful wage premiums, particularly in managerial, sales or finance roles working with AI. Third, we show that AI diffusion has potential spillover effects: as AI adoption rises within companies, industries, and regions, demand for complementary skills increases even in non-AI roles while demand for substitutable skills - summarisation, translation or customer service - decreases. These trends hold across geographies, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, confirming the robustness of our findings. Together, these findings indicate that AI is not simply replacing tasks or requiring more AI developer skills; it may be transforming workforce skill requirements to favor human attributes that enhance collaboration with intelligent systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Productivity-Reliability Paradox: Specification-Driven Governance for AI-Augmented Software Development

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The Productivity-Reliability Paradox arises because AI code generators produce variable output while developers lack sufficient specification discipline, making governance models focused on specifications the binding ...

  2. Generative-AI and the transformation of workforce. A job postings-driven analysis

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Job postings data shows a sharp post-2021 rise in generative AI competencies such as prompt engineering and model validation, a drop in routine skills, and forecasts of continued growth in AI and soft skills through 2025.