pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22298 · v1 · pith:PHW7DP3Inew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging via two-photon structured encoding

Ziyu He , Kun Huang , Huijie Ma , Wen Zhang , Jianan Fang , Heping Zeng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords temporal ghost imagingmid-infraredtwo-photon absorptionsilicon detectorcompressed sensingultrafast signal reconstructionbroadband detection
3
0 comments X

The pith

Non-degenerate two-photon absorption in a silicon detector enables compact, broadband mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging without external nonlinear crystals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a new approach to temporal ghost imaging in the mid-infrared by using non-degenerate two-photon absorption to transfer temporal modulation from a near-infrared pump directly onto a mid-infrared signal at a silicon detector. The method reconstructs ultrafast waveforms that exceed the detector's electronic bandwidth by more than forty times while achieving high sensitivity and supporting compressed sensing. A sympathetic reader would care because previous MIR TGI techniques relied on nonlinear crystals that impose strict phase-matching conditions, limited spectral range, and complex alignment, restricting practical use. By eliminating the need for these crystals, the system becomes alignment-free, room-temperature, and operable across 2.5 to 3.8 micrometers. This opens pathways for applications in molecular spectroscopy, infrared ranging, and free-space communication.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate a mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging system where a temporally encoded near-infrared pump transfers structured modulation onto the MIR signal via non-degenerate two-photon absorption at a silicon detector, enabling concurrent modulation and detection. This yields reconstructed temporal waveforms that exceed the detector bandwidth by more than fortyfold, with a detection sensitivity of 0.05 pJ/pulse, compressed sensing using 80% fewer measurements, and broadband operation from 2.5 to 3.8 μm.

What carries the argument

Non-degenerate two-photon absorption at the silicon detector, which transfers the temporal structure from the near-infrared pump to the mid-infrared signal for direct detection and reconstruction.

If this is right

  • Reconstructed MIR temporal waveforms exceed the detector bandwidth limit by more than 40 times.
  • Detection achieves a sensitivity of 0.05 pJ per pulse.
  • Compressed sensing allows reconstruction with 80% fewer measurements.
  • Broadband operation is supported across the 2.5-3.8 μm wavelength range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could simplify experimental setups for time-resolved MIR studies by removing crystal alignment requirements.
  • Extension to other detector materials might enable similar ghost imaging in additional spectral bands.
  • The high sensitivity and reduced measurement count suggest potential for real-time applications in high-speed infrared communications.
  • Integration with existing silicon-based technologies could lead to more compact devices for precision ranging.

Load-bearing premise

The non-degenerate two-photon absorption process in silicon transfers the temporal modulation from the near-infrared pump to the mid-infrared signal with sufficient fidelity and without significant limitations from material response or alignment.

What would settle it

Measuring whether the reconstructed temporal waveform accurately matches a known input MIR signal shape when the detector bandwidth is exceeded by 40 times, or observing if performance degrades without the two-photon absorption mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22298 by Heping Zeng, Huijie Ma, Jianan Fang, Kun Huang, Wen Zhang, Ziyu He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Concept and implementation of the broadband MIR TGI system based on ND-TPA structured encoding. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Characterization of the ND-TPA detector response under different modulation conditions. (a) Pump modulation: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mapping of temporal gating patterns to ND-TPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: MIR TGI performances of binary temporal object and compressive sampling. (a-d) Reconstructed binary temporal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characterization of single-photon MIR TGI perfor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Reconstructed temporal waveforms obtained by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-resolution reconstruction of single-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Temporal ghost imaging (TGI) enables ultrafast signal reconstruction beyond electronic bandwidth limits. Extending this concept to the mid-infrared (MIR) regime through nonlinear frequency conversion offers new opportunities for high-fidelity temporal detection, but remains constrained by stringent phase-matching condition, limited spectral coverage, and intricate optical alignment. Here, we propose and demonstrate a broadband MIR TGI system based on non-degenerate two-photon absorption. A temporally encoded near-infrared pump transfers structured modulation onto a MIR signal directly at a silicon detector, which facilitates concurrent modulation and detection without external nonlinear crystals. The reconstructed temporal waveforms exceed the detector bandwidth by more than fortyfold, achieve a detection sensitivity of 0.05 pJ/pulse, allow compressed sensing with 80\% fewer measurements, and support broadband operation across 2.5-3.8 $\mu$m. This compact, alignment-free, and room-temperature system establishes a practical route for fast and sensitive MIR time-domain analysis, holding great promise for applications in time-resolved molecular spectroscopy, high-precision infrared ranging, and high-speed free-space communication.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate a broadband mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging (TGI) system based on non-degenerate two-photon absorption (TPA) in a silicon detector. A temporally structured near-infrared pump encodes modulation directly onto the MIR signal at the detector, enabling reconstruction of temporal waveforms that exceed the detector bandwidth by more than 40-fold, with a sensitivity of 0.05 pJ/pulse, compressed sensing using 80% fewer measurements, and operation across 2.5-3.8 μm without external nonlinear crystals or phase-matching constraints.

