pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.06941 · v2 · pith:FSLJZQXSnew · submitted 2026-02-06 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Models

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelssteeringexpliciton-topicactivationagencyenterprisecontrolsendogenous
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models can recover mid-generation from task-misaligned activation steering, producing explicit verbal restarts (e.g., ``wait, that's not right'') and continuing on-topic even while the steering perturbation remains active. We term this Endogenous Steering Resistance (ESR). Using sparse autoencoder (SAE) latents to steer model activations, we find that Llama-3.3-70B exhibits explicit ESR at \llamaseventyEsrRate\%, with smaller models from the Llama-3 and Gemma-2 families showing the explicit form less frequently. Two controls dissociate ESR into a detection event and a sustained-resistance component that conditioning on recent on-topic tokens does not fully explain. We identify \numOtdLatents{} SAE latents through contrastive on-topic/off-topic search; zero-ablating them reduces the multi-attempt rate by \multiAttemptReductionPct\%, with random-latent and held-out-prompt controls supporting specificity. ESR can also be deliberately enhanced through both meta-prompting and fine-tuning on synthetic self-correction examples. ESR has dual implications for safety: it could harden models against adversarial activation-space manipulation, but may equally interfere with beneficial steering-based interventions, since the model has no way to distinguish the two. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/agencyenterprise/endogenous-steering-resistance}{github.com/agencyenterprise/endogenous-steering-resistance}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decodable but Not Corrected by Fixed Residual-Stream Linear Steering: Evidence from Medical LLM Failure Regimes

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Overthinking in medical QA is linearly decodable at 71.6% accuracy yet fixed residual-stream steering yields no correction across 29 configurations, while enabling selective abstention with AUROC 0.610.