pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.20874 · v4 · pith:XWIX2BCPnew · submitted 2025-02-28 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· quant-ph

Entanglement between accelerated probes in a de Sitter spacetime

Mayank , K. Hari , Subhajit Barman , Dawood Kothawala This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph
keywords entanglementde Sitter spacetimeaccelerated probesvacuum correlationsUnruh-DeWitt detectorsquantum fields in curved spacetime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Entanglement between accelerated probes in de Sitter spacetime does not follow the same effective acceleration mapping as individual probe responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how vacuum entanglement arises between quantum probes that accelerate in de Sitter spacetime with curvature parameter Lambda. It obtains exact results for several setups in which initially uncorrelated probes accelerate in different directions. A single probe responds to the vacuum exactly as it would with effective acceleration sqrt of a squared plus Lambda in flat space, but the entanglement generated between two probes admits no such generic mapping. Instead the strength of the induced correlations changes independently when acceleration or curvature is varied, and the dependence differs according to the relative motion of the detectors.

Core claim

Although a single uniformly accelerated probe in de Sitter space with acceleration a responds to the vacuum exactly as a probe with acceleration sqrt(a squared plus Lambda) would in Minkowski space, the entanglement generated between two such probes does not admit a similar mapping. The non-local correlations induced by the de Sitter-invariant vacuum on probes that couple locally to the field depend on acceleration and curvature in configuration-dependent ways that cannot be reduced to an effective flat-space acceleration.

What carries the argument

Non-local correlations created between initially uncorrelated accelerated probes through their local interaction with the quantum field prepared in the de Sitter-invariant vacuum.

If this is right

  • Entanglement exhibits independent variations with changes in acceleration and curvature depending on detector-motion configurations.
  • No generic equivalence exists between de Sitter and Minkowski spacetime for the entanglement of multiple probes.
  • The interaction with the quantum field creates non-local correlations between probes accelerating in different directions.
  • Exact results hold for several distinct kinematical setups of the probes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement may therefore function as a curvature probe whose sensitivity differs from that of single-detector thermality.
  • Analogous independence could appear when the same detectors are placed in other curved backgrounds or prepared in different vacua.
  • Laboratory analogs of accelerated motion in effective curved geometries could test whether measured entanglement deviates from the single-probe effective-acceleration prediction.

Load-bearing premise

The probes follow uniform acceleration trajectories in de Sitter space and interact with the quantum field through standard local couplings while the field is in its de Sitter-invariant vacuum.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of an entanglement measure for any pair of probes whose value equals the corresponding Minkowski-space result computed at the effective acceleration q for every kinematical configuration would falsify the claim that no generic mapping exists.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.20874 by Dawood Kothawala, K. Hari, Mayank, Subhajit Barman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The above figures illustrate the trajectories of uniform acceleration in the embedding space of de Sitter spacetime. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: In the above figure we have illustrated the flat cosmological patch in a de Sitter hyperboloid. In both of the above [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We will be using the expression of Σ2 obtained here in the next section, where we estimate the entanglement between the detectors. III. ENTANGLEMENT BETWEEN ACCELERATED DETECTORS In this section, we estimate the entanglement, especially the measure of it in terms of Negativity. In this regard, we consider two specific scenarios of switching functions. First, we consider the eternal interaction between the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: In the above figure we present contour plots for Negativity rate ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The above figure depicts contour plots for Negativity rate ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In the Minkowski spacetime, the expressions of the local and nonlocal terms in Negativity are obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: In the left we have plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: On the left, we have plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: This figure indicates a peak in Negativity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The Negativity is plotted in the small acceleration limit with Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: The Negativity rate ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: The Negativity rate ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We initiate an investigation into features of vacuum entanglement as probed by accelerated quantum probes in curved spacetime. Focussing specifically on de Sitter (dS) spacetime with curvature $\Lambda$, we obtain several exact results corresponding to different kinematical set-up of the probes. The interaction with the quantum field creates a non-local correlation between initially uncorrelated probes accelerating in different directions. It is well known that a single quantum probe in dS spacetime with uniform acceleration $a$ responds exactly as a quantum probe in Minkowski spacetime with "effective" acceleration $q \equiv\sqrt{a^2+\Lambda}$. However, no such mapping generically exists for the entanglement between probes. Our results suggest that entanglement exhibits independent variations with changes in acceleration and curvature depending on different configurations of detector motion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates vacuum entanglement between accelerated Unruh-DeWitt probes in de Sitter spacetime with curvature parameter Λ. It derives exact results for several specific kinematical configurations in which initially uncorrelated detectors accelerate in different directions while coupled to the de Sitter-invariant vacuum. The central claim is that, while the response of a single detector is indistinguishable from that of a detector with effective acceleration q ≡ √(a² + Λ) in Minkowski spacetime, no such generic mapping exists for the entanglement between two probes; instead, the entanglement exhibits independent variations with a and Λ that depend on the particular detector trajectories.

