pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.02276 · v1 · submitted 2025-01-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.bio-ph

Entropic organization of topologically modified ring polymers in spherical confinement

Kingkini Roychoudhury , Shreerang Pande , Indrakanty S. Shashank , Debarshi Mitra , Apratim Chatterji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph
keywords ring polymersspherical confinementtopological modificationentropy-driven organizationexcluded volumepolymer loopschromosome organization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymmetric loop topology in ring polymers reverses radial organization in a sphere when chains are crowded.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a ring polymer modified to contain one small loop and one large loop organizes its segments inside a sphere through entropy alone. With only one such polymer present, monomers of the larger loop are statistically more likely to lie near the confining surface. When multiple modified polymers share the sphere, the preference inverts and small-loop monomers move closer to the wall. The localization strengthens when each polymer carries additional small loops. The authors map how loops contact one another both inside a single chain and across different chains, and they note possible relevance to chromosome packing inside a spherical nucleus.

Core claim

For a single topologically modified ring polymer confined in a sphere the monomers of the larger loop are more probable near the periphery, yet the situation reverses with multiple such polymers so that small-loop monomers localize closer to the wall; both patterns arise purely from entropy maximization under repulsive excluded-volume interactions in the bead-spring model.

What carries the argument

The asymmetrically looped ring polymer (one small loop plus one large loop) whose entropic interactions with the spherical boundary and with other chains produce the observed radial segregation.

If this is right

  • Increasing the number of small loops per polymer strengthens radial localization of segments.
  • Contact maps reveal distinct intra-polymer and inter-polymer loop interaction patterns.
  • The reversal occurs only under crowding and therefore depends on the number of chains inside the sphere.
  • The same topological modification offers a candidate mechanism for spatial organization of confined polymers without energetic attractions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The crowding-induced reversal suggests that loop-based positioning could be tuned by polymer concentration in other confining geometries.
  • Extending the model to loops of continuously varying size would test whether the reversal threshold depends on the loop-length ratio.
  • The contact-map analysis implies that loop-loop avoidance may create effective territories even in the absence of specific binding.
  • If similar topology exists in real chromosomes, nuclear crowding could drive small-loop segments toward the nuclear envelope.

Load-bearing premise

The only forces between monomers are repulsive excluded-volume interactions, so all observed organization is driven by entropy.

What would settle it

A simulation or experiment in which the radial preferences fail to reverse when the number of polymers is increased, or in which the preferences vanish once attractive interactions are added, would falsify the purely entropic mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02276 by Apratim Chatterji, Debarshi Mitra, Indrakanty S. Shashank, Kingkini Roychoudhury, Shreerang Pande.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In this figure, we show schematics of different topologically modified ring polymers. In schematic (a), a ring polymer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: This set of subfigures shows the difference in organization between the two different segments of a Ring-polymer and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: This figure shows the organization of the small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This figure shows the distribution of the CoM’s of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: This figure shows the normalized monomer densities of small and big loops of Arc-1-2 and Arc-1-3 polymers for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This figure shows the probability distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: This figure shows the variation caused in the prefer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Subfigure(a) shows the normalized monomer densities of loops for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: This figure shows the normalized monomer densities of the small and big loops of different architectures in runs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The above figure shows the contact maps of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: In this figure, the subfigures (a), (b), (c), and (d) respectively show the contact maps of linear polymers, ring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: This figure shows normalized monomer density of the small loops and big loops when there are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The figure shows the Kinetic Energy, Potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It has been shown that under high cylindrical confinement, two ring polymers with excluded volume interactions between monomers, segregate to two halves of the cylinder to maximize their entropy. In contrast, two ring polymers remain mixed within a sphere, as there is no symmetry breaking direction [Nat Rev Microbiol, 8, 600-607 (2010)]. Therefore, in order to observe emergent organization of ring polymers in a sphere, we can introduce an asymmetric topological modification to the polymer architecture by creating a small loop and a big loop within the ring polymer. We consider the bead-spring model of polymers where there are only repulsive excluded volume interactions between the monomers ensuring that the organization we observe is purely entropy-driven. We find that for a single topologically modified polymer within a sphere, the monomers of the bigger loop are statistically more probable to be found closer to the periphery. However, the situation is reversed when we have multiple such topologically modified polymers in a sphere. The monomers of the small loops are found closer to the walls of the sphere. We can increase this localization and radial organization of polymer segments by increasing the number of small loops in each ring polymer. We study how these loops interact with each other within a polymer, as well as with loops of other polymers in spherical confinement. We compare contact maps of multiple such topologically modified polymers in a sphere. Finally, we discuss the plausible relevance of our studies to eukaryotic chromosomes that are confined within a spherical nucleus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses molecular-dynamics simulations of a bead-spring model with purely repulsive excluded-volume interactions to study ring polymers that each contain one small loop and one large loop, confined inside a sphere. For a single such polymer the monomers belonging to the larger loop are reported to be statistically more probable near the confining boundary; when multiple copies are present the preference reverses and small-loop monomers localize closer to the wall. The localization strengthens when the number of small loops per ring is increased. The authors also present contact maps comparing intra- and inter-polymer loop interactions and discuss possible relevance to chromosome organization inside the eukaryotic nucleus.