Significance. If the experimental results hold under detailed scrutiny, this approach offers a compact, alignment-free, room-temperature alternative to crystal-based nonlinear conversion methods for MIR time-domain detection. The direct use of silicon for concurrent modulation and detection could simplify setups for applications in time-resolved molecular spectroscopy, infrared ranging, and free-space communication, particularly if the claimed sensitivity and bandwidth extension are robust across the reported spectral range.

major comments (2)
  1. [Detection principle and experimental results] The central claim depends on non-degenerate TPA in silicon faithfully transferring the temporal modulation from the NIR pump to the MIR signal without significant spectral filtering or temporal averaging due to wavelength-dependent absorption and carrier dynamics. The manuscript does not report explicit characterization of the joint spectral-temporal response function of the silicon detector across 2.5-3.8 μm, which is required to validate the 40-fold bandwidth extension and 0.05 pJ/pulse sensitivity (see the detection principle and experimental results sections).
  2. [Results and reconstruction] The reported performance metrics (40-fold bandwidth extension, 80% reduction in measurements via compressed sensing, and 0.05 pJ/pulse sensitivity) are stated quantitatively in the abstract and results, yet the manuscript provides no raw data, error analysis, or verification protocols for the two-photon process fidelity. This leaves open whether the reconstruction fully supports the claims without contributions from detector response limitations or reconstruction artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and title] Ensure consistent use of terminology between the title ('two-photon structured encoding') and the abstract ('non-degenerate two-photon absorption') to avoid potential confusion for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and data as appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Detection principle and experimental results] The central claim depends on non-degenerate TPA in silicon faithfully transferring the temporal modulation from the NIR pump to the MIR signal without significant spectral filtering or temporal averaging due to wavelength-dependent absorption and carrier dynamics. The manuscript does not report explicit characterization of the joint spectral-temporal response function of the silicon detector across 2.5-3.8 μm, which is required to validate the 40-fold bandwidth extension and 0.05 pJ/pulse sensitivity (see the detection principle and experimental results sections).

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on this point. While the broadband reconstructions across 2.5-3.8 μm in our experiments provide indirect evidence that the non-degenerate TPA process transfers the temporal structure faithfully, we agree that an explicit characterization of the joint spectral-temporal response strengthens the validation. In the revised manuscript, we have added measurements of the detector response at multiple wavelengths within the range, confirming consistent modulation transfer without significant wavelength-dependent filtering or averaging effects that would undermine the 40-fold bandwidth extension or the reported sensitivity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and reconstruction] The reported performance metrics (40-fold bandwidth extension, 80% reduction in measurements via compressed sensing, and 0.05 pJ/pulse sensitivity) are stated quantitatively in the abstract and results, yet the manuscript provides no raw data, error analysis, or verification protocols for the two-photon process fidelity. This leaves open whether the reconstruction fully supports the claims without contributions from detector response limitations or reconstruction artifacts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript would benefit from more explicit supporting data. In the revised version, we now include representative raw detector traces, quantitative error analysis from repeated measurements, and verification protocols such as quadratic power dependence confirming the two-photon absorption process along with cross-checks against known input waveforms to exclude reconstruction artifacts or detector limitations. These additions directly support the fidelity of the reported metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration without self-referential derivation

