pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.29241 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math.PR

Mean first passage times of higher-dimensional velocity jump processes

Maria R. D'Orsogna , Alan E. Lindsay , Thomas Hillen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math.PR
keywords mean first passage timevelocity jump processesKnudsen numberdirectional biasangular distributionsnarrow capture limitsurvival probability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Velocity jump processes in higher dimensions reduce to a universal mean first passage time form at low Knudsen numbers via two bias functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework to compute mean first passage times and survival probability moments for fixed-speed velocity jump processes in higher dimensions, covering reorientation from strong alignment to full anisotropy. When the mean free path is small relative to the target distance, the MFPT collapses to a universal expression set by two bias functions that together capture many angular distributions including von Mises-Fisher and wrapped Cauchy. This matters because persistent motion appears in molecular transport, cell migration, and other systems where standard diffusion approximations fail to predict escape times accurately. The same reduction yields a Langevin description whose first-passage statistics match direct simulations.

Core claim

In the low Knudsen number regime the mean first passage time for fixed-speed velocity jump processes is given by a universal expression governed by two bias functions that encode broad classes of angular reorientation distributions. The framework also supplies higher moments of the survival probability and an equivalent Langevin representation that reproduces the statistics.

What carries the argument

Two bias functions that encode the angular distributions of velocity reorientations, reducing the higher-dimensional process to an effective description valid for families such as von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical distributions.

If this is right

  • In the narrow capture limit directional persistence produces anomalous MFPT scaling, including regimes where the time remains finite while diffusion predicts divergence.
  • Higher moments of the survival probability are obtained from the same bias-function description.
  • An equivalent Langevin process reproduces the first-passage statistics of the original jump process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bias-function reduction could be tested on search problems in biology where organisms exhibit persistent turning.
  • Extension to time-dependent targets or spatially varying speed would provide a direct check of the low-Knudsen assumption.
  • The same two-function structure may apply to threshold-crossing problems in finance or materials science that share persistent directional motion.

Load-bearing premise

The mean free path being small compared to the target distance, together with the fixed-speed model and the chosen families of angular reorientation distributions, permits reduction to the claimed universal MFPT form.

What would settle it

A numerical realization of the velocity jump process using one of the covered angular distributions at low Knudsen number that produces an MFPT differing from the predicted universal expression would disprove the reduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29241 by Alan E. Lindsay, Maria R. D'Orsogna, Thomas Hillen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The von Mises angular distribution in Eq. 11 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Analytical estimates from Eq. 15 (curves) and particle simulations (squares) of the MFPT to the boundary of a ball [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Two-dimensional particles searching for the locus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

First passage phenomena arise across physics, biology, and finance when stochastic processes first reach a threshold, triggering downstream events. Examples include the irreversible exit from a domain, a biochemical reaction, a financial selloff. While typical formulations involve diffusive motion, many stochastic processes are better described as velocity jump processes, characterized by persistent motion interrupted by stochastic velocity changes. Despite their ubiquity, first-passage properties of velocity jump processes remain underdeveloped in higher dimensions, especially under directional bias. We present a general framework to estimate the mean first passage time (MFPT) and higher moments of the survival probability for fixed-speed velocity jump processes where possible reorientations range from strong alignment to full angular anisotropy. For low Knudsen numbers, when the mean free path is small compared to the distance to the target, we derive a universal form for the MFPT in which two bias functions encode broad classes of angular distributions, including von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical families. In the narrow capture limit of a vanishingly small target, directional persistence induces anomalous scaling, including regimes where the MFPT remains finite whereas standard diffusion would predict divergence. Finally, we obtain a Langevin representation that accurately reproduces first-passage statistics. Analytical predictions are confirmed by numerical simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for the mean first passage time (MFPT) and higher moments of the survival probability for fixed-speed velocity jump processes in higher dimensions. In the low Knudsen number regime (mean free path small relative to target distance), it derives a universal asymptotic MFPT form controlled by two bias functions that encode broad classes of angular reorientation distributions, including von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical families. It further identifies anomalous scaling induced by directional persistence in the narrow-capture limit and supplies a Langevin representation whose first-passage statistics are stated to match numerical simulations.