Significance. If the reported reversal proves robust under parameter variation, the work supplies a concrete, purely entropic mechanism by which topological asymmetry can produce radial segregation in confined polymers. This would be of interest to the soft-matter and biophysics communities studying chromosome territories, as the model isolates entropy without energetic attractions and employs a standard bead-spring representation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (multi-polymer)] Results section on multiple polymers: the reversal (small-loop monomers closer to the wall for N>1) is shown only for a single fixed set of values of small_loop_size, large_loop_size, number_of_polymers and sphere_radius. No additional runs at varied confinement strength or packing fraction are reported, leaving open whether the reversal is a general entropic consequence or specific to the simulated regime (see skeptic note).
  2. [Methods] Methods / Simulation details: quantitative information on total bead number, loop lengths in beads, number of independent trajectories, block-averaging procedure, and error estimation on the radial probability densities is not supplied, so the statistical reliability of the “statistically more probable” statements cannot be assessed from the text.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states simulation outcomes but supplies none of the numerical parameters (bead number, loop sizes, statistics) needed to evaluate the claims; these should be added or cross-referenced to the Methods section.
  2. [Results (contact maps)] Contact-map figures: it is unclear whether the maps are normalized by the number of possible contacts or by the number of frames; a brief statement on normalization would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive assessment of the potential interest to the soft-matter and biophysics communities. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (multi-polymer)] Results section on multiple polymers: the reversal (small-loop monomers closer to the wall for N>1) is shown only for a single fixed set of values of small_loop_size, large_loop_size, number_of_polymers and sphere_radius. No additional runs at varied confinement strength or packing fraction are reported, leaving open whether the reversal is a general entropic consequence or specific to the simulated regime (see skeptic note).

    Authors: We agree that the reversal is demonstrated only for one specific parameter combination and that additional runs would be needed to establish robustness across confinement strengths and packing fractions. The observed strengthening of localization upon increasing the number of small loops per ring already provides supporting evidence that the effect is tied to topological asymmetry rather than a narrow regime, but we will add simulations at varied packing fractions to the revised manuscript and include a brief discussion of the expected generality of the entropic mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods / Simulation details: quantitative information on total bead number, loop lengths in beads, number of independent trajectories, block-averaging procedure, and error estimation on the radial probability densities is not supplied, so the statistical reliability of the “statistically more probable” statements cannot be assessed from the text.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The revised manuscript will supply the missing quantitative details in the Methods section, including total bead number, loop lengths expressed in beads, number of independent trajectories, the block-averaging procedure, and the error estimation (standard error of the mean) applied to the radial probability densities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results obtained from direct molecular-dynamics simulations

