Researcher Evidence Record
Yu Kee Ooi
This bounded record lists 4 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include cond-mat.mtrl-sci work dated 2019 to 2020. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.
Compiled coverage vector
A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.
Attributed works
A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.
-
2020 Pith paper
Defect states and their electric field-enhanced electron thermal emission in heavily Zr-doped beta-Ga2O3 crystals
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Yu Kee Ooi
- Author position
- 2
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2020 Pith paper
Oxygen annealing induced changes in defects within beta-Ga2O3 epitaxial films measured using photoluminescence
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Yu Kee Ooi
- Author position
- 2
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2020 Pith paper
On the origin of red luminescence from iron-doped beta-Ga2O3 bulk crystals
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Yu Kee Ooi
- Author position
- 2
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2019 Pith paper
Delta-doped \b{eta}-Ga2O3 thin films and \b{eta}-(Al0.26Ga0.74)2O3/\b{eta}-Ga2O3 heterostructures grown by metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Yu Kee Ooi
- Author position
- 4
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
Evidence apparatus
The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.
| Lane | State | Observed | Boundary and source |
|---|---|---|---|
| identity | Measured | 2 | Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers. source=authors, author_identifiers |
| papers | Measured | 4 of 4 bounded rows | Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus. source=paper_authors |
| works | Measured zero | 0 of 0 bounded rows | Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger. source=author_works |
| reviews | Measured zero | 0 of 4 bounded rows | Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person. source=current_verdicts |
| citations | Measured zero | 0 of 4 bounded rows | Counts remain itemized by work and source. source=cited_works |
| coauthors | Measured | 10 of 4 bounded rows | Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows. source=paper_authors |
| account | Unavailable | No public count of 1 bounded rows | Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence. source=users.author_id |
Public identity sources
-
name variant
Yu Kee Ooi
Enumerated research scope
- cond-mat.mtrl-sci4 rows
- 20191 rows
- 20203 rows
Record scope
The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.
Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.
Self-published account annex
Linked Pith account
Unavailable No public Pith account is linked to this corpus identity.
The account lane is self-published. Linking proves account control only and changes no corpus fact.