Significance. If the exact results hold, the work provides concrete evidence that non-local correlations between probes cannot be reduced to the single-probe effective-acceleration parameter that governs local responses. This distinction between local and non-local probes of curvature and acceleration is of interest to the quantum-field-theory-in-curved-spacetime community. The manuscript's strength lies in obtaining exact, configuration-specific results rather than general no-go theorems, which supplies falsifiable, checkable predictions for particular trajectories.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'no such mapping generically exists' would be clearer if it explicitly distinguished between a general proof and the demonstration that the mapping fails in the specific configurations for which exact results are reported.
  2. The manuscript should state the precise entanglement measure (e.g., concurrence, negativity) employed and give the explicit two-point-function expressions used for at least one representative configuration so that the independence from q can be verified directly.
  3. Notation: ensure that the symbols a, Λ, and q are defined at first use and that any coordinate choices or frame conventions for the accelerated trajectories are summarized in a dedicated section or appendix.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, including the summary of our central claim regarding the distinction between single-probe effective acceleration and two-probe entanglement in de Sitter spacetime. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper performs explicit calculations of entanglement measures for several specific detector trajectories in de Sitter space using the standard Unruh-DeWitt coupling to the dS-invariant vacuum. The reported distinction—that single-probe response admits an effective-acceleration map q=sqrt(a²+Λ) while two-probe entanglement does not admit a generic such map and instead varies independently with a and Λ—is obtained directly from those configuration-dependent computations rather than from any redefinition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No step in the provided abstract or described results reduces the central claim to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard domain assumptions of quantum field theory in curved spacetime but introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities that are visible at the abstract level.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a de Sitter-invariant vacuum state for the quantum field and standard local coupling of accelerated probes to that field.
    Implicit in the setup of accelerated probes responding to the vacuum in dS spacetime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1235 out tokens · 40030 ms · 2026-05-23T02:13:24.159533+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity 7

    work page

  2. [2]

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity 7

    work page

  3. [3]

    Finite Gaussian switching 10

    Observations on the rate of Negativity 8 B. Finite Gaussian switching 10

    work page

  4. [4]

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity 10

    work page

  5. [5]

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity 10

    work page

  6. [6]

    Analysis of the maxima in Negativity 15 A

    Observations on Negativity 14 IV. Analysis of the maxima in Negativity 15 A. Minkowski background 15 B. de Sitter background 16 V. Discussion 17 Acknowledgements 19 A. Different integrals for eternal switching 19

    work page

  7. [7]

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity 19

    work page

  8. [8]

    Different integrals for the Gaussian switching 21

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity 20 B. Different integrals for the Gaussian switching 21

    work page

  9. [9]

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity 21

    work page

  10. [10]

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity 22 C. Negativity for accelerated trajectories in the same wedge 23 ∗Electronic address: mayank@physics.iitm.ac.in †Electronic address: hari.k@iitb.ac.in ‡Electronic address: subhajit.barman@physics.iitm.ac.in §Electronic address: dawood@iitm.ac.in arXiv:2502.20874v4 [gr-qc] 28 May 2025 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Minkowski background 23

    work page

  12. [12]

    INTRODUCTION Accelerated frames have always played a crucial role in understanding the physical processes happening in a curved background

    de Sitter background 24 References 25 I. INTRODUCTION Accelerated frames have always played a crucial role in understanding the physical processes happening in a curved background. For instance, phenomena such as the gravitational time dilation and the Hawking effect are better understood in their analogies from accelerated frames in Minkowski spacetime. ...

    work page

  13. [13]

    We would also like to mention that when I1 = I2 = I the above expression of Negativity simplifies to N = |Iϵ| − I

    We have not included this factor in Negativity as it denotes a fixed interaction strength and does not carry any information about the background or the motion of the probes. We would also like to mention that when I1 = I2 = I the above expression of Negativity simplifies to N = |Iϵ| − I. The manuscript is organized in the following manner. In Sec. II we ...

    work page

  14. [14]

    The chordal distance between the two detectors, in this case, can be obtained from (12)