full rationale

The manuscript reports observations from bead-spring MD simulations with repulsive excluded-volume interactions. No derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter, or uniqueness theorem is invoked whose output is then relabeled as a prediction. The central claims (radial preferences for single vs. multiple polymers) are direct statistical outputs of the trajectories; the entropic interpretation follows immediately from the model choice and does not loop back to any self-referential equation or self-citation. External citation to prior work on ring-polymer segregation is independent and does not bear the load of the new topological-modification results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of a purely repulsive bead-spring model and on several simulation control parameters whose values are not stated in the abstract. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • small_loop_size
    The number of monomers in the small loop is a model parameter chosen by the authors.
  • large_loop_size
    The number of monomers in the large loop is a model parameter chosen by the authors.
  • number_of_polymers
    The number of rings placed inside the sphere is a simulation parameter.
  • sphere_radius
    The radius of the confining sphere is a simulation parameter.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption bead-spring model with only repulsive excluded-volume interactions produces purely entropy-driven organization
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the justification for the observed organization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5815 in / 1405 out tokens · 39349 ms · 2026-05-23T06:35:11.141302+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Entropic alignment of topologically modified ring polymers in cylindrical confinement

    cond-mat.soft 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Asymmetric internal loops in ring polymers under cylindrical confinement produce effective entropic orientational ordering between neighbors, akin to Ising spins but driven purely by entropy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Topology-driven spatial organization of ring poly- mers under confinement

    Debarshi Mitra, Shreerang Pande, and Apratim Chat- terji. Topology-driven spatial organization of ring poly- mers under confinement. Phys. Rev. E , 106:054502, Nov 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results

    Cristian Micheletti, Davide Marenduzzo, and Enzo Or- landini. Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results. Physics Reports, 504(1):1–73, July 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Polovnikov, Hugo B

    Kirill E. Polovnikov, Hugo B. Brand˜ ao, Sergey Belan, Bogdan Slavov, Maxim Imakaev, and Leonid A. Mirny. Crumpled polymer with loops recapitulates key features of chromosome organization. Physical Review X , 13, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Sougata Guha and Mithun K. Mitra. Multivalent binding proteins can drive collapse and reswelling of chromatin in confinement. Soft Matter, 19:153–163, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Haddad, D

    N. Haddad, D. Jost, and C. Vaillant. Perspectives: using polymer modeling to understand the formation and func- tion of nuclear compartments. Chromosome Research, 25(1):35–50, January 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Alexander, Agnese Bar- bensi, Dorothy Buck, Julyan H.E

    Luca Tubiana, Gareth P. Alexander, Agnese Bar- bensi, Dorothy Buck, Julyan H.E. Cartwright, Ma- teusz Chwastyk, Marek Cieplak, Ivan Coluzza, Simon ˇCopar, David J. Craik, Marco Di Stefano, Ralf Ever- aers, Patr´ ıcia F.N. Fa´ ısca, Franco Ferrari, Achille Gi- acometti, Dimos Goundaroulis, Ellinor Haglund, Ya- Ming Hou, Nevena Ilieva, Sophie E. Jackson, Al...

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Cook and Davide Marenduzzo

    Peter R. Cook and Davide Marenduzzo. Entropic or- ganization of interphase chromosomes. Journal of Cell Biology, 186(6):825–834, September 2009. 16

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Ahmed, Subhankar Roy, Bud- dhapriya Chakrabarti, and Mithun K

    Ajoy Maji, Jahir A. Ahmed, Subhankar Roy, Bud- dhapriya Chakrabarti, and Mithun K. Mitra. A lamin- associated chromatin model for chromosome organiza- tion. Biophysical Journal, 118(12):3041–3050, June 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Models of chromosome structure

    Mario Nicodemi and Ana Pombo. Models of chromosome structure. Current Opinion in Cell Biology , 28:90–95, June 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Genome organiza- tion: experiments and modeling

    Nick Gilbert and Davide Marenduzzo. Genome organiza- tion: experiments and modeling. Chromosome Research, 25(1):1–4, February 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Turner, and Cristian Micheletti

    Davide Michieletto, Enzo Orlandini, Matthew S. Turner, and Cristian Micheletti. Separation of geometrical and topological entanglement in confined polymers driven out of equilibrium. ACS Macro Letters, 9(8):1081–1085, July 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Mitra, and Ranjith Padin- hateeri

