Reply to "Incommensurate vortices and phase transitions in two-dimensional XY models with interaction having auxiliary minima" by S. E. Korshunov

F. C. Poderoso; G. A. Canova; J. J. Arenzon; Y. Levin

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1207.3447 v1 pith:2BPBBEE2 submitted 2012-07-14 cond-mat.stat-mech

Reply to "Incommensurate vortices and phase transitions in two-dimensional XY models with interaction having auxiliary minima" by S. E. Korshunov

G. A. Canova , F. C. Poderoso , J. J. Arenzon , Y. Levin This is my paper

classification cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords phaseexistencekorshunovmodelsargumentarxivauxiliarycalculated

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

We present a rigorous proof and extensive numerical simulations showing the existence of a transition between the paramagnetic and nematic phases, in a class of generalized XY models. This confirms the topology of the phase diagram calculated by Poderoso et al. [PRL 106(2011)067202]. The results disprove the heuristic argument presented by Korshunov in arXiv:1207.2349v1, against the existence of the generalized-nematic phase in a model with $q=3$.

Reply to "Incommensurate vortices and phase transitions in two-dimensional XY models with interaction having auxiliary minima" by S. E. Korshunov

discussion (0)