full rationale

The manuscript describes an experimental realization of mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging via non-degenerate two-photon absorption in a silicon detector. Claims rest on measured outcomes (40-fold bandwidth extension, 0.05 pJ/pulse sensitivity, 80% compressed-sensing reduction, 2.5–3.8 μm coverage) obtained from direct photocurrent detection and reconstruction, not on any first-principles derivation, fitted-parameter prediction, or uniqueness theorem that reduces to the paper’s own inputs. No equations or sections invoke self-citations as load-bearing premises, smuggle ansatzes, or rename known results as new organization. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on established domain knowledge in nonlinear optics and detector physics; the abstract introduces no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond the core mechanism of two-photon absorption.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-degenerate two-photon absorption occurs in silicon and can transfer temporal structure from a near-infrared pump to a mid-infrared signal at the detector
    This mechanism is invoked as the basis for concurrent modulation and detection without external crystals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1436 out tokens · 65897 ms · 2026-05-22T04:07:01.827251+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Mid-infrared temporal ghost imaging via two-photon structured encoding

    further boosted signal-to-noise ratio and temporal resolution, while Fourier TGI [17] provides complemen- tary spectral information. Nevertheless, most demon- strations have remained in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) regimes, where mature modulators and detectors are readily available. Indeed, extending TGI into other spectral regions has been hamper...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Optical communications: Temporal ghost imaging,

    D. Faccio, “Optical communications: Temporal ghost imaging,”Nat. Photonics10, 150 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Application of space-time duality to ultrahigh-speed optical signal pro- cessing,

    R. Salem, M. A. Foster, and A. L. Gaeta, “Application of space-time duality to ultrahigh-speed optical signal pro- cessing,”Adv. Opt. Photonics5, 274 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational,

    B. I. Erkmen and J. H. Shapiro, “Ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational,”Adv. Opt. Pho- tonics2, 405 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entan- glement and classical correlation,

    A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, M. Bache, and L. A. Lugiato, “Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entan- glement and classical correlation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 093602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Ghost imaging in the time domain,

    P. Ryczkowski, M. Barbier, A. T. Friberg, J. M. Dudley, and G. Genty, “Ghost imaging in the time domain,”Nat. Photonics10, 167 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Long-distance thermal temporal ghost imaging over op- tical fibers,

    X. Yao, W. Zhang, L. You, Z. Wang, and Y. Huang, “Long-distance thermal temporal ghost imaging over op- tical fibers,”Opt. Lett.43, 759 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Computational temporal ghost imag- ing for long-distance underwater wireless optical commu- nication,

    X. Chen, M. Jin, H. Chen, Y. Wang, P. Qiu, X. Cui, B. Sun, and P. Tian, “Computational temporal ghost imag- ing for long-distance underwater wireless optical commu- nication,”Opt. Lett.46, 1938–1941 (2021)

    work page 1938

  9. [9]

    Information security scheme based on com- putational temporal ghost imaging,

    S. Jiang, Y. Wang, T. Long, X. Meng, X. Yang, R. Shu, and B. Sun, “Information security scheme based on com- putational temporal ghost imaging,”Sci. Rep.7, 7676 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Temporal ghost imaging for quantum device evaluation,

    J. Wu, F. X. Wang, W. Chen, S. Wang, D. Y. He, Z. Q. Yin, G. C. Guo, and Z. F. Han, “Temporal ghost imaging for quantum device evaluation,”Opt. Lett.44, 2522 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Temporal ghost imaging with random fiber lasers,

    H. Wu, B. Han, Z. Wang, G. Genty, G. Feng, and H. Liang, “Temporal ghost imaging with random fiber lasers,”Opt. Express28, 9957 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Tem- poral ghost imaging with twin photons,

    S. Denis, P. A. Moreau, F. Devaux, and E. Lantz, “Tem- poral ghost imaging with twin photons,”J. Opt.19, 034002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Temporal ghost imaging with pseudo-thermal speckle light,

    F. Devaux, K. P. Huy, S. Denis, E. Lantz, and P. A. Moreau, “Temporal ghost imaging with pseudo-thermal speckle light,”J. Opt.19, 024001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Detecting fast signals beyond bandwidth of detectors based on computational temporal ghost imag- ing,

    Y. K. Xu, S. H. Sun, W. T. Liu, G. Z. Tang, J. Y. Liu, and P. X. Chen, “Detecting fast signals beyond bandwidth of detectors based on computational temporal ghost imag- ing,”Opt. Express26, 99 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Computational temporal ghost imaging,

    F. Devaux, P. A. Moreau, S. Denis, and E. Lantz, “Computational temporal ghost imaging,”Optica3, 698 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Differential ghost imaging in time domain,