    Sangram Kadam, Kiran Kumari, Vinoth Manivannan, Shuvadip Dutta, Mithun K. Mitra, and Ranjith Padin- hateeri. Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-graining. Nature Com- munications, 14(1), July 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Adarshkrishnan, Ranjith Padin- hateeri, and Mithun K

    Shuvadip Dutta, R. Adarshkrishnan, Ranjith Padin- hateeri, and Mithun K. Mitra. Protein search processes mediated by chromatin topology. December 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    4d nucleome modeling

    Marco Di Stefano, Jonas Paulsen, Daniel Jost, and Marc A Marti-Renom. 4d nucleome modeling. Cur- rent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 67:25–32, April 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Abdulla, Maxime M

    Amith Z. Abdulla, Maxime M. C. Tortora, C´ edric Vail- lant, and Daniel Jost. Topological constraints and finite- size effects in quantitative polymer models of chromatin organization. Macromolecules, 56(21):8697–8709, Octo- ber 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Spatial and temporal organization of chromatin at small and large scales

    Helmut Schiessel. Spatial and temporal organization of chromatin at small and large scales. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , 14(1):193–210, March 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Chromatin remodelers: a concise introduction for bio- physicists

    Sophie Klempahn, Helmut Schiessel, and Ralf Blossey. Chromatin remodelers: a concise introduction for bio- physicists. Biophysical Reviews , 16(3):357–363, June 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Requirements for dna- bridging proteins to act as topological barriers of the bac- terial genome

    Marc Joyeux and Ivan Junier. Requirements for dna- bridging proteins to act as topological barriers of the bac- terial genome. Biophysical Journal , 119(6):1215–1225, September 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Fluidification of entangled polymers by loop extrusion

    Filippo Conforto, Yair Gutierrez Fosado, and Davide Michieletto. Fluidification of entangled polymers by loop extrusion. Physical Review Research, 6(3), August 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Dixon, David U

    Jesse R. Dixon, David U. Gorkin, and Bing Ren. Chro- matin domains: The unit of chromosome organization. Molecular Cell, 62(5):668–680, June 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Topological tuning of dna mobility in entangled solutions of supercoiled plas- mids, 2021

    Jan Smrek, Jonathan Garamella, Rae Robertson- Anderson, and Davide Michieletto. Topological tuning of dna mobility in entangled solutions of supercoiled plas- mids, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Regan, De- jie Kong, Gregory B

    Yuecheng Zhou, Kai-Wen Hsiao, Kathryn E. Regan, De- jie Kong, Gregory B. McKenna, Rae M. Robertson- Anderson, and Charles M. Schroeder. Effect of molecular architecture on ring polymer dynamics in semidilute lin- ear polymer solutions. Nature Communications, 10(1), April 2019

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: a numeri- cal simulation study

    Thomas Vettorel, Alexander Y Grosberg, and Kurt Kre- mer. Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: a numeri- cal simulation study. Physical Biology, 6(2):025013, July 2009

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S. Grest, Alexander Y. Grosberg, and Kurt Kremer. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring poly- mers in a melt. i. statics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(20), May 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S. Grest, Alexander Y. Grosberg, and Kurt Kremer. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring poly- mers in a melt. ii. dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(20), May 2011

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Conformational statis- tics of randomly branching double-folded ring polymers

    Angelo Rosa and Ralf Everaers. Conformational statis- tics of randomly branching double-folded ring polymers. The European Physical Journal E , 42(1), January 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    feynman test

    Raoul D. Schram, Angelo Rosa, and Ralf Everaers. Local loop opening in untangled ring polymer melts: a detailed “feynman test” of models for the large scale structure. Soft Matter, 15(11):2418–2429, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Melts of nonconcatenated rings in spherical confinement

    Stanard Mebwe Pachong, Iurii Chubak, Kurt Kremer, and Jan Smrek. Melts of nonconcatenated rings in spherical confinement. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 153(6), August 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Understanding the dynamics of rings in the melt in terms of the an- nealed tree model

