pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00101 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.str-el· physics.optics

Nonreciprocity-enriched steady phases in open quantum systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elphysics.optics
keywords nonreciprocityopen quantum systemssymmetry breakingdomain wallstraveling waveschiral dynamicsnon-Hermitian skin effectsteady states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong nonreciprocity in open quantum systems turns boundaries into sources and drains of symmetry defects that form a persistent chiral traveling wave.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that nonreciprocity combined with open boundaries generates steady-state phases that go beyond the usual spontaneous symmetry breaking picture in open quantum systems. In a bosonic model with Z2 symmetry, strong nonreciprocity makes boundaries inject and remove symmetry defects while giving those defects chiral motion through the bulk, so the uniform broken-symmetry state is replaced by a domain-wall traveling wave. The same nonreciprocity also produces anomalous chiral relaxation of fluctuations even when symmetry remains unbroken, owing to skin-effect amplification toward the boundary. A reader should care because the result identifies a concrete way that driving, dissipation, and geometry together can stabilize new nonequilibrium orders that periodic-boundary models miss.

Core claim

In the bosonic Z2 model, periodic boundaries support only the conventional symmetric and symmetry-broken phases, whereas open boundaries with sufficiently strong nonreciprocity produce a domain-wall traveling-wave phase in which symmetry defects form a persistent chiral wave. Mean-field theory and truncated Wigner simulations characterize the order parameter and Goldstone-mode fluctuations of this phase and confirm its stability in three dimensions. The same framework also yields anomalous chiral relaxation of local fluctuations even in the absence of symmetry breaking, because the stability matrix exhibits a non-Hermitian skin effect that amplifies fluctuations as they approach a boundary.

What carries the argument

Nonreciprocity that converts open boundaries into sources and drains of symmetry defects while simultaneously imparting chiral dynamics to those defects in the bulk.

If this is right

  • The uniform symmetry-broken state is replaced by the traveling-wave phase under open boundaries.
  • Periodic boundary conditions support only the conventional symmetric and symmetry-broken phases.
  • Steady states without symmetry breaking exhibit anomalous chiral relaxation of fluctuations due to the non-Hermitian skin effect.
  • The traveling-wave phase remains stable and is characterizable by its order parameter and Goldstone modes in three spatial dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same boundary-defect mechanism could generate analogous traveling phases in models with different symmetries or in driven-dissipative lattices.
  • Photonic or atomic arrays with engineered nonreciprocal couplings might realize the chiral wave by direct measurement of defect motion.
  • The non-Hermitian skin effect on fluctuations suggests that similar chiral amplification could appear in other open-system observables even without symmetry breaking.
  • Extending the analysis to time-periodic driving or to systems with multiple conserved quantities could produce richer defect-wave patterns.

Load-bearing premise

Mean-field theory and truncated Wigner simulations continue to describe the long-time steady states accurately when nonreciprocity is strong and boundaries are open.

What would settle it

A long-time simulation or experiment on the bosonic model that shows symmetry defects decaying or freezing into a static uniform broken-symmetry state rather than forming a persistent traveling wave under open boundaries would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00101 by Ding Gu, Zhanpeng Fu, Zhong Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a)(b) Sketch of the model on 2D and 1D lattice. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagram of the model with OBC along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. System-size scaling of the traveling wave coherence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Order parameter under PBC along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonreciprocity can profoundly alter the spectra and dynamics of open quantum systems, yet its impact on the long-time steady-state phases of matter has remained largely unexplored. Here we show that the interplay of nonreciprocity, symmetry defects, and spatial boundaries can generate phases beyond the standard spontaneous-symmetry-breaking paradigm. We demonstrate this mechanism by showing that sufficiently strong nonreciprocity turns boundaries into sources and drains of symmetry defects, while simultaneously endowing these defects with chiral dynamics in the bulk. As a result, the conventional uniform symmetry-broken state gives way to a domain-wall traveling-wave phase, in which symmetry defects form a persistent chiral wave. We showcase this mechanism in a bosonic model with \(Z_{2}\) symmetry, where periodic boundary conditions support only the conventional symmetric and symmetry-broken phases, whereas open boundary conditions allow the traveling-wave phase. We further show that even in the absence of symmetry breaking, the steady state can exhibit anomalous chiral relaxation: owing to the non-Hermitian skin effect in the stability matrix, local fluctuations are chirally amplified as they approach a boundary, where they eventually decay. Combining mean-field theory with truncated Wigner simulations, we characterize these phases, analyze the order parameter and Goldstone-mode fluctuations of the traveling-wave phase, and confirm its existence in three spatial dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that sufficiently strong nonreciprocity in open quantum systems turns boundaries into sources/drains of symmetry defects while imparting chiral dynamics to them in the bulk, replacing the uniform symmetry-broken phase with a persistent domain-wall traveling-wave phase under open (but not periodic) boundary conditions. This is demonstrated in a bosonic Z2-symmetric model using mean-field theory and truncated Wigner simulations, which also characterize the order parameter and Goldstone-mode fluctuations; the work further identifies anomalous chiral relaxation due to the non-Hermitian skin effect even without symmetry breaking, and confirms the traveling-wave phase in three dimensions.