Significance. If the low-Knudsen reduction is rigorously controlled, the result supplies a compact analytical description of persistent first-passage statistics that collapses a wide range of angular kernels onto two bias functions and exposes persistence-driven anomalies absent from standard diffusion; this would be a useful advance for modeling in statistical mechanics, biology, and related fields.

major comments (2)
  1. [Low-Knudsen derivation (§3–4)] Low-Knudsen derivation (abstract and §3–4): the claimed universal MFPT form controlled by two bias functions is asserted to hold uniformly for von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical families, yet no explicit error bounds, remainder estimates, or uniformity statement with respect to the concentration parameters or higher moments of the angular kernel are supplied. This omission is load-bearing for the universality claim.
  2. [Narrow-capture limit (§5)] Narrow-capture limit (abstract and §5): the statement that directional persistence yields finite MFPT while diffusion diverges is central, but the supporting asymptotic analysis is presented without a clear statement of the scaling regime or the precise conditions on the bias functions that guarantee the claimed anomaly.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that analytical predictions are confirmed by numerical simulations but supplies no quantitative error metrics, parameter ranges, or data-exclusion criteria; these details should be added for reproducibility.
  2. [Bias-function definitions] Notation for the two bias functions is introduced without an explicit table or appendix listing their closed-form expressions for each named angular family; a compact reference table would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised will help improve the rigor and clarity of the presentation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Low-Knudsen derivation (abstract and §3–4): the claimed universal MFPT form controlled by two bias functions is asserted to hold uniformly for von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical families, yet no explicit error bounds, remainder estimates, or uniformity statement with respect to the concentration parameters or higher moments of the angular kernel are supplied. This omission is load-bearing for the universality claim.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit error bounds and uniformity statements weakens the universality claim. In the revised manuscript we will add remainder estimates for the low-Knudsen expansion in §§3–4, together with a uniformity statement that makes the dependence on the concentration parameter (or equivalent moments) of each angular kernel explicit. This will be done for the von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, and elliptical families, thereby delineating the regime in which the two-bias-function reduction holds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Narrow-capture limit (abstract and §5): the statement that directional persistence yields finite MFPT while diffusion diverges is central, but the supporting asymptotic analysis is presented without a clear statement of the scaling regime or the precise conditions on the bias functions that guarantee the claimed anomaly.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the scaling regime and the precise conditions on the bias functions are not stated with sufficient clarity. In the revised §5 we will explicitly define the narrow-capture scaling (target radius ε→0 with fixed mean free path) and the required properties of the bias functions (e.g., their leading-order behavior for small angles) that ensure the MFPT remains finite. A short comparison with the divergent diffusive case will also be added. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a standard asymptotic reduction from the velocity-jump model

full rationale

The paper derives the claimed universal MFPT form in the low-Knudsen regime via asymptotic analysis of the fixed-speed velocity-jump process, expressing the result in terms of two bias functions that are explicitly constructed from the given angular reorientation kernels (von Mises-Fisher, wrapped Cauchy, elliptical). This is a forward reduction from the integro-differential master equation to an effective PDE or integral equation whose coefficients are functionals of the kernel; the bias functions are not fitted to MFPT data nor defined in terms of the target quantity. No self-citation is invoked as the sole justification for the central step, and the narrow-capture anomalous scaling follows directly from the same expansion without circular renaming or imported uniqueness theorems. The framework remains self-contained against the stated model assumptions and does not reduce any prediction to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the low-Knudsen-number approximation and the fixed-speed velocity-jump model; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities. No free parameters are explicitly fitted to the MFPT data in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Fixed-speed velocity jump process with stochastic reorientations
    The model assumes particles move at constant speed between instantaneous velocity changes drawn from a given angular distribution.
  • domain assumption Low Knudsen number limit (mean free path << distance to target)
    The universal MFPT form is derived under the explicit assumption that the mean free path is small compared with the target distance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5525 in / 1505 out tokens · 63001 ms · 2026-05-14T00:05:21.990652+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Universality and ambiguity in extremes of anomalous diffusion