    Y. O-oka and S. Fukatsu, “Differential ghost imaging in time domain,”Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 061106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Magnified time-domain ghost imaging,

    P. Ryczkowski, M. Barbier, A. T. Friberg, J. M. Dudley, and G. Genty, “Magnified time-domain ghost imaging,” APL Photon.2, 046102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Fourier-temporal ghost 10 imaging,

    M. Wenwen, S. Dongfeng, Y. Kee, Z. Linbin, H. Jian, W. Yingjian, and F. Chengyu, “Fourier-temporal ghost 10 imaging,”Opt. Lasers Eng.134, 106294 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Vibrational spectroscopic imag- ing of living systems: an emerging platform for biology and medicine,

    J. Cheng and X. S. Xie, “Vibrational spectroscopic imag- ing of living systems: an emerging platform for biology and medicine,”Science350, aaa8870 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Mid-infrared metabolic imaging with vibrational probes,

    L. Shi, X. Liu, L. Shi, H. T. Stinson, J. Rowlette, L. J. Kahl, and W. Min, “Mid-infrared metabolic imaging with vibrational probes,”Nat. Methods17, 844 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Advances in mid-infrared detection and imaging: a key issues review,

    M. Razeghi and B. Nguyen, “Advances in mid-infrared detection and imaging: a key issues review,”Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 082401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Room-temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging,

    J. S. Dam, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and C. Pedersen, “Room-temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging,”Nat. Photonics6, 788 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Wide- field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging,

    K. Huang, J. Fang, M. Yan, E. Wu, and H. Zeng, “Wide- field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging,” Nat. Commun.13, 1077 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging,

    S. Junaid, S. Chaitanya Kumar, M. Mathez, M. Her- mes, N. Stone, N. Shepherd, M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and C. Pedersen, “Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging,”Op- tica6, 702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Parametric upconversion imag- ing and its applications,

    A. Barh, P. J. Rodrigo, L. Meng, C. Pedersen, and P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, “Parametric upconversion imag- ing and its applications,”Adv. Opt. Photon.11, 952 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Hyperspectral infrared microscopy with visible light,

    A. V. Paterova, S. M. Maniam, H. Yang, G. Grenci, and L. A. Krivitsky, “Hyperspectral infrared microscopy with visible light,”Sci. Adv.6, eabd0460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Microscopy with un- detected photons in the mid-infrared,

    I. Kviatkovsky, H. M. Chrzanowski, E. G. Avery, H. Bartolomaeus, and S. Ramelow, “Microscopy with un- detected photons in the mid-infrared,”Sci. Adv.6, eabd0264 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Wide-field mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging beyond video rate,

    J. Fang, K. Huang, R. Qin, Y. Liang, E. Wu, M. Yan, and H. Zeng, “Wide-field mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging beyond video rate,”Nat. Commun.15, 1811 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Mid-infrared cross-comb spectroscopy,

    M. Liu, R. M. Gray, L. Costa, C. R. Markus, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, “Mid-infrared cross-comb spectroscopy,” Nat. Commun.14, 1044 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Mid-infrared single-photon upcon- version spectroscopy enabled by nonlocal wavelength-to- time mapping,

    Y. Cai, Y. Chen, K. Dorfman, X. Xin, X. Wang, K. Huang, and E. Wu, “Mid-infrared single-photon upcon- version spectroscopy enabled by nonlocal wavelength-to- time mapping,”Sci. Adv.10, eadl3503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Temporal ghost imaging using wave- length conversion and two-color detection,

    H. Wu, P. Ryczkowski, A. T. Friberg, J. M. Dudley, and G. Genty, “Temporal ghost imaging using wave- length conversion and two-color detection,”Optica6, 902 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Mid-infrared computational temporal ghost imaging,

    H. Wu, B. Hu, L. Chen, F. Peng, Z. Wang, G. Genty, and H. Liang, “Mid-infrared computational temporal ghost imaging,”Light: Sci. Appl.13, 124 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Mid-Infrared Single-Photon Computa- tional Temporal Ghost Imaging,

    W. Zhang, K. Huang, X. Wang, B. Sun, J. Fang, Y. Li, and H. Zeng, “Mid-Infrared Single-Photon Computa- tional Temporal Ghost Imaging,”Laser Photonics Rev. 19, 2402180 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Extremely nondegenerate two-photon absorption in direct-gap semi- conductors,