Significance. If the mean-field and truncated Wigner results hold, the work identifies a concrete mechanism by which nonreciprocity, boundaries, and defects generate steady phases outside the standard spontaneous-symmetry-breaking paradigm, with potential relevance to driven-dissipative many-body systems. The combination of analytic mean-field analysis with numerical simulations in 1D and 3D is a positive feature, as is the explicit contrast between open and periodic boundaries.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and numerical characterization section] Abstract and the section on numerical characterization: the central claim that the domain-wall traveling-wave phase exists and is stable in 3D rests on mean-field theory plus truncated Wigner simulations, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative error controls, convergence tests with respect to truncation order, or comparisons against exact diagonalization or other methods in the strong-nonreciprocity, open-boundary regime. Given the non-Hermitian skin effect (explicitly invoked for chiral amplification), boundary fluctuations are expected to be large; without such validation the semiclassical approximation's accuracy for the long-time attractor remains unestablished and is load-bearing for the reported phase diagram.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and numerical characterization section] Abstract and the section on numerical characterization: the central claim that the domain-wall traveling-wave phase exists and is stable in 3D rests on mean-field theory plus truncated Wigner simulations, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative error controls, convergence tests with respect to truncation order, or comparisons against exact diagonalization or other methods in the strong-nonreciprocity, open-boundary regime. Given the non-Hermitian skin effect (explicitly invoked for chiral amplification), boundary fluctuations are expected to be large; without such validation the semiclassical approximation's accuracy for the long-time attractor remains unestablished and is load-bearing for the reported phase diagram.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Our truncated Wigner simulations incorporate leading quantum fluctuations and yield results consistent with mean-field theory across 1D and 3D. We acknowledge that explicit quantitative error controls, convergence tests versus truncation order, and exact-diagonalization benchmarks were not reported in the original manuscript. In the revised version we will add convergence plots for the order parameter and wave velocity with respect to truncation level in the 1D open-boundary regime, together with small-system exact-diagonalization comparisons to benchmark the semiclassical attractor. For 3D we will discuss the expected improvement of the approximation with dimensionality while noting the computational intractability of exact methods; we will also elaborate on how the chiral defect dynamics balance the skin-effect amplification to stabilize the long-time phase. These additions will directly address the concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: phases emerge from independent mean-field and simulation analysis of the model

full rationale

The paper analyzes a bosonic Z2-symmetric model under open vs. periodic boundaries using mean-field theory combined with truncated Wigner simulations. The domain-wall traveling-wave phase and chiral relaxation are shown to arise from the interplay of nonreciprocity, symmetry defects, and boundaries, with explicit characterization of order parameters and Goldstone-mode fluctuations. No steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the results are obtained from the dynamical equations and numerical evolution rather than being presupposed. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the contrasting behavior under periodic boundaries.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so concrete free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted in detail. The approach relies on standard mean-field and truncated-Wigner approximations typical of open-quantum-system studies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5542 in / 1258 out tokens · 38654 ms · 2026-05-09T20:30:58.310885+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Topologically protected long-range correlations in steady states of driven-dissipative bosonic chains

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Non-Hermitian topology in quadratic Liouvillians is encoded in steady-state bosonic correlations, inducing disorder-robust long-range order and Gaussian spatial decay in topological phases versus exponential decay in ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

  2. [2]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal quantum interactions and devices via autonomous feedforward, Phys. Rev. A95, 013837 (2017)

  3. [3]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

  4. [4]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 117103 (2025)

  5. [5]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Dynamical phase transitions in the nonrecip- rocal ising model, Phys. Rev. E111, 034124 (2025)

  6. [6]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequi- librium O(n) models, Phys. Rev. X14, 021052 (2024)

  7. [7]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Nonequi- librium criticality at the onset of time-crystalline order, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 167102 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Asadollahi, and S. Diehl, Kardar-parisi-zhang scaling in time-crystalline matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 047101 (2025)

  9. [9]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal synchronization of active quantum spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)

  10. [10]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170401 (2019)

  11. [11]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- 6 reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nature Physics13, 465 (2017)

  12. [12]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non- reciprocal approaches in non-hermitian quantum sensing, Nature Communications9, 4320 (2018)