    Jan Smrek and Alexander Y Grosberg. Understanding the dynamics of rings in the melt in terms of the an- nealed tree model. Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter, 27(6):064117, January 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Mix- ing and segregation of ring polymers: spatial confinement and molecular crowding effects

    Jaeoh Shin, Andrey G Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler. Mix- ing and segregation of ring polymers: spatial confinement and molecular crowding effects. New Journal of Physics , 16(5):053047, May 2014

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler

    Jaeoh Shin, Andrey G. Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler. Poly- mer looping is controlled by macromolecular crowding, spatial confinement, and chain stiffness. ACS Macro Let- ters, 4(2):202–206, January 2015

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Impact of self-association on the architec- tural properties of bacterial nucleoid proteins

    Marc Joyeux. Impact of self-association on the architec- tural properties of bacterial nucleoid proteins. Biophysi- cal Journal, 120(2):370–378, January 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Organization of the bacterial nucleoid by dna-bridging proteins and globular crowders

    Marc Joyeux. Organization of the bacterial nucleoid by dna-bridging proteins and globular crowders. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, February 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Le, and Michael T

    Anjana Badrinarayanan, Tung B.K. Le, and Michael T. Laub. Bacterial chromosome organization and segrega- tion. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology , 31(1):171–199, November 2015

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Woldringh, Flemming G

    Conrad L. Woldringh, Flemming G. Hansen, Norbert O. E. Vischer, and Tove Atlung. Segregation of chromo- some arms in growing and non-growing escherichia coli cells. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, May 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Changes in cell diameter during the division cycle of escherichia coli

    F J Trueba and C L Woldringh. Changes in cell diameter during the division cycle of escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 142(3):869–878, 1980

    work page 1980

  37. [37]

    Woldringh and Nanne Nanninga

    Conrad L. Woldringh and Nanne Nanninga. Structural and physical aspects of bacterial chromosome segrega- tion. Journal of Structural Biology, 156(2):273–283, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Jun and B

    S. Jun and B. Mulder. Entropy-driven spatial organiza- tion of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacte- rial chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(33):12388–12393, August 2006

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation

    Suckjoon Jun and Andrew Wright. Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation. Nature Reviews Microbiol- ogy, 8(8):600–607, August 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Pelletier, K

    J. Pelletier, K. Halvorsen, B.-Y. Ha, R. Paparcone, S. J. Sandler, C. L. Woldringh, W. P. Wong, and S. Jun. Phys- ical manipulation of the escherichia coli chromosome re- veals its soft nature.Proceedings of the National Academy 17 of Sciences, 109(40):E2649–E2656, September 2012

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact

    Youngkyun Jung, Chanil Jeon, Juin Kim, Hawoong Jeong, Suckjoon Jun, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact. Soft Matter, 8:2095–2102, 2012

    work page 2095

  42. [42]

    Intrachain ordering and segregation of poly- mers under confinement

    Youngkyun Jung, Juin Kim, Suckjoon Jun, and Bae- Yeun Ha. Intrachain ordering and segregation of poly- mers under confinement. Macromolecules, 45(7):3256– 3262, March 2012

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Broedersz

    Janni Harju and Chase P. Broedersz. Physical models of bacterial chromosomes. Molecular Microbiology, April 2024

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Woldringh

    Conrad L. Woldringh. Compaction and segregation of dna in escherichia coli. Life, 14(6):660, May 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Polymer architecture orchestrates the segregation and spatial organization of replicating e

    Debarshi Mitra, Shreerang Pande, and Apratim Chat- terji. Polymer architecture orchestrates the segregation and spatial organization of replicating e. coli chromo- somes in slow growth. Soft Matter, 18:5615–5631, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Topology-mediated organization of escherichia coli chromosome in fast-growth conditions

    Shreerang Pande, Debarshi Mitra, and Apratim Chat- terji. Topology-mediated organization of escherichia coli chromosome in fast-growth conditions. Phys. Rev. E , 110:054401, Nov 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Confined space and effective interactions of multiple self-avoiding chains