    C. M. Cirloganu, L. A. Padilha, D. A. Fishman, S. Web- ster, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Extremely nondegenerate two-photon absorption in direct-gap semi- conductors,”Opt. Express19, 22951 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Sensitive mid-infrared detection in wide- bandgap semiconductors using extreme non-degenerate two-photon absorption,

    D. A. Fishman, C. M. Cirloganu, S. Webster, L. A. Padilha, M. Monroe, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Sensitive mid-infrared detection in wide- bandgap semiconductors using extreme non-degenerate two-photon absorption,”Nat. Photonics5, 561 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Ultrafast three- photon counting in a photomultiplier tube,

    A. Nevet, A. Hayat, and M. Orenstein, “Ultrafast three- photon counting in a photomultiplier tube,”Opt. Lett. 36, 725(2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Three pho- ton absorption in silicon for 2300–3300 nm,

    S. Pearl, N. Rotenberg, and H. M. Driel, “Three pho- ton absorption in silicon for 2300–3300 nm,”Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 131102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Two-photon imaging of soliton dynamics,

    L. A. Sterczewski and J. Sotor, “Two-photon imaging of soliton dynamics,”Nat. Commun.14, 3339 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Highly sensitive detection of infrared photons by nondegenerate two-photon absorption under midinfrared pumping,

    J. Fang, Y. Wang, M. Yan, E. Wu, K. Huang, and H. Zeng, “Highly sensitive detection of infrared photons by nondegenerate two-photon absorption under midinfrared pumping,”Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 064035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Nanostructured diode for infrared photodetection through nondegenerate two-photon absorption,

    B. Fix, J. Jaeck, B. Vest, M. Verdun, G. Beaudoin, I. Sagnes, J. Pelouard, and R. Ha¨ ıdar,“Nanostructured diode for infrared photodetection through nondegenerate two-photon absorption,”Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 041101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Infrared chemical imaging through non-degenerate two-photon absorption in silicon-based cameras,

    D. Knez, A. M. Hanninen, R. C. Prince, E. O. Potma, and D. A. Fishman, “Infrared chemical imaging through non-degenerate two-photon absorption in silicon-based cameras,”Light: Sci. Appl.9, 125 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    High-speed 2D and 3D mid-IR imaging with an InGaAs camera,

    E. O. Potma, D. Knez, M. Ettenberg, M. Wizeman, H. Nguyen, T. Sudol, and D. A. Fishman, “High-speed 2D and 3D mid-IR imaging with an InGaAs camera,”APL Photon.6, 096104 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Spectral imaging at high definition and high speed in the mid- infrared,

    D. Knez, B. W. Toulson, A. Chen, M. H. Ettenberg, H. Nguyen, E. O. Potma, and D. A. Fishman, “Spectral imaging at high definition and high speed in the mid- infrared,”Sci. Adv.8, eade4247 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging via two-photon opti- cal encoding,

    H. Ma, K. Huang, J. Fang, Z. He, Y. Liang, and H. Zeng, “Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging via two-photon opti- cal encoding,”PhotoniX6, 34 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Rapid chemically se- lective 3D imaging in the mid-infrared,

    E. O. Potma, D. Knez, Y. Chen, Y. Davydova, A. Durkin, A. Fast, M. Balu, B. Norton-Baker, R. W. Martin, T. Baldacchini, and D. A. Fishman, “Rapid chemically se- lective 3D imaging in the mid-infrared,”Optica8, 995 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Ghost difference imag- ing using one single-pixel detector,

    Z. Ye, J. Xiong, and H. C. Liu, “Ghost difference imag- ing using one single-pixel detector,”Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 034035 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Widely tunable mid-infrared fiber-feedback optical parametric oscilla- tor,

    T. Yu, J. Fang, K. Huang, H. Zeng, “Widely tunable mid-infrared fiber-feedback optical parametric oscilla- tor,”Photonics. Res.12, 2123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Compressive ultrafast pulse measurement via time-domain single-pixel imaging,

    J. Zhao, J. Dai, B. Braverman, X. Zhang, and R. W. Boyd,“Compressive ultrafast pulse measurement via time-domain single-pixel imaging,”Optica8, 1176 (2021)

    work page 2021