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    For scaled Brownian motion, Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion, and fractional Brownian motion, the fastest first passage time decays logarithmically with searcher number and subdiffusion can be faster than ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N. G. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981)

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Klages, G

    R. Klages, G. Radons, and I. M. Sokolov,Anomalous Transport(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec,Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    S. A. Iyaniwura and Z. Peng,New J. Phys.27, 104401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    P. C. Bressloff and J. M. Newby,Phys. Rev. E83, 061139 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Scacchi and A

    A. Scacchi and A. Sharma,Mol. Phys.116, 460–464 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    A. Dhar, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, S. Sabhapandit, and G. Schehr,Phys. Rev. E99, 032132 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Angelani, R

    L. Angelani, R. Di Lionardo, and M. Paoluzzi,Eur. Phys. J. E37, 59 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Perell´ o, M

    J. Perell´ o, M. Guti´ errez-Roig, and J. Masoliver,Phys. Rev. E84, 066110 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Masoliver and J

    J. Masoliver and J. Perell´ o,Phys. Rev. E78, 056104 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    T. R. Bielecki and M. Rutkowski, inCredit Risk: Mod- eling, Valuation and Hedging(Springer Finance, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004)

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Kurella, J

    V. Kurella, J. C. Tzou, D. Coombs, and M. Ward,Bull. Math. Biol.77, 83–125 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    A. C. Costa, G. Sridhar, C. Wyart, and M. Vergassola, PRX Life2, 023001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Fauchald and T

    P. Fauchald and T. Torkild,Ecol.84, 282–288 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    B´ enichou, C

    O. B´ enichou, C. Loverdo, M. Moreau, and R. Voituriez, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 81 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Heaviside,Electrical papers of Oliver Heaviside, vol- ume I(Chelsea, New York, 1970)

    O. Heaviside,Electrical papers of Oliver Heaviside, vol- ume I(Chelsea, New York, 1970)

    work page 1970

  17. [17]

    Angelani,J

    L. Angelani,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.48, 495003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Hillen and K

    T. Hillen and K. J. Painter, inDispersal, individual move- ment and spatial ecology(Springer, 2013), pp. 177–222

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Hillen,Math

    T. Hillen,Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.12, 1007– 1034 (2002)

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Datta, C

    A. Datta, C. Beta, and R. Großmann,Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043281 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)

    S. Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    K. R. Ghusinga, J. J. Dennehy, and A. Singh,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 693–698 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    M. R. D’Orsogna and T. Chou,PLoS One4, e8165 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    S. A. Nowak and T. Chou,Biophys. J.96, 2624–2636 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    P. C. Bressloff and J. M. Newby,Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 135 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Condamin, V

    S. Condamin, V. Tejedor, R. Voituriez, O. B´ enichou, and J. Klafter,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 5675 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    C. W. Gardiner,Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences(Springer Berlin, 2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    B. M. S. Arani, S. R. Carpenter, L. Lahti, E. H. van Nes, and M. Scheffer,Science372, eaay4895 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    S. Mao, T. Chou, and M. R. D’Orsogna,Math. Biosci. 372, 109184 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Klinger, R

    J. Klinger, R. Voituriez, and O. B´ enichou,Phys. Rev. E 107, 054109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    B. A. Camley and W. J. Rappel,Phys. Rev. E89, 062705 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Vezzani and R

    A. Vezzani and R. Burioni,Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 187101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Artuso, G