    Case I : The trajectories are in the same static patch, i.e., they are in the same causal patch, with different magnitudes of acceleration. The chordal distance between the two detectors, in this case, can be obtained from (12). For a schematic diagram of the trajectories in a de Sitter hyperboloid, see Fig. 1

    work page

  15. [15]

    Both 4−acceleration a, and 5 −acceleration q are opposite, a1 = −a2 = |a|; q1 = −q2 = |q|

    Case II : The trajectories are in different static patches with the same magnitudes of acceleration. Both 4−acceleration a, and 5 −acceleration q are opposite, a1 = −a2 = |a|; q1 = −q2 = |q|. In this case, (12) reduces to, Σ2 = 4 q2 cosh2 q 2(τ2 + τ1) (14) The above equation is the same as the geodesic interval between two trajectories in opposite Rindler...

    work page

  16. [16]

    The 4 and 5 accelerations are related by, a1 = −a2 = a; q1 = q2 = q

    Case III : The trajectories are in the same static patch with the same magnitudes of acceleration but are oriented in θ = 0 and θ = π planes respectively of de Sitter spacetime. The 4 and 5 accelerations are related by, a1 = −a2 = a; q1 = q2 = q. Equation 12 simplifies to, Σ2 = 2 Λq2 q2 + a2 − Λ cosh (q(τ2 − τ1)) (15)

    work page

  17. [17]

    The 4 and 5 accelerations are related by, a1 = a2 = a; q1 = −q2 = q

    Case IV : The trajectories are in different static patches with the same magnitude of acceleration but are oriented in θ = 0 and θ = π planes respectively of de Sitter spacetime. The 4 and 5 accelerations are related by, a1 = a2 = a; q1 = −q2 = q. Equation 12 simplifies to, Σ2 = 2 Λq2 q2 + a2 + Λ cosh (q(τ2 + τ1)) . (16) similar to Case II, here also if o...

    work page

  18. [18]

    In this regard, we consider the Wightman function for detectors in accelerated trajectories in a de Sitter background as obtained from Eq

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity Here we evaluate the local terms I1 with the eternal switching χ(τ). In this regard, we consider the Wightman function for detectors in accelerated trajectories in a de Sitter background as obtained from Eq. (9a) using Eqs. (10) and (12). We utilize this Wightman function in Eq. (4a) to find the local terms I1. ...

    work page

  19. [19]

    III, we consider the expression of the Feynman propagator from Eq

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity • Case I: To evaluate the rate of the nonlocal term Rε corresponding to the eternal switching and the detector trajectories of Case I from Sec. III, we consider the expression of the Feynman propagator from Eq. (9b). Moreover, to evaluate the nonlocal integral Iε we consider a change of variables v = τ1 + τ2 ...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Taking the expression of Negativity from 9 FIG

    Observations on the rate of Negativity Here we express the Negativity, more precisely the Negativity rates, corresponding to different accelerated detector trajectories in the de Sitter background for eternal switching, i.e., χ(τ) = 1. Taking the expression of Negativity from 9 FIG. 3: (Eternal switching) Case II: In the above figure we have plotted the r...

    work page

  21. [21]

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity For the Gaussian switching, we first try to evaluate the local terms I1 as specified in Eq. (4a). In this regard, a suitable way forward is to consider a change of variables to u = τ1 − τ ′ 1 and τ = τ1. Here we should mention that in both Minkowski and de Sitter backgrounds if the detectors are accelerated the ...

    work page

  22. [22]

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity Before we proceed to evaluate the nonlocal entangling term Iε, we would like to recall that there were four different pairs of detector trajectories that we considered in Sec. II. These trajectories are illustrated in Fig. 1. We shall 11 consider each of these cases corresponding to the different pair of traj...

    work page

  23. [23]

    We also provide comparisons of these results with respect to the Minkowski Negativity

    Observations on Negativity In this part of the section, we provide analysis for Negativity corresponding to the four scenarios in de Sitter space as obtained in terms of I1 and Iϵ mentioned in the previous section. We also provide comparisons of these results with respect to the Minkowski Negativity. Here, we consider the particular situation when the det...

    work page

  24. [24]

    In this limit, we expect to recover the results already obtained in Ref

    Let us start by considering the geodesic limit of our accelerated congruence, which requires some care. In this limit, we expect to recover the results already obtained in Ref. [24]. The initial separation of the accelerated trajectories in the small acceleration limit can be obtained by evaluating the geodesic distance σgeod from Eq. (10) by putting τ1 =...

    work page

  25. [25]