    Suckjoon Jun, Axel Arnold, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Confined space and effective interactions of multiple self-avoiding chains. Physical Review Letters, 98(12), March 2007

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Spa- tial and topological organization of DNA chains induced by gene co-localization

    Ivan Junier, Olivier Martin, and Fran¸ cois K´ ep` es. Spa- tial and topological organization of DNA chains induced by gene co-localization. PLoS Computational Biology , 6(2):e1000678, February 2010

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Heermann

    Andreas Hofmann and Dieter W. Heermann. The role of loops on the order of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. FEBS Letters, 589(20PartA):2958–2965, April 2015

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Search- ing target sites on dna by proteins: Role of dna dy- namics under confinement

    Anupam Mondal and Arnab Bhattacherjee. Search- ing target sites on dna by proteins: Role of dna dy- namics under confinement. Nucleic Acids Research , 43(19):9176–9186, September 2015

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Origin of spatial organization of DNA-polymer in bacterial chromosomes. EPL (Euro- physics Letters), 121(1):18004, January 2018

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Bacterial chromosome organization. i. crucial role of release of topological constraints and molecular crowders. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 150(14):144908, April 2019

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Bacterial chromosome organization. II. few special cross-links, cell confinement, and molecular crowders play the pivotal roles. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(14):144909, April 2019

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    A Hi–C data-integrated model elucidates E

    Abdul Wasim, Ankit Gupta, and Jagannath Mondal. A Hi–C data-integrated model elucidates E. coli chro- mosome’s multiscale organization at various replication stages. Nucleic Acids Research , 49(6):3077–3091, 02 2021

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Spa- tial organization of chromosomes leads to heterogeneous chromatin motion and drives the liquid- or gel-like dy- namical behavior of chromatin

    Hossein Salari, Marco Di Stefano, and Daniel Jost. Spa- tial organization of chromosomes leads to heterogeneous chromatin motion and drives the liquid- or gel-like dy- namical behavior of chromatin. Genome research, 32:28– 43, 1 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Tran- scription regulates the spatio-temporal dynamics of genes through micro-compartmentalization

    Hossein Salari, Genevi` eve Fourel, and Daniel Jost. Tran- scription regulates the spatio-temporal dynamics of genes through micro-compartmentalization. Nature Communi- cations, 15(1), June 2024

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Barbieri, M

    M. Barbieri, M. Chotalia, J. Fraser, L.-M. Lavitas, J. Dostie, A. Pombo, and M. Nicodemi. Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40):16173–16178, September 2012

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Brackley, James Johnson, Steven Kelly, Peter R

    Chris A. Brackley, James Johnson, Steven Kelly, Peter R. Cook, and Davide Marenduzzo. Simulated binding of transcription factors to active and inactive regions folds human chromosomes into loops, rosettes and topological domains. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(8):3503–3512, April 2016

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Chiariello, Carlo Annunziatella, Simona Bianco, Andrea Esposito, and Mario Nicodemi

    Andrea M. Chiariello, Carlo Annunziatella, Simona Bianco, Andrea Esposito, and Mario Nicodemi. Poly- mer physics of chromosome large-scale 3d organisation. Scientific Reports, 6(1), July 2016

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Brems, Tim J

    Jan Roth¨ orl, Maarten A. Brems, Tim J. Stevens, and Pe- ter Virnau. Reconstructing diploid 3d chromatin struc- tures from single cell hi-c data with a polymer-based ap- proach. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 3, December 2023

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Cattoni, Giorgio L

    Quentin Szabo, Daniel Jost, Jia-Ming Chang, Diego I. Cattoni, Giorgio L. Papadopoulos, Boyan Bonev, Tom Sexton, Julian Gurgo, Caroline Jacquier, Marcelo Noll- mann, Fr´ ed´ eric Bantignies, and Giacomo Cavalli. TADs are 3d structural units of higher-order chromosome orga- nization in Drosophila. Science Advances, 4(2), February 2018

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Lioy, Axel Cournac, Martial Marbouty, St´ ephane Duigou, Julien Mozziconacci, Olivier Esp´ eli, Fr´ ed´ eric Boccard, and Romain Koszul