    R. Artuso, G. Cristadoro, M. Onofri, and M. Radice,J. Stat. Mech.2018, 083209 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    F. J. Sevilla, A. V. Arzola, and E. P. Cital,Phys. Rev. E 99, 012145 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    D. S. Grebenkov,Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 260201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    F. Mori, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 090603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    J. F. Rupprecht, O. B´ enichou, and R. Voituriez,Phys. Rev. E94, 012117 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Hillen, M

    T. Hillen, M. R. D’Orsogna, J. Mantooth, and A. E. Lindsay,SIAM Appl. Math.28, 78–108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    P. C. Hemmer,Physica A27, 79–82 (1961)

    work page 1961

  40. [40]

    Kac,Rocky Mountain J

    M. Kac,Rocky Mountain J. Math.4, 497–510 (1974)

    work page 1974

  41. [41]

    M. R. D’Orsogna, M. Suchard, and T. Chou,Phys. Rev. E68, 021925 (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    G. H. Weiss,Aspects and Applications of the Random Walk(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994)

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    G. H. Weiss,Physica A311, 381–410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathemat- ical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory(Springer, New York, 1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    H. Wu, B. L. Li, T. A. Springer, and W. H. Neill,Ecol. Model.132, 115–124 (2000)

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    Hillen, K

    T. Hillen, K. J. Painter, A. C. Swan, and A. Murtha, Math. Biosci. Eng.14, 673–694 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    I. Bica, T. Hillen, and K. J. Painter,J. Theor. Biol.427, 77–89 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    A. C. Swan, T. Hillen, J. Bowman, and A. Murtha,Bull. Math. Biol.80, 1259–1291 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. Kolokolnikov, and A. E. Lindsay,Eur. J. Appl. Math.(2025), 1–25

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    J. M. Stockie,SIAM Review53, 349–371 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    H¨ ofling and A

    F. H¨ ofling and A. V. Straube,Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043034 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Narazakiet al.,iScience24, 102221 (2021)

    T. Narazakiet al.,iScience24, 102221 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    M. N. Popescu, W. E. Uspal, C. Bechinger, and P. Fis- cher,Nano Lett.18, 5345–5351 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Karani, G

    H. Karani, G. E. Pradillo, and P. M. Vlahovska,Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 208002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Lauga, W

    E. Lauga, W. R. Di Luzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone,Biophys. J.90, 400–412 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    K¨ ummel, B

    F. K¨ ummel, B. ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 198302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    T. C. Schneirla,Am. Mus. Novit.1253, 1–26 (1944)

    work page 1944

  58. [58]

    C. M. Buness, A. Rana, C. C. Maass, and R. Dey,Phys. 7 Rev. Lett.133, 158301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    P. J. Mlynarczyk and S. M. Abel,Phys. Rev. E99, 022406 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    H. W. McKenzie, M. A. Lewis, and E. H. Merrill,Bull. Math. Biol.71, 107–129 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, S. Klumpp, and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. E6, 061911 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Codutti, K

    A. Codutti, K. Bente, D. Faivre, and S. Klumpp,PLoS Comput. Biol.15, e1007548 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Boissard, P

    E. Boissard, P. Degond, and S. Motsch,J. Math. Biol. 66, 1267–1301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Sourjik and N

    V. Sourjik and N. S. Wingreen,Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 262–268 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    Saito, R

    K. Saito, R. Kawano, C. Sadamatsu, Y. Iwashita, and Y. Kimura,Phys. Rev. E111, 045409 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    W. Wang, W. Duan, S. Ahmed, T. E. Mallouk, and A. Sen,Nano Today8, 531–554 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Vezzani, E

    A. Vezzani, E. Barkai, and R. Burioni,100, 012108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    MFPT code repository,

    M. R. D’Orsogna, A. E. Lindsay, and T. Hillen, “MFPT code repository,”https://github.com/dorsogna/MFPT, accessed March 30, 2026

    work page 2026