    We can rearrange Eq

    We would also like to point out another interesting fact about our accelerated congruence. We can rearrange Eq. (32) to solve for a1 = a, for a given a2 = a0 (considered as a reference curve). The corresponding expression turns out to be the same as the one obtained in [36] by imposing rigidity condition on congruences in curved spacetimes: an = √ Λ tan √...

    work page

  26. [26]

    In particular, we observe that for eter- nal switching, detectors only in anti-parallel acceleration can have non-vanishing entanglement between them

    Finally, we list and discuss some generic features of our observations. In particular, we observe that for eter- nal switching, detectors only in anti-parallel acceleration can have non-vanishing entanglement between them. Whereas, for finite Gaussian switching even detectors in parallel acceleration can get entangled. Our generic observations in both the...

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    (12) and (9a)

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity The Wightman function for detectors in accelerated trajectories in a de Sitter background is obtained from Eqs. (12) and (9a). In particular, the explicit expression of the Wightman function for the first detector is given by GW (τ1, τ ′

    work page

  28. [28]

    = − 1 4π2 q2 1 4 sinh2 q1 2 (τ1 − τ ′

    work page

  29. [29]

    (A1) We consider a change of variables as u = τ1 − τ ′ 1 and τ = τ1

    − iϵ . (A1) We consider a change of variables as u = τ1 − τ ′ 1 and τ = τ1. Then from Eq. (4a) one can find the local terms I1 as I1 = Z ∞ −∞ dτ Z ∞ −∞ du e−i ω u GW (u, v) = − q2 1 16π2 Z ∞ −∞ dτ Z ∞ −∞ du e−i ω u sinh2 q1 u 2 − iϵ = ω π 1 e2πω/q − 1 Z ∞ −∞ dτ . (A2) It is to be noted that the above quantity signifies the individual detector transition p...

    work page

  30. [30]

    (4b), and different detector trajectories

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity In this regard, we consider the integral representation of Iε from Eq. (4b), and different detector trajectories. • Case I: First, we consider a pair of detector trajectories as specified in Case I of Sec. III. In this scenario, one can notice that for eternal switching only poles for ( τ1 + τ2) in the upper ...

    work page

  31. [31]

    We consider a change of variables to u = τj − τ ′ j and τ = τj, and proceed to evaluate Ij in the Minkowski background

    Evaluation of the local terms in Negativity Here we evaluate the local terms Ij as specified in (4a) with the Gaussian switching. We consider a change of variables to u = τj − τ ′ j and τ = τj, and proceed to evaluate Ij in the Minkowski background. In particular, in the Minkowski spacetime, we have the following expression for these local terms, Ij,M = −...

    work page

  32. [32]

    II and illustrated in fig 1

    Evaluation of the non-local term in Negativity There are four cases for non-local terms (terms denoting inter-detector correlation) that depend on the choice of accelerations for detector trajectories as discussed in Sec. II and illustrated in fig 1. Here, we estimate each case separately. • Case I: This case corresponds to two trajectories in the same st...

    work page

  33. [33]

    We solved the equation of motion uµ∇µuν = aν for uniformly accelerated observer with initial data (x(0) = x0, ˙x(0) = 0)

    Minkowski background First, we consider Negativity for accelerated trajectories having the same uniform acceleration a in Minkowski spacetime. We solved the equation of motion uµ∇µuν = aν for uniformly accelerated observer with initial data (x(0) = x0, ˙x(0) = 0). The equation of trajectories for two uniformly accelerated detectors with this initial data ...

    work page

  34. [34]

    de Sitter background Second, we consider uniformly accelerated curves in de Sitter spacetime. The trajectories can be suitably written in terms of static coordinates ( t, r, θ, ϕ) with ( θ0 = π/2) as follows [30], Tj = r 1 Λ − r2 0 sinh(tj √ Λ) (C3a) Xj = r 1 Λ − r2 0 cosh(tj √ Λ) (C3b) Yj = r0 cos(θ0) (C3c) Zj = r0 sin(θ0) cos ϕ0 + d0 r0 δj,2 (C3d) Wj = ...

    work page

  35. [35]

    D. J. Stargen and K. Lochan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111303 (2022), arXiv:2107.00049

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum , Found

    B. Reznik, Found. Phys. 33, 167 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0212044

    work page arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    Violating Bell's inequalities in the vacuum

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042104 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0310058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    Causality issues of particle detector models in QFT and Quantum Optics