    Virginia S. Lioy, Axel Cournac, Martial Marbouty, St´ ephane Duigou, Julien Mozziconacci, Olivier Esp´ eli, Fr´ ed´ eric Boccard, and Romain Koszul. Multiscale struc- turing of the e. coli chromosome by nucleoid-associated and condensin proteins. Cell, 172(4):771–783.e18, Febru- ary 2018

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Tung B. K. Le, Maxim V. Imakaev, Leonid A. Mirny, and Michael T. Laub. High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science, 342(6159):731–734, November 2013

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Two major mechanisms of chromosome organiza- tion

    Leonid A Mirny, Maxim Imakaev, and Nezar Abden- nur. Two major mechanisms of chromosome organiza- tion. Current Opinion in Cell Biology , 58:142–152, June 2019

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    The 3d genome as moderator of chromosomal communication

    Job Dekker and Leonid Mirny. The 3d genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell, 164(6):1110–1121, March 2016

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes

    Angelo Rosa and Ralf Everaers. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Computational Biol- ogy, 4, 2008

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    Becker, and Ralf Everaers

    Angelo Rosa, Nils B. Becker, and Ralf Everaers. Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. Biophys- ical Journal, 98:2410–2419, 6 2010

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    Halverson, Jan Smrek, Kurt Kremer, and Alexander Y

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Jan Smrek, Kurt Kremer, and Alexander Y. Grosberg. From a melt of rings to chromo- some territories: The role of topological constraints in genome folding, 2 2014

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Alipour and J

    E. Alipour and J. F. Marko. Self-organization of domain structures by dna-loop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(22):11202–11212, October 2012

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Geoffrey Fudenberg, Maxim Imakaev, Carolyn Lu, An- ton Goloborodko, Nezar Abdennur, and Leonid A. Mirny. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Reports, 15(9):2038–2049, May 2016

    work page 2038

  71. [71]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, 18 M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comp. Phys. Comm. ...

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley. Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, second edition edition, 2017

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Ravi Prakash

    Aritra Santra and J. Ravi Prakash. Universality of di- lute solutions of ring polymers in the thermal crossover region between theta and athermal solvents. Journal of Rheology, 66(4):775–792, June 2022

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Powles M

    J.G. Powles M. Calleja, A.N. North and G. Rickayzen. The structure of fluids confined to spherical pores: theory and simulation. Molecular Physics, 73(5):973–983, 1991

    work page 1991

  75. [75]

    Moreno, and Christos N

    Arturo Narros, Angel J. Moreno, and Christos N. Likos. Influence of topology on effective potentials: Coarse- graining ring polymers. Soft Matter, 6:2435–2441, 6 2010

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    Moreno, Arturo Narros, and Christos N

    Marco Bernabei, Petra Bacova, Angel J. Moreno, Arturo Narros, and Christos N. Likos. Fluids of semiflexible ring polymers: effective potentials and clustering. Soft Mat- ter, 9(4):1287–1300, 2013

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    Soft matter multi-blob coarse graining for ring polymer solutions

    Arturo Narros, Christos N Likos, Angel J Moreno, and Barbara Capone. Soft matter multi-blob coarse graining for ring polymer solutions. 10:9587–9758

    work page

  78. [78]

    Moreno, and Christos N

    Arturo Narros, Angel J. Moreno, and Christos N. Likos. Architecture-induced size asymmetry and effective inter- actions of ring polymers: Simulation and theory. Macro- molecules, 46(23):9437–9445, November 2013

    work page 2013

  79. [79]

    Molitor, Audrey Mossler, Nezih Karasu, Daniel Jost, and Tom Sexton

    Sanjay Chahar, Yousra Ben Zouari, Hossein Salari, Do- minique Kobi, Manon Maroquenne, Cathie Erb, Anne M. Molitor, Audrey Mossler, Nezih Karasu, Daniel Jost, and Tom Sexton. Transcription induces context-dependent remodeling of chromatin architecture during differentia- tion. PLOS Biology, 21(12):e3002424, December 2023

    work page 2023