  13. [13]

    Y.-X. Wang, C. Wang, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum non- reciprocal interactions via dissipative gauge symmetry, PRX Quantum4, 010306 (2023)

  14. [14]

    G. Lee, T. Jin, Y.-X. Wang, A. McDonald, and A. Clerk, Entanglement phase transition due to reciprocity break- ing without measurement or postselection, PRX Quan- tum5, 010313 (2024)

  15. [15]

    S. E. Begg and R. Hanai, Quantum criticality in open quantum spin chains with nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 120401 (2024)

  16. [16]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological in- variants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

  17. [17]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

  18. [18]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103 (2019)

  19. [19]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401 (2018)

  20. [20]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nature Physics16, 747 (2020)

  21. [21]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nature Physics16, 761 (2020)

  22. [22]

    Ghatak, M

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-hermitian topol- ogy and its bulk–edge correspondence in an ac- tive mechanical metamaterial, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 29561 (2020), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2010580117

  23. [23]

    W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Non-hermitian morphing of topological modes, Nature608, 50 (2022)

  24. [24]

    Xue, M.-R

    W.-T. Xue, M.-R. Li, Y.-M. Hu, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Simple formulas of directional amplification from non- bloch band theory, Phys. Rev. B103, L241408 (2021)

  25. [25]

    T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Liouvillian skin effect: Slowing down of relaxation pro- cesses without gap closing, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 070402 (2021)

  26. [26]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

  27. [27]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025004 (2025)

  28. [28]

    Altman, L

    E. Altman, L. M. Sieberer, L. Chen, S. Diehl, and J. Toner, Two-dimensional superfluidity of exciton po- laritons requires strong anisotropy, Phys. Rev. X5, 011017 (2015)

  29. [29]

    L. He, L. M. Sieberer, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Scaling properties of one-dimensional driven-dissipative conden- sates, Phys. Rev. B92, 155307 (2015)

  30. [30]

    V. N. Gladilin, K. Ji, and M. Wouters, Spatial coher- ence of weakly interacting one-dimensional nonequilib- rium bosonic quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. A90, 023615 (2014)

  31. [31]

    K. Ji, V. N. Gladilin, and M. Wouters, Temporal coher- ence of one-dimensional nonequilibrium quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B91, 045301 (2015)

  32. [32]

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, M. Foss-Feig, and M. F. Maghrebi, Nonequilibrium fixed points of coupled ising models, Phys. Rev. X10, 011039 (2020)

  33. [33]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010314 (2025)

  34. [34]

    Sohal and A

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010313 (2025)

  35. [35]

    T. D. Ellison and M. Cheng, Toward a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions, PRX Quantum6, 010315 (2025)

  36. [36]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

  37. [37]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

  38. [38]

    S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and er- ror correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240405 (2020)

  39. [39]

    Ma, J.-H

    R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Topological phases with average symmetries: The deco- hered, the disordered, and the intrinsic, Phys. Rev. X15, 021062 (2025)

  40. [40]

    L. A. Lessa, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Mixed-state quan- tum anomaly and multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. X15, 011069 (2025)

  41. [41]

    Wang and L

    Z. Wang and L. Li, Anomaly in open quantum systems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases, PRX Quantum6, 010347 (2025)

  42. [42]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023)

  43. [43]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry break- ing in mixed quantum states, PRX Quantum6, 010344 (2025)

  44. [44]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions. i, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion11, 26 (1937)

  45. [45]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1, 3rd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5 (Perga- mon Press, Oxford, 1980)

  46. [46]

    Belyansky, C

    R. Belyansky, C. Weis, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and A. A. Clerk, Phase transitions in nonreciprocal driven- dissipative condensates (2025), arXiv:2502.05267 [quant- ph]

  47. [47]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Stochastic methods, in Quantum Optics(Springer, 2008) pp. 91–120

  48. [48]

    T. E. Lee and H. Sadeghpour, Quantum synchronization of quantum van der pol oscillators with trapped ions, Physical review letters111, 234101 (2013)

  49. [49]

    Deuar, A

    P. Deuar, A. Ferrier, M. Matuszewski, G. Orso, and M. H. Szyma´ nska, Fully quantum scalable description 7 of driven-dissipative lattice models, PRX Quantum2, 010319 (2021)

  50. [50]

    Huber, A

    J. Huber, A. M. Rey, and P. Rabl, Realistic simulations of spin squeezing and cooperative coupling effects in large ensembles of interacting two-level systems, Physical Re- view A105, 013716 (2022). END MA TTER Goldstone modes—Among the various phases dis- cussed in the main context, the most intriguing is the traveling wave phase. Driven by nonreciprocit...