    E. Martin-Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104019 (2015), arXiv:1509.07864

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Tjoa and E

    E. Tjoa and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D104, 125005 (2021), arXiv:2109.11561

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    G. L. Ver Steeg and N. C. Menicucci, Phys. Rev. D 79, 044027 (2009), arXiv:0711.3066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [41]

    Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms

    J. Hu and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012327 (2015), arXiv:1501.03321

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Pozas-Kerstjens and E

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martin-Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064042 (2015), arXiv:1506.03081

    work page arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Entanglement dynamics in a Kerr spacetime

    G. Menezes, Phys. Rev. D97, 085021 (2018), arXiv:1712.07151

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    J.-I. Koga, G. Kimura, and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062338 (2018), arXiv:1804.01183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    J.-i. Koga, K. Maeda, and G. Kimura, Phys. Rev. D 100, 065013 (2019), arXiv:1906.02843

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    W. Cong, C. Qian, M. R. R. Good, and R. B. Mann, JHEP 10, 067 (2020), arXiv:2006.01720

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Zhang and H

    J. Zhang and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065013 (2020), arXiv:2008.07980

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Barman, D

    S. Barman, D. Barman, and B. R. Majhi, JHEP 09, 106 (2022), arXiv:2112.01308

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Barman, S

    D. Barman, S. Barman, and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045005 (2022), arXiv:2205.08505

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Barman and B

    S. Barman and B. R. Majhi, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 70 (2024), arXiv:2301.06764

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    E. G. Brown, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062336 (2013), arXiv:1309.1425

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Harvesting correlations from thermal and squeezed coherent states

    P. Simidzija and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D98, 085007 (2018), arXiv:1809.05547

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Barman, S

    D. Barman, S. Barman, and B. R. Majhi, JHEP 07, 124 (2021), arXiv:2104.11269

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Q. Xu, S. A. Ahmad, and A. R. H. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065019 (2020), arXiv:2006.11301

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    F. Gray, D. Kubiznak, T. May, S. Timmerman, and E. Tjoa, JHEP 11, 054 (2021), arXiv:2105.09337

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Barman, I

    S. Barman, I. Chakraborty, and S. Mukherjee, JHEP 09, 180 (2023), arXiv:2305.17735

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Barman, I

    S. Barman, I. Chakraborty, and S. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. D 111, 025021 (2025), arXiv:2405.18277

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    K. Hari, S. Barman, and D. Kothawala, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065017 (2024), arXiv:2311.15019

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Nature Physics 11, 668 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Hari and D

    K. Hari and D. Kothawala, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064032 (2021), arXiv:2106.14496

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Hari and D

    K. Hari and D. Kothawala, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104073 (2024), arXiv:2307.16413

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity (1972)

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity (1972)

    work page 1972

  65. [65]

    Deser and O

    S. Deser and O. Levin, Classical and Quantum Gravity 14, L163 (1997), arXiv:9706018. 26

    work page 1997

  66. [66]

    Allen, Phys

    B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D 32, 3136 (1985)

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    Unruh response functions for scalar fields in de Sitter space

    B. Garbrecht and T. Prokopec, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 4993 (2004), gr-qc/0404058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1973)

    work page 1973

  69. [69]

    Sriramkumar and T

    L. Sriramkumar and T. Padmanabhan, Classical and Quantum Gravity 13, 2061 (1996)

    work page 2061

  70. [70]

    Kothawala, Phys

    D. Kothawala, Phys. Rev. D 110, L121502 (2024), arXiv:2403.16229

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    T. R. Perche, C. Lima, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D105, 065016 (2022), arXiv:2111.12779

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Kothawala, Int

    D. Kothawala, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2342021 (2023), arXiv:2305.09265

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Duality and zero-point length of spacetime

    T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1854 (1997), hep-th/9608182

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  74. [74]

    Kempf, Front

    A. Kempf, Front. in Phys. 9, 247 (2021), arXiv:2110.08278

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    S´ anchez-Kuntz, A

    N. S´ anchez-Kuntz, A. Parra-L´ opez, M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, T. Haas, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. D105, 105020 (2022), arXiv:2202.10440

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Barman, B

    S. Barman, B. R. Majhi, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D 109, 105025 (2024), arXiv:2205.01305

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    C. F. Schmidt, A. Parra-L´ opez, M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Floerchinger (2024), arXiv:2406.08094

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Agullo, A

    I. Agullo, A. Delhom, and A. Parra-L´ opez (2024), arXiv:2411.09596

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.0, champaign, IL, 2024, URL https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica

    Wolfram Research. Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.0, champaign, IL, 2024, URL https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica

    work page 2024