REVIEW
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reionization in HESTIA: Studying reionization in the LG through zoom simulations
read the original abstract
While cosmic reionization has been broadly constrained by global observables, the interplay between internal sources [Milky Way (MW), M31, and their satellites] and external ionization fronts remains poorly understood in a realistic Local Group (LG) context. To address this issue, we perform radiative transfer post-processing on the original hestia LG constrained simulation. We calibrate our source models using a uniform $1024^3$ particle, dark matter-only, hestia simulation coupled with a subgrid collapse fraction model to match the global reionization observables. These source models are then applied to the hestia zoom-in simulations, which consist of a $4096^3$ particle effective resolution in the zoom region centred on the MW and M31 haloes, which resolves haloes down to $10^8$ M$_{\odot}$. We find that in all scenarios, reionization within the LG proceeds in an inside-out manner with the progenitors of the MW and M31 having 50 per cent of their material ionized by $z \sim 9-8.6$, significantly earlier than the global mid-point at $z \sim 7-7.7$, noting that external fronts from large-scale structure play a negligible role, even under the most permissive feedback model. We further show that present-day satellite galaxies exhibit only a weak correlation between their reionization redshift and their present-day radial distance from their host halo, with somewhat tighter trends around M31 than the MW. Finally, we find that presentday satellites whose assembly preceded the reionization of most of their $z = 0$ material are systematically more massive today, suggesting that the oldest stellar populations preferentially reside in the most massive $z = 0$ subhaloes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.